AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/171
Professor of Psychiatry, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR), Razi Psychiatric Hospital, Tehran – Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Saeed Shoja Shafti, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR), Razi Psychiatric Hospital, Tehran – Iran.
Citation: Saeed S. Shafti (2021). Vaccine Antagonism in COVID-19 Pandemic: An Appraisal of Statistics and Foundations. J Clinical Research and Reports, 8(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/171
Copyright: © 2021 Saeed Shoja Shafti, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 08 May 2021 | Accepted: 20 May 2021 | Published: 01 June 2021
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; pandemic; vaccine; vaccination; immunization; antipathy; culturable virus; megalo-organisms
Non-adherence to medical managements or non-compliance with standard shielding maneuvers is a familiar topic in the field of medicine. But now, after delivery of trustable vaccines, though in different brands, refusal of some people, due to personal alibis, to take part actively in vaccination programs against the dominant pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, and energetic encouragement of others to take the same antagonistic attitude, while immunization is the first-line strategy for controlling and preventing the aforementioned sickness, has augmented the said problem, especially when the delivered vaccines are not unreachable for them. Such an attitude, though not prevalent, may be considered as an intruding factor during implementing community vaccination, and if remains unanswered, may delay in some way the desired national outcomes. In the present article the said quandary, along with the plausible psychodynamic, psychopathologic, cultural or administrative causes, as well as available proofs and statistics, has been discussed, concisely.
While in another article, the problem of non-adherence to standard shielding maneuvers, whether individually or publicly, has been discussed [1], and in other paper the analogous non-compliance in proficient staffs [2], too, has been talked over, which are, principally, problems in the realm of primary prevention, now another similar confrontation is noticeable, which is over again in the said phase of prevention: that is, rejection of some people, due to personal alibis, to participate actively in immunization programs against the dominant pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), and energetic encouragement of others to take the same antagonistic attitude, while it is the first-line strategy for controlling and preventing the said sickness. Such an attitude, though not prevalent, may be considered as an intruding factor during implementing community vaccination, and if remains unanswered, may delay in some way the desired national outcomes. In the present article the said dilemma, along with plausible conscious or unconscious reasons, besides current state of affairs and statistics, will be discussed, briefly.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is primarily spread through saliva droplets, and lengthy physical nearness is considered the main risk factor for contagion. The germ may affect infected persons differently according to preconditions and age. Hence, there is an increased risk of hospitalization, admission to intensive care units (ICU) and decease due to increased age and for those with certain underlying illnesses [3, 4]. It is estimated that up to one-third of the Europeans is either elderly or has one of the underlying disorders, such as chronic respiratory disease, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, malignancies, liver disease, certain neurological diseases Down syndrome, and debilitated immune systems, which are associated with risk of severe infection from SARS-CoV-2 [4]. Other issues, such as smoking and obesity, have likewise been noticed to be related with risk of severe sickness from SARS-CoV-2 [5, 6]. Inoculation against SARS-CoV-2 is presently being executed worldwide to control the current pandemic. Nonetheless, there are yet queries about the precise nature of safety offered by the different vaccines presently in use and those still in progress. Two of those important inquiries are whether the vaccines A) prevent infection, and B) block transmission. Preventing contagion denotes to a vaccine preventing an inoculated person from getting septic even if they are exposed to the infection. Blocking spread mentions to the vaccine preventing an immunized person who gets infected with the virus from communicating it to other persons [7]. Without a healing treatment or a vaccine, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), such as physical distancing, have been used to reduce the illness. Nevertheless, there are worries about the long-standing sustainability of compliance with such defensive rules in terms of population acceptance and obedience, in addition to the impending societal and financial disadvantages. Therefore, along with NPIs, the development and usage of innocuous and operative vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the most favorable alternative for controlling the contagion in the long-term. An extraordinary number of vaccine nominees against a single disease and with different physiognomies are presently under development. These vaccines are being settled using various high-tech stages, both those previously established and new ones, such as mRNA vaccines [8]. The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic highpoints, once more, the susceptibility of human being to new contagions and immunization remains a conceivable scheme to return to ordinary life [9]. Also, with regard to surveillance objectives, generally the efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will be examined against: virologically approved symptomatic illness using PCR, laboratory sanctioned infection (symptomatic or asymptomatic) using PCR, or by indicating seroconversion caused by infection, indications of infectiousness and transmissibility - viral load (CT value) and culturable virus, hospitalization, mortality, and straight on person to person spread [10].
Evidential Analysis of Vaccination:
A number of studies have been published that give answers to queries about effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19, which have been summarized in Table 1.
