Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact preprints@lancet.com.
Social Media Use and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Meta-Analysis of 14 Cross-Sectional Studies
23 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2021
More...Abstract
Background: The isolation due to early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) quarantine had people using social media more than ever. Yet, there had been contradictory claims regarding the effect of social media use on mental health. To have a comprehensive rationale for resolving conflicting claims about mental health, we aimed to summarize the association between the time spent on social media during COVID-19 quarantine and mental health indicators, including anxiety, depression, and psychological distress.
Methods: We included 327 studies from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in our meta-analysis. These studies evaluated the association between social media use and mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, and distress ascertained by a screening tool with a validated cut-off value. Based on how the findings were presented in the original studies, we summarized the final 14 studies in terms of the odds ratios (ORs), regression coefficient (beta), and correlation coefficient (Pearson's r). Data analyses included a random-effect model and an assessment of inter-study heterogeneity.
Findings: The time spent on social media was significantly associated with clinical anxiety and depression (anxiety: OR = 1·55, 95% CI: 1·31–1·83, I2 = 26·77%; Depression: OR = 1·43, 95% CI 1·14–1·80, I2 = 67·16%). However, no significant association was found in psychological distress (β = 0·09, 95% CI -0·29–0·46, I2 = 80·53%).
Interpretation: Our analysis demonstrated that the time spent on social media was associated with a higher likelihood of anxiety and depression, but no significant association was observed with symptoms of psychological distress.
Registration Details: This meta-analysis review was registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, registration No CRD42021260223, 15 June 2021).
Funding Information: This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science (2020R1C1C1003502), awarded to Sun Jae Jung.
Declaration of Interests: None.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation