Does people’s wellbeing get impacted by COVID-19 pandemic measure in Indonesia?

Authors

  • DAVID TJAHJANA Department of Information System. UNIVERSITAS MULTIMEDIA NUSANTARA, INDONESIA.
  • DIENA DWIDIENAWATI Department of Business School, BINA NUSANTARA UNIVERSITY, INDONESIA.
  • ADLER HAYMANS MANURUNG Department of DRM Business School, BINA NUSANTARA UNIVERSITY, INDONESIA
  • DYAH GANDASARI Bogor Agriculture Development Polytechnic (POLBANGTAN Bogor), Ministry of Agriculture, INDONESIA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.4873

Keywords:

happiness, mobility restriction, satisfaction, wellbeing

Agencies:

Connecting ASIA

Abstract

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic is not only to human health but also to other aspects of human life.  The most common action taken by the government in order to prevent the spread of the infection is mobility restriction.  The implication of this mobility restriction is limitation of social activities which can be done.  Mobility restriction was implemented in Jakarta and its surrounding cities and impacted more than 20 million people.  Is this mobility restriction impacting people’s wellbeing? The objective of this study is to see whether there is an impact on wellbeing- in terms of happiness and life satisfaction- in Indonesia due to mobility restriction.  A survey was conducted in April 2020. Happiness and satisfaction with life were measured by using the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL).  The reliability and validity of measures were analyzed with SPSS, and the differences between groups were analyzed with Two-Sample T-Test. The study finds that the respondents’ happiness level was only slightly happy, and the level of satisfaction was only slightly satisfied.  The respondents claimed that their happiness was deteriorated during mobility restriction (41%). Thirty-four percent felt their satisfaction was deteriorated.  Student group is shown as the most impacted group in its scale of wellbeing. The finding of this study can give insight for policymakers in implementing restrictive measures.  The result of this study gives an insight into which groups to be prioritized for support or helped to cope with the restriction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Conceição, P., & Bandura, R. (2008). Measuring Subjective Wellbeing: A Summary Review of the Literature.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s generation Z. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17556

Fancourt, D., & Steptoe, A. (2020). The longitudinal relationship between changes in wellbeing and inflammatory markers: Are associations independent of depression? Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 83, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2019.10.004

Fisher, D., & Wilder-Smith, A. (2020). The global community needs to swiftly ramp up the response to contain COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10230), 1109–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30679-6

García-Hermoso, A., Hormazábal-Aguayo, I., Fernández-Vergara, O., Olivares, P. R., & Oriol-Granado, X. (2020). Physical activity, screen time and subjective well-being among children. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.03.001

Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., & Wang, H. H. (2020). Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning During Educational Disruption : The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19 Outbreak Please cite the work as follows : Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University., (March).

Jongbloed, J., & Andres, L. (2015). Elucidating the constructs happiness and wellbeing: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i3.1

Lawrence, E. M., Rogers, R. G., & Wadsworth, T. (2015). Happiness and longevity in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 145, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.020

Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive Psychology in Practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Lussier, D. N. (2016). Contraining Elites in Russia and Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.

MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010

Mathews, G. (2012). Happiness, culture, and context. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2.i4.2

Michalos, A. C. (2008). Education, happiness and wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9144-0

Orth, P., Schnappinger, D., Sum, P.-E., Ellestad, G. A., Hillen, W., Saenger, W., & Hinrichs, W. (1999). Subjective Happiness Scale. Journal of Molecular Biology, 285, 455–461.

Peeri, N. C., Shrestha, N., Rahman, M. S., Zaki, R., Tan, Z., Bibi, S., … Haque, U. (2020). The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? International Journal of Epidemiology, 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa033

Tal, A., & Kerret, D. (2020). Positive Psychology as a Strategy for Promoting Sustainable Population Policies. Heylon, 6(March), e03696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03696

Tamminen, N., Reinikainen, J., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., Borodulin, K., Mäki-Opas, T., & Solin, P. (2020). Associations of physical activity with positive mental health: A population-based study. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 18(January), 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100319

VanderWeele, T. J., Trudel-Fitzgerald, C., Allin, P., Farrelly, C., Fletcher, G., Frederick, D. E., … Kubzansky, L. D. (2020). Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. Preventive Medicine, 133(December 2019), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106004

Downloads

Published

2021-05-04