Next Article in Journal
Human Papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7 Oncoproteins Alter the Abundance of Proteins Associated with DNA Damage Response, Immune Signaling and Epidermal Differentiation
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Dispersal of Epstein–Barr Virus in South America Reveals an African American Variant in Brazilian Lymphomas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Persisting Smell and Taste Disorders in Patients Who Recovered from SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection—Data from the Polish PoLoCOV-CVD Study

by
Michał Chudzik
1,
Mateusz Babicki
2,
Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas
2 and
Joanna Kapusta
3,*
1
Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatric Cardiology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Family Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-141 Wrocław, Poland
3
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Medical University of Lodz, 70-445 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2022, 14(8), 1763; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081763
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 8 August 2022 / Accepted: 9 August 2022 / Published: 12 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
In the majority of cases, patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus experience a complete resolution of symptoms within six weeks of acquiring the infection, but an increasing number of patients report persistent symptoms. This study aimed to analyse the prevalence of self-reported smell and/or taste disorders (STDs) in a group of convalescent patients after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and to identify risk factors for the disease. The study included 2218 COVID-19 convalescents after both inpatient and outpatient treatment. The sample group was analysed with regard to chronic diseases, place of isolation and clinical symptoms occurring during COVID-19 along with their duration. The assessment also included the most common symptoms of COVID-19 and the severity of the disease course. A total of 98 patients reported persistent smell and taste disorders up to three months after the end of isolation (67.4% of men and 32.6% of women). The mean age of the participants was 53.8 ± 13.5 years (49.19 ± 14.68 in patients with an STD vs. 54.01 ± 13.44 in patients without an STD). The patients treated for COVID-19 at home (p < 0.001) constituted almost the entire group of patients with persistent smell and taste disorders (97%). Among the patients with persistent smell and taste disorders, 57.1% suffered from at least one chronic condition (vs. 71.4% of patients without an STD). In patients with an STD, the number of symptoms per patient was higher than in the other group at 8.87 ± 3.65 (p = 0.018), while the most common clinical symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19 were smell and taste disorders (84%) (p < 0.001), significant weakness (70%), headache (60%), cough (55%), arthralgia (51%) (p = 0.034) and back muscle pain (51%). Based on the results obtained, the following conclusions were drawn: the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 is greater in younger people with less comorbidities and a higher number of symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19. The risk is associated with clinical symptoms occurring during the acute phase of COVID-19, i.e., smell and taste disorders and arthralgia. In addition, this risk is higher in patients receiving outpatient treatment for COVID-19.

1. Introduction

The clinical symptoms of COVID-19, a disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most often resemble a mild cold and include rhinitis, cough and a sub-febrile state. Unfortunately, there are also cases of severe pneumonia with respiratory failure [1,2]. Smell and taste disorders (STDs) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9] are equally common and important symptoms of COVID-19. These include a decline in or loss of smell (hyposmia and anosmia) and/or taste (hypogeusia and ageusia). They are usually reported within the first three days of the first manifestation of the disease [6,10] in up to one-fourth of cases [11,12].
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in upper respiratory tract infections in the general population was approximately 3–20% [13,14]. The percentage of patients with COVID-19 experiencing smell and taste disorders is approximately 41% and 62%, respectively [12,15,16].
With the emergence of an increasing number of COVID-19 cases, the British Rhinological Society (BRS) and the British Association of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck (ENTUK) were the first to observe and reveal that the loss of smell and/or taste could be an important symptom in disease diagnosis, pointing to SARS-CoV-2 infection. These initial findings were confirmed by subsequent observations [17,18,19,20].
Even though post-infectious smell disorders can be secondary to bacterial or fungal infection, they are most commonly caused by viruses [17,21,22,23]. The clinical course of olfactory impairment caused by COVID-19 is still unclear. Available evidence suggests that the most likely cause of anosmia during COVID-19 is the altered function of olfactory sensory neurons, their damage and, as a consequence, their death. Other mechanisms may also occur, including focal mucosal oedema and respiratory obstruction related to the inflammatory process in the olfactory epithelium [12,24]. Olfactory function impairment is usually accompanied by gustatory function impairment [14,25]. As in smell dysfunction, the pathogenesis of taste dysfunction in COVID-19 may involve indirect damage to taste receptors due to infection and the development of local inflammation [12]. This may be due to the report that the ACE2 receptor is highly expressed in epithelial cells, thus making the oral mucosa a possible site of entry for the SARS-CoV-2 virus [17,26]. According to NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), the condition of persistence of complaints and/or symptoms up to three months after infection—in the absence of an alternative diagnosis [27]—is referred to as long COVID syndrome or post-COVID-19 syndrome. According to the definition adopted by the WHO, this syndrome occurs in people after the disease and usually lasts up to 12 weeks. Its symptoms persist for at least two months and cannot be attributed to another cause [28]. In available observational studies [29,30] and cohorts, it was observed that it mainly affects outpatients [31,32,33].
In addition to fatigue and dyspnoea, smell and/or taste disorders are considered to be the main symptoms of the syndrome [34,35]. In many cases, these dysfunctions resolve within 7–14 days. However, in at least 10% of cases, patients continue to report persistent impairment after 4–6 weeks [17,22,36,37].
Long-term olfactory impairment can predispose patients to the development of medical conditions such as depression and cognitive impairment, which consequently worsens patients’ quality of life [14,24,38].
Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the prevalence of self-reported smell and/or taste disorders among a group of convalescent patients and to identify risk factors for the disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Methodology

The study included 2218 patients (808 women and 1410 men) with a history of COVID-19 (resolution of acute clinical symptoms—at least 14 days after last symptoms) who were part of the PoLoCOV-CVD (Polish Long-COVID Cardiovascular) study based on the analysis of data obtained from the STOP-COVID registry (study identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov—NCT05018052). The patient follow-up period spanned from 1 September 2020 to 30 September 2021 and included both patients who received hospital treatment and those who received outpatient treatment. The medical information in the registry refers to patients visiting healthcare centres because of persistent clinical symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection recovery. The sample group was analysed in relation to persistent smell and taste disorders.
This study used data obtained from the “0” appointment (first visit) and data obtained after 3 months. During the “0” appointment, information was collected from the patient regarding sociodemographics, chronic diseases, place of isolation and clinical symptoms occurring during COVID-19 along with their duration. Weight and height measurements were also taken to calculate the body mass index (BMI). In addition, patients completed health questionnaires and underwent a physical examination. Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination (after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccination in Poland, without regard to the type of vaccine used) was also evaluated, as well as the most common symptoms of COVID-19, i.e., fever/hypothermia, cough, shortness of breath, smell/taste/hearing dysfunction, weakness, chest/back/leg pain, headache/arthralgia, diarrhoea, vomiting, chills and blood pressure disorders (high blood pressure and/or dysregulation of well-controlled hypertension). The patients were also asked to provide a subjective rating of COVID-19 severity on a scale of 0 to 3 points. In the next step, the data obtained were used to classify the patients into separate groups according to the assessed disease severity given by them, where criteria included:
(A)
0 points (asymptomatic/mild course)
  • Asymptomatic course;
  • Parainfluenza symptoms lasting no more than 3 days.
(B)
1 point (mild course)
  • Home isolation;
  • Subjective patient rating of “1” on a scale of 0 to 3 points;
  • Duration of symptoms—less than 7 days.
(C)
2 points (moderate course)
  • Subjective patient rating of “2” or “3” on a scale of 0 to 3 points;
  • Duration of symptoms—7 to 14 days;
  • Presence of dyspnoea and fever ≥ 38 °C.
(D)
3 points (severe course)
  • Hospitalisation with a diagnosis of: pneumonia, respiratory failure, intensive care unit treatment, ventilator support, thromboembolic complications during hospitalisation/home isolation;
  • Or, in the case of home isolation: symptoms persisting for more than 14 days, temperature above 38 °C, dyspnoea, saturation < 94% persisting for at least 3 days, subjective patient rating of “3” on a scale of 0 to 3 points [39,40].
At the next follow-up appointment (3 months later), the patients completed a questionnaire that collected information on symptoms persisting up to 3 months after the end of isolation. Based on the rating given by the patients, smell and/or taste disorders were assessed after 3 months as disorders persisting continually from the onset of infection, higher than 50% compared to the pre-COVID-19 period.
The inclusion criteria were:
(a)
Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection (in accordance with current guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Poland);
(b)
Age ≥ 18 years;
(c)
Absence of contraindications to participating in the study;
(d)
Full recovery (resolution of acute clinical symptoms—at least 2 weeks after last symptoms);
(e)
Written consent to participate in the study.
Prior to participation, the patients were informed of the study objectives and how the study would be conducted, after which they provided informed consent to participate in the study. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics Committee of Wroclaw Medical University, Poland (approval number 232/2022).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Basic descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample group. The analysis pertained to qualitative, quantitative and ordinal variables. The groups of patients with and without smell and taste disorders were compared using the chi-square test for qualitative variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative and ordinal variables. The propensity-score-matched analysis, in which matching baseline variables included age and sex, was performed to minimise the baseline differences between patient groups. Matching baseline variables was performed at a ratio of 1:10.
Logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for the development of persistent smell and taste disorders. Univariate models were constructed, where the dependent (explanatory) variable was the presence of smell and taste disorders and the explanatory variables were sociodemographic variables (age, gender), influenza and COVID-19 vaccination status, chronic conditions, including their number, and the course of COVID-19 (place of isolation, symptoms during the disease, their number and duration and disease severity).
Multivariate logistic regression models with best subset selection were subsequently built for the explanatory variables using the Akaike criterion. In these models, statistically significant (p < 0.05) variables obtained through univariate analysis were the explanatory variables. Results are presented as OR (odds ratio) with 95% Cl (confidence interval) and p-value, where p < 0.05 was assumed. The analysis was conducted with the use of Statistica 13.0 by StatSoft.

3. Results

Characteristics of the Study Group

A total of 2218 patients (36.4% women and 63.6% men) were included in the analysis, of whom 98 reported persistent smell and taste disorders (67.4% men and 32.6% women). The mean age of the participants was 53.8 ± 13.5 years (p < 0.001). Based on the BMI, 692 (31.2%) patients were diagnosed with obesity, and obesity was also diagnosed in 22.5% (p = 0.042) of the group with persistent smell and taste disorders. Among the patients with persistent smell and taste disorders, 57.1% of patients had at least one chronic disease (p = 0.002) (with an average of 1.29 ± 1.44 conditions per patient (p = 0.011)), with the most common diseases in this group being hypertension (24.5%) (vs. 37.8% in pts without an STD; p = 0.007), thyroid diseases (17.4%), hyperlipidaemia (14.3%) and diabetes (11.2%). In addition, in 2021, 7.5% of patients in the total group were vaccinated against influenza and 22.3% against COVID-19 (3.1% and 73.9 in patients with an STD). A detailed description of the sample group, broken down into patients with/without persistent smell and taste disorders, is presented in Table 1.
The patients treated for COVID-19 at home (p < 0.001) constituted almost the entire group of patients with persistent smell and taste disorders (97%). The analysis of the disease course shows that the occurrence of persistent smell and taste disorders was most commonly reported after the second wave of the pandemic, i.e., 67 (68.4%) patients (p = 0.003). After the next waves of the pandemic, the number of patients reporting persistent smell and taste disorders decreased (wave 3–21.4 per cent, wave 4–10.2 per cent of patients). There was no difference in the incidence of smell and taste disorders between mild, moderate and severe courses of COVID-19. In addition, in the group of patients with a persistent STD, the number of symptoms per patient was higher than in the other group at 8.87 ± 3.65 (p = 0.018), while the most common clinical symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19 were smell and taste disorders (84%) (p < 0.001), significant weakness (70%), headache (60%), cough (55%), arthralgia (51%) (p = 0.034) and back muscle pain (51%), leg muscle pain (49%), fever > 37.5 °C, dyspnoea (46%) and chest pain (46%). The duration of reported symptoms was approximately 10 days (10.43 ± 5.49). A detailed summary of the data is shown in Table 2. The detailed distribution of the groups after propensity score matching is shown in Tables S1 and S2, which were added as Supplementary Materials.
The univariate analysis showed that the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 was associated with the obesity (p = 0.04), age (p = 0.001), number of comorbidities (p = 0.01) and number of symptoms during COVID-19 (p = 0.01). The risk was greater in younger people with less comorbidities and a higher number of symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19. The analysis of individual clinical symptoms showed that smell and taste disorders (p = 0.000) and arthralgia (p = 0.03) occurring during the acute phase of COVID-19 were associated with a higher risk of developing a persistent STD. It was also observed that people with an STD suffered from hypertension less frequently (p = 0.009). Furthermore, the risk of developing an STD was shown to be significantly higher in patients treated for COVID-19 at home (p = 0.002).
The propensity-score-matched analysis, in which matching baseline variables included age and sex, confirmed a statistically significant relationship between home isolation (p = 0.043), smell and taste disorders (p < 0.001), arthralgia (p = 0.016) and the number of symptoms (p = 0.02) occurring in the acute phase of COVID-19 with a higher risk of developing a persistent STD. In addition, it showed an increased risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 in patients with leg muscle pain (p = 0.04) and a decreased risk in patients contracting the virus in pandemic wave 3 (p = 0.016). Table 3 and Figure 1 show a detailed summary of the data.
In multivariate analysis, the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 was shown to be associated with patients treated for COVID-19 at home. Among the clinical symptoms occurring during the acute phase of COVID-19, smell and taste disorders and arthralgia were associated with a higher risk of developing a persistent STD. The propensity-score-matched analysis, in which matching baseline variables included age and sex, confirmed a statistically significant relationship between home isolation (p = 0.043), smell and taste disorders (the strongest independent risk factor for an STD—over 3.5 times; p = 0.004) and arthralgia (p = 0.05) occurring in the acute phase of COVID-19 with a higher risk of developing a persistent STD. In addition, it showed a decreased risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 in patients from wave 2 and 3 of the pandemic. A detailed summary of the data is shown in Table 4 and Figure 2.

4. Discussion

A significant proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections may be mild or asymptomatic, with a sudden loss of sense of smell or taste being reported as an isolated symptom in 3% of cases [5,41,42,43]. In this study, in the acute phase of COVID-19, 45% of the patients were observed to have smell and taste disorders, including 83.67% of the patients in the group with a persistent STD. In most cases, patients experience a complete resolution of symptoms after 2 to 6 weeks [33], but an increasing number of people are reporting symptoms persisting for even more than 3 months after recovering from COVID-19. This study analysed the occurrence of smell and taste disorders in patients with long COVID. According to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, patients with a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, without risk factors and with a mild course of COVID-19, can undergo treatment at home during isolation [43,44]. In the available literature, it was observed that these long-term symptoms are very common among outpatients [30,31,32,33]. Similar observations were noted by Logue JK and Klein H [45,46], who analysed patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 treated on an outpatient basis [33]. In this study, 2218 patients (36.4% women and 63.6% men) were included in the analysis, of whom 4.42% reported persistent smell and taste disorders. Patients with a mild course of COVID-19 who were treated at home constituted almost the entire group of patients with persistent smell and taste disorders (97%). A study by Athanasia Printza et al. reported no difference in the prevalence of smell and taste disorders between mild, moderate and severe courses of the COVID-19 disease. This notwithstanding, previous studies pointed to a higher prevalence of chemosensory deficits in outpatients compared to inpatients [47,48]. One of the reasons could be that those being hospitalised have more severe complications with life-threatening conditions, and less attention has been given to STDs. The analysis of recovery time for patients who regained their sense of smell showed that patients with hyposmia recovered faster compared to patients with anosmia. This is consistent with the data presented by Lechien et al., who found that less severe olfactory loss was significantly associated with earlier recovery [49,50]. In the study presented in this paper, the mean duration of reported symptoms was approximately 10 days (10.72 ± 5.74), but the patients were not differentiated by STD severity.
Lara Bull-Otterson et al. observed that post-COVID-19 smell and taste disorders were more common in patients under 65 years of age [51]. In this study, the mean age of subjects with an STD was 49.19 ± 14.68 years, confirming these observations. These patients were young and had less comorbidities than other people more severely clinically affected by COVID-19. The results we obtained can be explained, for example, on the basis of the immune response. People with a good and efficient immune response demonstrate prolonged immune-mediated disease of smell cells, prolonging symptoms [52]. Moreover, it is presumed that younger patients, who required hospitalisation less frequently, received mainly symptomatic treatment of the cold (without corticosteroids) or, in the case of asymptomatic patients in quarantine, no medication was used [53]. The available literature contains studies demonstrating the benefits of short-term topical or oral use of corticosteroids [5,24,53,54,55] and olfactory training [56] involving repeated exposure to smells [55,57]. The quality of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of these therapies, due to the size of the study populations, varies significantly [17], and to date, there have been no large-scale studies assessing their effectiveness [5,24,53,54,55]. Furthermore, oral corticosteroids were initially contraindicated by the World Health Organization as a form of treatment in this group of patients. The approach to steroid treatment began to change as more evidence emerged pointing to a significant reduction in mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 [24,58,59]. Furthermore, a study by Hyun Kim et al. shows that topical corticosteroid administration 2 and 4 weeks after treatment can accelerate recovery from olfactory dysfunction caused by COVID-19 infection compared with non-administration of corticosteroids (p < 0.0001). The results support the idea that the olfactory dysfunction observed in COVID-19 is mainly caused by an inflammatory process in the olfactory epithelium, and intranasally administered corticosteroids may have a beneficial anti-inflammatory effect [60]. Furthermore, it is believed that, in addition to reducing local inflammation, intranasal corticosteroids may improve the sense of smell by impacting on Na-K-ATPase enzyme activity and modulating the neuronal function of the olfactory receptor [14,61]. This means that although additional research is required to determine treatment outcomes among COVID-19 patients with post-infectious smell and taste loss, it is reasonable to build on previous treatment guidelines and recommend topical corticosteroids and olfactory training as first-line therapies for these patients [53] in the early acute phase of COVID-19 [24]. Nguyen NN et al. [62] observed that 30 out of 125 (24.0%) patients who reported smell and/or taste disorders during the initial acute phase of COVID-19 reported a persistence of these symptoms 6 months after onset. Similar observations in their study were made by Tan BKJ et al. [63]. Additionally, in the study presented in this paper, the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 was higher in patients with clinical symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19, i.e., smell and taste disorders and arthralgia. Most studies have not found any association of comorbidities with the persistence of olfactory dysfunction [49], confirming the results of the analysis presented in this study, but a recent study by Amer MA et al. revealed that comorbidities are associated with poorer olfactory recovery in patients with allergic rhinitis, smokers and patients with hypertension [50,64].
The study by Karaarslan F. et al. [65] showed the effect of obesity on the persistence of symptoms associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Khan A.S. et al. [66] investigated the relationship between obesity and COVID-19. They observed that obesity may worsen the identification of olfactory and taste disorders caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. Patel et al. [67] also found that a high BMI was associated with subjective olfactory dysfunction in obese patients. In our study, 77.6% of patients with persistent olfactory and taste disorders had a BMI < 30.
Moreover, the analysis of the disease course shows a decreased risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 in patients from wave 2 to 3 of the pandemic. As the pandemic progressed, it was shown that the percentage of people experiencing this dysfunction actually decreased, which confirms the observations of Boscolo-Rizzo P. et al. [68] showing the prevalence and the severity of smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 has dropped significantly with the advent of the Omicron variant. However, our dataset did not include patients suffering during the fifth wave of the pandemic; therefore, the results may differ.
The increasing number of individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 with persistent smell and/or taste disorders makes it necessary to identify predisposing factors for the observed disturbances to provide a better explanation of the mechanism of action of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the prevalence of self-reported smell and/or taste disorders among a group of convalescent patients and to identify risk factors for the disease.
Strengths and limitations of the study. The presented study was limited to interventions provided in primary care. It focused on patients who presented to a medical facility on their own, meaning that not all patients who had suffered from COVID-19 were included. The methodology used in the study is also a limitation because chemosensory dysfunction was not documented with olfactory or taste tests but was based on an interview with the patient. Another limiting factor is the relatively short follow-up period and the small sample size of the subgroups of patients with chemosensory loss. Differences in the two investigated subgroups may be detectable in larger groups of participants. It should be emphasised that in the study presented in this paper, the female population was almost half the size of the male population, so the results should not be translated to the entire population of COVID-19 convalescents. Furthermore, the authors of this study did not consider the impact of taking chronic medications or medications during and after infection, which may affect the occurrence and persistence of smell and taste disorders in long COVID, as well as the syndrome itself.
The strength of the presented study is that it compiles data from one of the largest registries of patients who suffered from SARS-CoV-2 virus infection (STOP-COVID), where most patients are those who received outpatient treatment for COVID-19. The sample group makes it possible to assess the impact of the place of isolation on the risk of developing the long-COVID syndrome and clinical symptoms during the course of the disease. This is very important because most COVID-19 patients without risk factors and with a mild course of the disease are treated at home. In addition, in the group with persistent smell and/or taste disorders, the patients were given recommendations for rehabilitation therapy based on taste and smell training. The STOP-COVID programme is still in progress, and a follow-up is planned in the future to evaluate the effectiveness of the methods used.

