Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact preprints@lancet.com.
'One Year Later' - SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immunity in Mild Cases of COVID-19
29 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2021
More...Abstract
Background: Duration and quality of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 have significant implications for the management of COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we present a comprehensive set of immunological data from a cohort of individuals (n=43), 12 months after mild COVID-19 disease and in the absence of virus re-exposure.
Methods: Serum and PBMC were collected from mild-COVID-19 convalescents 12 months after the COVID-19 positive PCR (n=43) and from healthy SARS-CoV-2-seronegative controls (n=15). Serum titers of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulins were quantified by ELISA and virus neutralisation activity was assessed using SARS-CoV-2-Spike pseudovirus particles. Frequencies of Spike and RBD-specific memory B cells were quantified by flow cytometry. Magnitude of memory T cell responses was quantified and phenotyped with an activation-induced marker assay.
Findings: In the absence of re-exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Spike- and RBD-specific antibodies were present in 90% of COVID-19 convalescents 12 months post-infection. RBD-specific IgG + memory B cells were maintained in 88.9% of patients, while 62% of patients had serum neutralising activity. Functionally mature memory CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were maintained at frequencies previously reported for earlier time points post-COVID-19, indicating substantial maintenance of durable T cell responses.
Interpretations: Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 persists for 12 months in mild COVID-19 convalescent patients that retain high Spike-specific antibody titres, virus neutralisation capacity and circulating RBD-specific memory B cells. Significantly, T cell immunity remained stable 12 months post-infection. This study offers vital information on the duration of natural COVID-19 immunity and its potential protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and clinical disease, with clear implications for the ongoing management of the global pandemic.
Funding Statement: This work was funded by project grants from The Hospital Research Foundation and Women’s and Children’s Foundation, Adelaide, Australia. This work has been supported by NIH contract 75N9301900065 (A.S, D.W).
Declaration of Interests: A.S. is currently a consultant for Gritstone, Flow Pharma, Arcturus, Epitogenesis, Oxfordimmunotech, Caprion and Avalia. LJI has filed for patent protection for various aspects of T cell epitope and vaccine design work.
Authors PGV, CMH, MGM, AELY, HB, ZAM, ZAD, AA, DA, JG, CF, SO, EMM, DJL, GM, EJG, BAJR, DS, CKL, MRB, DW, RAB, SCB and BGB declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval Statement: Study protocols were approved by the Central Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (#13050) and the Women’s and Children’s Health Network Human research ethics (protocol HREC/19/WCHN/65), Adelaide, Australia.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation