Beyond Synchronous and Asynchronous Systems towards Blended Learning: Perspective on Medical Education through COVID-19 Pandemic



Aiman Hilmi Asaduddin(1*), Utiya Nabila Maulani(2),

(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected various aspects, such as the health sector, education, economy, etc., being distracted. This transition requires technology acceleration to maintain the e-learning process across the world, including medical education. E-learning systems, such as synchronous and asynchronous learning, have their own advantages and limitations, especially in medical education that needs theoretical and practical education. In this paper, a new model of mixed synchronous and asynchronous systems towards blended learning was described as an idea for better medical education through the COVID-19 pandemic. Learning systems can be divided into several types prior to previous researches, namely face-to-face learning, blended learning, flipped classroom, Information, and Communication Technology (ICT) supported face-to-face learning, synchronous learning, and asynchronous learning. COVID-19 pandemic forced the education system to full-online system learning, which is synchronous and asynchronous e-learning. In terms of theoretical learning, asynchronous systems may offer flexibility and convenience as well as the system can be used in conditions of time-zone difference, various internet connectivity, and different golden times for each student to learn factual information. However, asynchronous systems also may have a challenge in controlling the students to make sure they follow the class properly. To evaluate students’ progress, educational stakeholders can hold a weekly reflection program asynchronous distance learning. Besides, knowledge practice also can be conducted by focus group discussion (FGD) through synchronous distance learning The synchronous and asynchronous systems provide the students to arrange their schedule more flexible thus can be utilized to learn practical skills in face-to-face education, such as clinical skills and laboratory practices, with strict health protocols. This system will lead to blended learning, which is an online learning and shift-based traditional learning. This approach provides combination systems of asynchronous and synchronous distance learning to support blended learning in terms of lack of practice skills and laboratory competencies.

Keywords


Medical Education; E-Learning; Blended Learning; COVID-19

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers and Education, 127, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.007 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the covid-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Angelina, L. (2020). Strategi Pengelolaan Zoom Meeting Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Dimasa Pandemi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi (JUKANTI), 3(2), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.37792/jukanti.v3i2.219 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Argaheni, N. B. (2020). Sistematik Review: Dampak Perkuliahan Daring Saat Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia. PLACENTUM: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Dan Aplikasinya, 8(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.20961/placentum.v8i2.43008 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ba˛czek, M., Zaganczyk-Ba˛czek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszynski, A., & Wozakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Student’s Perception of Online Learning during COVID Pandemic. Medicine, 100(7(e24821)). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03327-7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chowdhury, S. D., & Oommen, A. M. (2020). Epidemiology of COVID-19. 3–7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fajrin, M. U., Tiorida, E., & Kunci, K. (2020). Faktor yang Memengaruhi Minat Perilaku Penggunaan Teknologi ( Studi : Pengguna Aplikasi Video Conference selama Physical Distancing ). Prosiding The 11th Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, 977–984. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18(July 2013), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Januraga, P. P., & Harjana, N. P. A. (2020). Improving Public Access to COVID-19 Pandemic Data in Indonesia for Better Public Health Response. Frontiers in Public Health, 8(November), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.563150 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mohammed, H. J., Kasim, M. M., & Shaharanee, I. N. (2018). Evaluation of E-learning approaches using AHP-TOPSIS technique. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 10(1–10), 7–10. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Muianga, X., Klomsri, T., Tedre, M., & Mutimucuio, I. (2018). From Teacher-Oriented to Student-Centred Learning: Developing an ICT-Supported Learning Approach at the Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 46–54. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Narayana, I. W. G. (2016). Analisis terhadap hasil penggunaan metode pembelajaran synchronous dan asynchronous. Semnasteknomedia Online, 4(1), 139–144. Retrieved from https://ojs.amikom.ac.id/index.php/semnasteknomedia/article/view/1255 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Olum, R., Atulinda, L., Kigozi, E., Nassozi, D. R., Mulekwa, A., Bongomin, F., & Kiguli, S. (2020). Medical Education and E-Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Awareness, Attitudes, Preferences, and Barriers Among Undergraduate Medicine and Nursing Students at Makerere University, Uganda. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 7, 238212052097321. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120520973212 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Riyad, M., & Pramana, C. (2020). Theoretical Education vs Practical Education. Test Emgineering & Managment, (January), 300–315. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/338831615_Theoretical_Education_vs_Practical_Education ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rowe, J. A. (2019). Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning: How Online Supplemental Instruction Influences Academic Performance and Predicts Persistence. Capella University, Minneapolis, MN USA. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scholkmann, A. (2017). “What I learn is what I like.” How do students in ICT-supported problem-based learning rate the quality of the learning experience, and how does it relate to the acquisition of competences? Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2857–2870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9629-7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suppan, M., Stuby, L., Carrera, E., Cottet, P., Koka, A., Assal, F., … Suppan, L. (2021). Asynchronous Distance Learning of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale during the COVID-19 Pandemic (E-Learning vs Video): Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2196/23594 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tawafak, R. M., Alsideir, A., Alfarsi, G., Malik, S. I., & Jabbar, J. (2019). E-learning Vs. Traditional Learning for Learners Satisfaction. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 388–397. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338991025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Young, T. P., Bailey, C. J., Guptill, M., Thorp, A. W., & Thomas, T. L. (2014). The flipped classroom: A modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(7), 938–944. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23515




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/jap.v1i2.733

Article Metrics

Abstract Views : 278 | PDF Views : 191


DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.30998/jap.v1i2.733.g724

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Aiman Hilmi Asaduddin, Utiya Nabila Maulani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (LPPM)
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm. 
 

 Creative Commons License
Journal of Academia Perspectives is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.