5. Conclusions

Based on the results obtained, the following conclusions were drawn: the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders after COVID-19 is greater in younger people with less comorbidities and a higher number of symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19. The risk is associated with clinical symptoms occurring during the acute phase of COVID-19, i.e., smell and taste disorders and arthralgia. Moreover, this risk is higher in patients receiving outpatient treatment for COVID-19, which may be related to the provision of different treatments to these patients than patients admitted to hospital wards with a severe disease course where, among other methods, steroid treatment is used. The increasing number of COVID-19 convalescent patients with persistent smell and/or taste disorders combined with the absence of an effective method for the treatment and rehabilitation of these patients necessitate the identification of predisposing factors for the observed dysfunctions, which will make it possible to better explain the mechanism of action of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and, therefore, introduce effective adjunctive therapies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v14081763/s1. Table S1. Patient characteristics after propensity score matching—differences between the group with and without persistent smell and taste disorders. Table S2. COVID-19 course analysis in groups with and without persistent smell and taste disorders. Comparison after propensity score matching.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.C.; Data curation, J.K.; Formal analysis, J.K.; Funding acquisition, M.B.; Investigation, M.C.; Methodology, M.C., J.K. and M.B.; Project administration, M.C. and A.M.-M.; Resources, M.C.; Software, M.C.; Supervision, M.C. and A.M.-M.; Validation, J.K.; Visualisation, M.C., J.K., M.B. and A.M.-M.; Writing—original draft, J.K.; Writing—review editing, M.C., J.K., M.B. and A.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by Wroclaw Medical University SUBK.C290.22.044.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics Committee of Wroclaw Medical University, Poland (approval number 232/2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly in order to maintain the privacy of individuals that participated in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hornuss, D.; Lange, B.; Schröter, N.; Rieg, S.; Kern, W.; Wagner, D. Anosmia in COVID-19 patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1426–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wee, L.E.; Chan, Y.F.Z.; Teo, N.W.Y.; Cherng, B.P.Z.; Thien, S.Y.; Wong, H.M.; Wijaya, L.; Toh, S.T.; Tan, T.T. The role of self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunction as a screening criterion for suspected COVID-19. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 277, 2389–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vaira, L.A.; Deiana, G.; Fois, A.G.; Pirina, P.; Madeddu, G.; De Vito, A.; Babudieri, S.; Petrocelli, M.; Serra, A.; Bussu, F.; et al. Objective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 patients: Single-center experience on 72 cases. Head Neck 2020, 42, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Speth, M.M.; Singer-Cornelius, T.; Oberle, M.; Gengler, I.; Brockmeier, S.J.; Sedaghat, A.R. Olfactory dysfunction and sinonasal symptomatology in COVID-19: Prevalence, severity, timing, and associated character-istics. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 2020, 163, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huart, C.; Philpott, C.; Konstantinidis, I.; Altundag, A.; Whitcroft, K.; Trecca, E.; Cassano, M.; Rombaux, P.; Hummel, T. Comparison of COVID-19 and common cold chemosensory dysfunction. Rhinology 2020, 58, 623–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Giacomelli, A.; Pezzati, L.; Conti, F.; Bernacchia, D.; Siano, M.; Oreni, L.; Rusconi, S.; Gervasoni, C.; Ridolfo, A.L.; Rizzardini, G.; et al. Self-reported olfactory and taste disorders in patients with severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 infection: A cross-sectional study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 889–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Klopfenstein, T.; Zahra, H.; Kadiane-Oussou, N.J.; Lepiller, Q.; Royer, P.-Y.; Toko, L.; Gendrin, V.; Zayet, S. New loss of smell and taste: Uncommon symptoms in COVID-19 patients on Nord Franche-Comte cluster, France. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 100, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Neto, D.B.; Fornazieri, M.A.; Dib, C.; Di Francesco, R.C.; Doty, R.L.; Voegels, R.L.; Pinna, F.D.R. Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19: Prevalences, Recovery Rates, and Clinical Associations on a Large Brazilian Sample. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 164, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kaye, R.; Chang, C.W.D.; Kazahaya, K.; Brereton, J.; Denneny, I.J.C. COVID-19 Anosmia Reporting Tool: Initial Findings. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2020, 163, 132–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mastrangelo, A.; Bonato, M.; Cinque, P. Smell and taste disorders in COVID-19: From pathogenesis to clinical features and outcomes. Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 748, 135694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boesveldt, S.; Postma, E.M.; Boak, D.; Welge-Luessen, A.; Schöpf, V.; Mainland, J.D.; Martens, J.; Ngai, J.; Duffy, V.B. Anosmia—A clinical review. Chem. Senses 2017, 42, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.W.; Kang, M.; Hwang, S.H. Efficacy of topical steroids for the treatment of olfactory disorders caused by COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2022, 47, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Agyeman, A.A.; Chin, K.L.; Landersdorfer, C.B.; Liew, D.; Ofori-Asenso, R. Smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rocke, J.; Hopkins, C.; Philpott, C.M.; Kumar, N. Is loss of sense of smell a diagnostic marker in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2020, 45, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hura, N.; Xie, D.X.; Choby, G.W.; Schlosser, R.J.; Orlov, C.P.; Seal, S.M.; Rowan, N.R. Treatment of post-viral olfactory dysfunction: An evidence-based review with recommendations. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020, 10, 1065–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Regemorter, V.V.; Hummel, T.; Rosenzweig, F.; Mouraux, A.; Rombaux, P.; Huart, C. Mechanisms linking olfactory impairment and risk of mortality. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kohli, P.; Soler, Z.M.; Nguyen, S.A.; Muus, J.S.; Schlosser, R.J. The association between olfaction and depression: A systematic review. Chem. Senses 2016, 41, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pinto, J.M.; Wroblewski, K.E.; Kern, D.W.; Schumm, P.; McClintock, M.K. Olfactory dysfunction predicts 5-year mortality in older adults. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hummel, T.; Whitcroft, K.L.; Andrews, P.; Altundag, A.; Cinghi, C.; Costanzo, R.M.; Damm, M.; Frasnelli, J.; Gudziol, H.; Gupta, N.; et al. Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 2017, 54, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Doty, R. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation, 3rd ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Suzuki, M.; Saito, K.; Min, W.-P.; Vladau, C.; Toida, K.; Itoh, H.; Murakami, S. Identification of viruses in patients with postviral olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope 2007, 117, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bon, L.S.-D.; Konopnicki, D.; Pisarski, N.; Prunier, L.; Lechien, J.R.; Horoi, M. Efficacy and safety of oral corticosteroids and olfactory training in the management of COVID-19-related loss of smell. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2021, 278, 3113–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parma, V.; Ohla, K.; Veldhuizen, M.G.; Niv, M.Y.; Kelly, C.E.; Bakke, A.J.; Cooper, K.W.; Bouysset, C.; Pirastu, N.; Dibattista, M.; et al. More than smell-COVID-19 is associated with severe impairment of smell, taste, and chemesthesis. Chem. Senses 2020, 45, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Whitcroft, K.; Ezzat, M.; Cuevas, M.; Andrews, P.; Hummel, T. The effect of intranasal sodium citrate on olfaction in post-infectious loss: Results from a prospective, placebo-controlled trial in 49 patients. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2017, 42, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, (SIGN) and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP). COVID-19 Rapid Guideline: Managing the Long-Term Effects of COVID-19. NICE Guideline, No. 188. p. 35. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567261/ (accessed on 18 December 2020).
  28. Soriano, J.B.; Murthy, S.; Marshall, J.C.; Relan, P.; Diaz, J.V. WHO Clinical Case Definition Working Group on Post-COVID-19 Condition A Clinical Case Definition of Post-COVID-19 Condition by a Delphi Consensus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 22, e102–e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carfì, A.; Bernabei, R.; Landi, F.; Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 324, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Garrigues, E.; Janvier, P.; Kherabi, Y.; Le Bot, A.; Hamon, A.; Gouze, H.; Doucet, L.; Berkani, S.; Oliosi, E.; Mallart, E.; et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e4–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carvalho-Schneider, C.; Laurent, E.; Lemaignen, A.; Beaufils, E.; Bourbao-Tournois, C.; Laribi, S.; Flament, T.; Ferreira-Maldent, N.; Bruyère, F.; Stefic, K.; et al. Follow-up of adults with noncritical COVID-19 two months after symptom onset. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 27, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Townsend, L.; Dyer, A.H.; Jones, K.; Dunne, J.; Mooney, A.; Gaffney, F.; O’Connor, L.; Leavy, D.; O’Brien, K.; Dowds, J.; et al. Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Desgranges, F.; Tadini, E.; Munting, A.; Regina, J.; Filippidis, P.; Viala, B.; Karachalias, E.; Suttels, V.; Haefliger, D.; Kampouri, E.; et al. PostCOVID19 Syndrome in Outpatients: A Cohort Study. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2022, 37, 1943–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sudre, C.H.; Murray, B.; Varsavsky, T.; Graham, M.S.; Penfold, R.S.; Bowyer, R.C.; Pujol, J.C.; Klaser, K.; Antonelli, M.; Canas, L.S.; et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Locatello, L.G.; Trotta, B.; Bruno, C.; Trotta, M.; Maggiore, G.; Rasero, L.; Caini, S.; Gallo, O. Systemic steroids may enhance recovery from loss of smell and taste in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: An observational study. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021, 11, 1689–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hopkins, C.; Surda, P.; Whitehead, E.; Kumar, B.N. Early recovery following new onset loss of sense of smell during the COVID-19 pandemic—An observational cohort study. J. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2020, 49, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reden, J.; Mueller, A.; Mueller, C.; Konstantinidis, I.; Frasnelli, J.; Landis, B.N.; Hummel, T. Recovery of olfactory function following closed head injury or infections of the upper respiratory tract. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 132, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vaira, L.; Hopkins, C.; Petrocelli, M.; Lechien, J.; Cutrupi, S.; Salzano, G.; Chiesa-Estomba, C.; Saussez, S.; De Riu, G. Efficacy of corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of long- lasting olfactory disorders in COVID-19 patients. Rhinology 2021, 59, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. World Health Organization (WHO). Living Guidance for Clinical Management of COVID-19: Living Guidance; World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 23 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chudzik, M.; Babicki, M.; Kapusta, J.; Kołat, D.; Kałuzińska, Ż.; Mastalerz-Migas, A.; Jankowski, P. Do the Successive Waves of SARS-CoV-2, Vaccination Status and Place of Infection Influence the Clinical Picture and COVID-19 Severity among Patients with Persistent Clinical Symptoms? The Retrospective Study of Patients from the STOP-COVID Registry of the PoLoCOV-Study. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nishiura, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Miyama, T.; Suzuki, A.; Jung, S.-M.; Hayashi, K.; Kinoshita, R.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, B.; Akhmetzhanov, A.R.; et al. Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus infections (COVID-19). Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 94, 154–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spinato, G.; Fabbris, C.; Polesel, J.; Cazzador, D.; Borsetto, D.; Hopkins, C.; Rizzo, P.B. Alterations in Smell or Taste in Mildly Symptomatic Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA 2020, 323, 2089–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Boscolo-Rizzo, P.; Borsetto, D.; Spinato, G.; Fabbris, C.; Menegaldo, A.; Gaudioso, P.; Nicolai, P.; Tirelli, G.; Da Mosto, M.C.; Rigoli, R.; et al. New onset of loss of smell or taste in household contacts of home-isolated SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 277, 2637–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Home Care for Patients With COVID-19 Presenting with Mild Symptoms and Management of Their Contacts n.d. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/home-care-for-patients-with-suspected-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-presenting-with-mild-symptoms-and-management-of-contacts (accessed on 27 April 2020).
  45. Logue, J.K.; Franko, N.M.; McCulloch, D.J.; McDonald, D.; Magedson, A.; Wolf, C.R.; Chu, H.Y. Sequelae in Adults at 6 Months After COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e210830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Klein, H.; Asseo, K.; Karni, N.; Benjamini, Y.; Nir-Paz, R.; Muszkat, M.; Israel, S.; Niv, M.Y. Onset, duration and unresolved symptoms, including smell and taste changes, in mild COVID-19 infection: A cohort study in Israeli patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Von-Bartheld, C.S.; Hagen, M.M.; Butowt, R. Prevalence of Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Reveals Significant Ethnic Differences. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 2944–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yan, C.H.; Faraji, F.; Bs, D.P.P.; Ostrander, B.T.; DeConde, A.S. Self-reported olfactory loss associates with outpatient clinical course in COVID-19. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020, 10, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lechien, J.R.; Journe, F.; Hans, S.; Chiesa-Estomba, C.M.; Mustin, V.; Beckers, E.; Vaira, L.; Riu, G.D.; Hopkins, C.; Saussez, S. Severity of Anosmia as an Early Symptom of COVID-19 Infection May Predict Lasting Loss of Smell. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 582802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Printza, A.; Katotomichelakis, M.; Valsamidis, K.; Metallidis, S.; Panagopoulos, P.; Panopoulou, M.; Petrakis, V.; Constantinidis, J. Smell and Taste Loss Recovery Time in COVID-19 Patients and Disease Severity. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bull-Otterson, L.; Baca, S.; Saydah, S.; Boehmer, T.K.; Adjei, S.; Gray, S.; Harris, A.M. Post–COVID Conditions Among Adult COVID-19 Survivors Aged 18–64 and ≥65 Years—United States, March 2020–November 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Boscolo-Rizzo, P.; Polesel, J.; A Vaira, L. Smell and taste dysfunction after COVID-19. BMJ 2022, 378, o1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, T.J.; Yu, A.C.; Lee, J.T. Management of post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. Curr. Treat. Options Allergy 2022, 9, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hopkins, C.; Alanin, M.; Philpott, C.; Harries, P.; Whitcroft, K.; Qureishi, A.; Anari, S.; Ramakrishnan, Y.; Sama, A.; Davies, E.; et al. Management of new onset loss of sense of smell during the COVID-19 pandemic—BRS Consensus Guidelines. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2021, 46, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Abdelalim, A.A.; Mohamady, A.A.; Elsayed, R.A.; Elawady, M.A.; Ghallab, A.F. Corticosteroid nasal spray for recovery of smell sensation in COVID-19 patients: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2021, 42, 102884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pekala, K.R.; Chandra, R.; Turner, J.H. Efficacy of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016, 6, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Altundag, A.; Yıldırım, D.; Sanli, D.E.T.; Cayonu, M.; Kandemirli, S.G.; Sanli, A.N.; Duz, O.A.; Saatci, O. Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 164, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group; Sterne, J.A.C.; Murthy, S.; Diaz, J.V.; Slutsky, A.S.; Villar, J.; Angus, D.C.; Annane, D.; Azevedo, L.C.P.; Berwanger, O.; et al. Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA 2020, 324, 1330–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Mattos-Silva, P.; Felix, N.S.; Silva, P.L.; Robba, C.; Battaglini, D.; Pelosi, P.; Rocco, P.R.M.; Cruz, F.F. Pros and cons of corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19 patients. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2020, 280, 103492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Torabi, A.; Mohammadbagheri, E.; Akbari Dilmaghani, N.; Bayat, A.-H.; Fathi, M.; Vakili, K.; Alizadeh, R.; Rezaeimirghaed, O.; Hajiesmaeili, M.; Ramezani, M.; et al. Proinflammatory cytokines in the olfactory mucosa result in COVID-19 induced anosmia. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 1909–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rydzewski, B.; Pruszewicz, A.; Sulkowski, W.J. Assessment of smell and taste in patients with allergic rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000, 120, 323–326. [Google Scholar]