After the recent pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, along with its huge morbidity, mortalities, and worldwide socioeconomic complications, eventually, by the help of science and biotechnology a number of vaccines against COVID-19, although in different varieties, has been delivered, which like their earlier prototypes, wish to challenge and eradicate the present intrusive microorganism and return the existing state of affairs to the pre-pandemic situation. Vaccine, as a well-founded way out and biomedical armament against a germ, which along with its frequent readjustments challenges vulgarly the existing remedies and therapeutic maneuvers, is the solitary implement for performing miracle by the capability of human being; an armament which has been evolved continuously and inexhaustibly through methodical outlook and unbiased practicality. For example, eradication of smallpox in the last century, and substantial decline of incidence of poliomyelitis, mumps, measles, tetanus, diphtheria, varicella, pertussis, tuberculosis, hepatitis (type A and B), rabies, influenza, pneumococcal pneumonia, meningococcal meningitis, whether endemically or epidemically, by active immunizations, has changed radically the natural life of human being and so was a man-made phenomenon. For sure, such an upgrading in lifecycle could not be acquired by nagging or grousing; it demanded humanistic scientists, who could challenge the natural disasters open-mindedly and sturdily. But, in spite of general greeting, some people repel inoculation and encourage others to avoid active immunization because they are suspicious of efficacy or safety of available vaccines, and pronounce that maybe it will annihilate the rest of survivors. While watchfulness with respect to existent threats and real vulnerabilities is an understandable and indispensable code for assuring the safety of self and kinsfolk, excessive distress or irrational antipathy destroys the desired wellbeing. What determines the trustworthiness of a blueprint or instrument? At this time, every evidence-based approach that is established on scientific perspective and methodical assessment can be trustable, except when its detriment is clearly and statistically more than its profit. Who differentiates between disadvantage and advantage? Only the scientist can differentiate between disadvantage and advantage, while he or she ought to consider the ethical issues, too. Who determines the moral code of studies? The ethical committee of associated administration can observe principled values, which are, in biomedical studies, in accordance with The ‘Declaration of Helsinki and Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects’ [28]. Accordingly, all human procedures are followed in accordance with the fitting standards of the Institutional Ethics Committee (Human Studies) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013. Also, the written informed consent is obtained from the participants, who constitute the considered sample size of every study. Thus, particularly in technologically advanced countries, different aspects or dimensions of biomedical investigates are required to be measured systematically. At this instant and with respect to vaccination, the said protocols are typically observed in the best way. As like as the great wars, which demand skilled commanding officers, pandemics, also, demand knowledgeable specialists. Governing contagion demands specific armamentarium. In this regard, vaccine is one of the most vital armaments, which shapes the primary prevention, instead of secondary prevention, which consist of various therapeutic exercises for management or treatment of ailments, or tertiary prevention, which aims to offset the incapacitating aftermath of illnesses. Persons, who, in spite of available proofs and findings (Table 1), while deny actuality or jeopardy of epidemic, reject the significance and inevitability of immunization, and attempt to interrupt folks’ trusts by their own awkward presumptions, may not be recognized as merely prejudiced, illiterate or oblivious people. They may be mentally sick, cerebrally debilitated, or civically devious persons, too; concerns which must be appraised knowledgeably and fairly (Tables 2, 3, and 4) [29, 33], because they seem like megalo-organisms that collaborate with microorganisms.
So, they may be considered as mortal enemy of civilization and humanity. While everybody has right, such as, to eat adequately or waste with hunger, to walk or drive, to get married or prefer bachelorhood, to rent or be a renter, and to choose between different alternatives, nobody have right to do misconduct or persuade or enforce others to commit crime or attempt suicide. For the sake of safety and survival of society, autonomy and free will cannot be infinite. Though such attitudes may sometimes have populist allures, they are not bearable because they are intrinsically chaotic. Persuading others to avoid participation in immunization is equal to endurance of pollution, morbidity and mortality. It is not, for example, similar to antipsychiatry attitudes, which involves a cadenced frolicking with metaphors and suppositions, by unauthorized guys for uninformed laypeople, who have never understood the real meaning of stigma and severe mental illness, and have never gotten the technical hitches of psychiatric rehabilitation [34]. Twisting folks’ thoughts in the direction of refusal of vaccination is per se a criminality because it exposes them to risky situation. Anyhow, though inoculation is the foremost tactic for control and prevention of COVID-19, specific shielding methods, such as wearing facemasks, hand cleanliness, social separation, and suitable ventilation are in the same way significant defensive maneuvers to decrease the risk of becoming septic with viral contagion during a pandemic [35-37], up until delivery of enough vaccination in the community and permission by authorized supervisors. According to some studies, while vaccination can have a real impact on reducing disease transmission and adverse clinical outcomes, with uptake of 40% or less in the population, vaccination is unlikely to eliminate the need for non-pharmaceutical interventions [15]. Undoubtedly, apposite interventions for targeting public misunderstandings about recommended shielding and preventative maneuvers can reduce preventable infection rates during pandemic. No society can stay alive without collective care and concern. Thoughtless demeanor of an inhabitant, thanks to private considers, is not allowed, since prejudice is endless, while fairness has clear boundaries and clues. Converting group favoritism to joint fairness is a stipulation if civic success is a mutual hope. Every citizen must be bright enough to comply with methodical guidelines, scientific discoveries, and logical recommendations, for the sake of public safety; otherwise, nasty microorganisms may find lots of free and undisclosed organic reservoirs for hiding, reproduction, and bullying human civilization; each time more devastating, infective, and lethal than before.
Providing public safety is not possible without active participation and mutual group effort of all citizens, particularly through catastrophes and pandemics. So, while personal guardedness or skepticism is in the frame of citizens' rights, propagation of societal cynicism, based on subjective uncertainties and philosophies, does not have anything to do with civil liberties, since it may ruin publics’ confidence and well-being seriously and irremediably. Moving from subjective deduction to objective verification could be acknowledged as one of the most important outcomes of cultural - historical evolution of human being. At present, Evidence - Based Medicine (EBM) and systematic biomedical studies can be accepted as trusty screens for escaping unsoundness and partiality, and final choice of favored method among some choices, especially with regard to civic protection. In nationwide misfortunes, individualism cannot be acknowledged as a respectable philosophy if it is devoid of problem - solving, assistant, or alleviating role. According to the available data, community participation in national vaccination programs is the best way for guaranteeing healthier environments and existence.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