  62. Nguyen, N.N.; Hoang, V.T.; Lagier, J.-C.; Raoult, D.; Gautret, P. Long-term persistence of olfactory and gustatory disorders in COVID-19 patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 931–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tan, B.K.J.; Han, R.; Zhao, J.J.; Tan, N.K.W.; Quah, E.S.H.; Tan, C.J.; Chan, Y.H.; Teo, N.W.Y.; Charn, T.C.; See, A.; et al. Prognosis and persistence of smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID-19: Meta-analysis with parametric cure modelling of recovery curves. BMJ 2022, 378, e069503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Amer, M.A.; Elsherif, H.S.; Abdel-Hamid, A.S.; Elzayat, S. Early recovery patterns of olfactory disorders in COVID-19 patients; a clinical cohort study. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2020, 41, 102725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Karaarslan, F.; Güneri, F.D.; Kardeş, S. Postdischarge rheumatic and musculoskeletal symptoms following hospitalization for COVID-19: Prospective follow-up by phone interviews. Rheumatol. Int. 2021, 41, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Khan, A.S.; Hichami, A.; Khan, N.A. Obesity and COVID-19: Oro-Naso-Sensory Perception. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Patel, Z.M.; DelGaudio, J.M.; Wise, S.K. Higher body mass index is associated with subjective olfactory dysfunction. Behav. Neurol. 2015, 2015, 675635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Boscolo-Rizzo, P.; Tirelli, G.; Meloni, P.; Hopkins, C.; Madeddu, G.; De Vito, A.; Gardenal, N.; Valentinotti, R.; Tofanelli, M.; Borsetto, D.; et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related smell and taste impairment with widespread diffusion of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of univariate analysis determining the effect of sociodemographic variables, chronic diseases, influenza and COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 course on the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of univariate analysis determining the effect of sociodemographic variables, chronic diseases, influenza and COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 course on the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
Viruses 14 01763 g001
Figure 2. Graphical representation of multivariate analysis based on a model incorporating statistically significant predictors from univariate analysis determining the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of multivariate analysis based on a model incorporating statistically significant predictors from univariate analysis determining the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
Viruses 14 01763 g002
Table 1. Patient characteristics—differences between groups with and without persistent smell and taste disorders.
Table 1. Patient characteristics—differences between groups with and without persistent smell and taste disorders.
Smell and Taste Disorders
(n = 98)
No Smell and Taste Disorders
(n = 2120)
p-Value *Total
(n = 2218)
Age **49.19 ± 14.6854.01 ± 13.44<0.00153.80 ± 13.53
Women32 (32.65%)776 (36.60%)0.426808 (36.43%)
Men66 (67.35%)1344 (63.40%)1410 (63.57%)
Weight **76.58 ± 15.6479.75 ± 17.300.09179.61 ± 17.24
Height **169.13 ± 8.38169.11 ± 9.160.953169.11 ± 9.13
BMI < 3076 (77.55%)1409 (67.77%)0.0421485 (66.95%)
BMI ≥ 3022 (22.45%)670 (32.23%)692 (31.20%)
Number of comorbidities **1.29 ± 1.441.70 ± 1.620.0111.68 ± 1.62
Comorbidities56 (57.14%)1513 (71.37%)0.0021569 (70.74%)
Hypertension (HT)24 (24.49%)802 (37.83%)0.007826 (37.24%)
Thyroid disease17 (17.35%)357 (16.84%)0.675374 (16.86%)
Hyperlipidaemia14 (14.29%)426 (20.09%)0.158440 (19.84%)
Diabetes mellitus (DM)11 (11.22%)219 (10.33%)0.773230 (10.37%)
Coronary artery disease3 (3.06%)131 (6.18%)0.205134 (6.04%)
Previous myocardial infarction (MI)1 (1.02%)64 (3.02%)0.00165 (2.93%)
Heart failure0 (0.00%)26 (1.23%)0.27026 (1.17%)
Venous thromboembolism1 (1.02%)23 (1.08%)0.95124 (1.08%)
Asthma7 (7.14%)210 (9.91%)0.368217 (9.78%)
COPD1 (1.02%)50 (2.36%)0.38751 (2.30%)
Flu vaccinations in the previous season3 (3.06%)163 (7.69%)0.087166 (7.48%)
Vaccination against COVID-19 (n = 697)/
(n = 23 for smell and taste disorders)
17 (73.91%)477 (70.77%)0.744494 (22.27%)
BMI—body mass index, HT—hypertension, DM—diabetes mellitus, MI—myocardial infarction, COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, * chi-square test—distribution among patients with/without persistent smell and taste disorders, ** Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 2. COVID-19 course analysis in groups with and without persistent smell and taste disorders.
Table 2. COVID-19 course analysis in groups with and without persistent smell and taste disorders.
Smell and Taste Disorders
(n = 98)
No Smell and Taste Disorders
(n = 2120)
p-Value *Total
(n = 2218)
Pandemic wave
267 (68.37%)1087 (51.27%)0.0031154 (52.03%)
321 (21.43%)733 (34.58%)754 (33.99%)
410 (10.20%)300 (14.15%)310 (13.98%)
Course of COVID-19
08 (8.16%)157 (7.48%)0.542165 (7.44%)
135 (35.71%)616 (29.33%)651 (29.35%)
225 (25.51%)580 (27.62%)605 (27.28%)
330 (30.61%)747 (35.57%)777 (35.03%)
Home isolation95 (96.94%)1765 (83.25%)<0.0011860 (83.86%)
Hospitalisation without pneumonia0 (0.00%)33 (1.56%)0.21333 (1.49%)
Hospitalisation with pneumonia1 (1.02%)278 (13.11%)0.004279 (12.58%)
Hospitalisation with ICU0 (0.00%)19 (0.90%)0.34619 (0.86%)
Symptoms during COVID-19
Temperature < 36.620 (20.41%)294 (13.87%)0.056314 (14.16%)
Temperature < 37.523 (23.47%)477 (22.50%)0.822500 (22.54%)
Temperature > 37.546 (46.94%)1132 (53.40%)0.2101178 (53.11%)
Cough54 (55.10%)1360 (64.15%)0.0681414 (63.75%)
Dyspnoea45 (45.92%)1014 (47.83%)0.7111059 (47.75%)
Olfactory dysfunction10 (10.20%)205 (9.67%)0.816215 (9.69%)
Taste dysfunction1 (1.02%)139 (6.56%)0.027140 (6.31%)
Smell and taste disorders82 (83.67%)912 (43.02%)<0.001994 (44.82%)
Significant fatigue69 (70.41%)1555 (73.35%)0.5201624 (73.22%)
Chest pain45 (45.92%)923 (43.54%)0.642968 (43.64%)
Back muscle pain50 (51.02%)1115 (52.59%)0.7601165 (52.52%)
Leg muscle pain48 (48.98%)907 (42.78%)0.225955 (43.06%)
Headache59 (60.20%)1166 (55.00%)0.3111225 (55.23%)
Arthralgia50 (51.02%)851 (40.14%)0.034901 (40.62%)
Diarrhoea21 (21.43%)409 (19.29%)0.601430 (19.39%)
Vomiting4 (4.08%)146 (6.89%)0.279150 (6.76%)
Chills36 (36.73%)761 (35.90%)0.865797 (35.93%)
Labile blood pressure values16 (16.33%)311 (14.67%)0.651327 (14.74%)
Hearing dysfunction14 (14.29%)206 (9.72%)0.139220 (9.92%)
Duration of symptoms (number of days) **10.43 ± 5.4910.73 ± 5.750.57810.72 ± 5.74
Number of symptoms **8.87 ± 3.657.91 ± 3.610.0187.95 ± 3.62
ICU—intensive care unit, * chi-square test—distribution among people with/without persistent smell and taste disorders. ** the Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 3. Univariate analysis determining the effect of sociodemographic variables, chronic diseases, influenza and COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 course on the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
Table 3. Univariate analysis determining the effect of sociodemographic variables, chronic diseases, influenza and COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 course on the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
The Whole GroupPropensity Score Matching
OR95% CI for ORp-ValueOR95% CI for OR
Lower LimitUpper LimitLower LimitUpper Limitp-Value
Sex (men)1.1910.7741.8330.4270.9130.5211.6000.751
Age0.9730.9590.9870.0010.9980.9791.0170.857
BMI ≥ 300.6090.3750.9870.0440.6590.3561.2200.185
Hypertension (HT)0.5330.3340.8520.0090.7650.4191.3970.384
Diabetes mellitus (DM)1.0980.5772.0870.7771.3670.5593.3380.493
Coronary artery disease0.4790.1501.5340.2150.4070.0543.0630.383
Previous myocardial infarction (MI)0.3310.0452.4120.2750.000---
Heart failure0.000---0.000---
Venous thromboembolism0.9400.1267.0320.9521.1120.1398.9320.919
Hyperlipidaemia0.6630.3731.1790.1610.8640.4271.7460.683
Asthma0.7000.3201.5290.3710.8350.3222.1600.709
COPD0.4270.0583.1220.4020.8310.1066.4930.859
Thyroid disease1.0360.6071.7700.896
Comorbidities0.5350.3550.8070.0030.6250.3741.0450.073
Number of comorbidities0.8330.7200.9630.0140.8370.6961.0070.059
Flu vaccinations in the previous season0.3790.1191.2100.1010.2210.0291.6280.138
Vaccination against COVID-191.1710.4563.0110.7441.1330.6542.8730.654
Symptomatic course1.2550.3015.2220.7552.0310.26815.3890.492
Home isolation6.3702.00720.2150.0023.4410.83214.3920.043
Hospitalisation without pneumonia0.000---0.000---
Hospitalisation with pneumonia0.0680.0090.4920.0080.1950.0261..4430.109
Hospitalisation with ICU0.000---0.000---
Pandemic wave21.8510.9393.6370.0750.5620.2581.2230.146
30.8590.3991.8460.6980.3230.1280.8110.016
Course of COVID-1930.7880.3551.7520.3610.6820.2721.7080.546
20.8460.3741.9120.6220.6900.2711.7530.595
11.1150.5072.4520.2900.7850.3181.9380.971
Temperature < 36.61.5930.9602.6430.0721.4780.7752.8210.236
Temperature < 37.51.0560.6551.7040.8221.0880.6011.9690.779
Temperature > 37.50.7720.5151.1590.2120.7820.4691.3020.344
Cough0.6860.4561.0310.0700.7940.4741.330
Dyspnoea0.9260.6171.3900.7110.9820.5871.6390.943
Olfactory dysfunction1.0620.5432.0740.8611.0670.4682.4400.875
Taste dysfunction0.1470.0201.0620.0570.000---
Smell and taste disorders6.7883.94611.6780.0005.8852.94811.746<0.001
Significant fatigue0.8650.5541.3480.5210.7910.4491.3880.413
Chest pain1.1010.7331.6530.6421.2030.7222.0030.477
Back muscle pain0.9390.6261.4080.7601.1390.6811.9060.618
Leg muscle pain1.2840.8561.9250.2271.7131.0262.8640.039
Headache1.2380.8191.8720.3121.2670.7362.1830.392
Arthralgia1.5531.0362.3300.0331.8841.1253.1510.016
Diarrhoea1.1410.6961.8710.6011.1280.6912.3410.438
Vomiting0.5750.2091.5870.2860.8220.2882.3580.716
Chills1.0370.6811.5780.8661.0590.6291.7830.827
Labile blood pressure values1.1350.6551.9650.6511.1460.5632.3310.706
Hearing dysfunction1.5490.8642.7760.1421.6940.8223.4870.153
Duration of symptoms (number of days)0.9900.9471.0360.6760.9930.9481.0410.768
Number of symptoms1.0761.0171.1380.0111.0871.0121.1670.021
OR—odds ratio; CI—confidence interval; BMI—body mass index, HT—hypertension, DM—diabetes mellitus, MI—myocardial infarction, COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICU—intensive care unit.
Table 4. Multivariate analysis based on a model incorporating statistically significant predictors from univariate analysis on the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
Table 4. Multivariate analysis based on a model incorporating statistically significant predictors from univariate analysis on the risk of developing persistent smell and taste disorders.
The Whole GroupPropensity Score Matching
OR95% CI for ORp-ValueOR95% CI for OR
Lower LimitUpper LimitLower LimitUpper Limit
Comorbidities0.5900.3840.9060.016---------
Home isolation4.0851.27113.1290.0183.5660.83015.312
Smell and taste disorders3.4541.8566.4290.0003.2851.4397.493
Arthralgia1.5190.9962.3180.0521.3410.9302.231
Pandemic wave 2------------0.2740.0920.804
Pandemic wave 3------------0.1870.0570.608
OR—odds ratio; CI—confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chudzik, M.; Babicki, M.; Mastalerz-Migas, A.; Kapusta, J. Persisting Smell and Taste Disorders in Patients Who Recovered from SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection—Data from the Polish PoLoCOV-CVD Study. Viruses 2022, 14, 1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081763

AMA Style

Chudzik M, Babicki M, Mastalerz-Migas A, Kapusta J. Persisting Smell and Taste Disorders in Patients Who Recovered from SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection—Data from the Polish PoLoCOV-CVD Study. Viruses. 2022; 14(8):1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081763

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chudzik, Michał, Mateusz Babicki, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, and Joanna Kapusta. 2022. "Persisting Smell and Taste Disorders in Patients Who Recovered from SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection—Data from the Polish PoLoCOV-CVD Study" Viruses 14, no. 8: 1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081763

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop