Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aimed at discussing online instructional strategies and learning quadrant for English language learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the current paper reviews possible instructional strategies and learning quadrant used by a teacher in the teaching process from online platforms to ensure the educational goals are plausible to be achieved, although without having to attend classrooms regularly, especially during the COVID-19 outbreak that happens during 2019-2020. Employing qualitative design, the study involved one teacher and 34 students. The data were collected through observation and interviews with the participants. The data analysis involved data coding, data description and data assertion. The results showed that although the participants did not attend a physical classroom, the learning process with various approaches for learning and assessments were still possible to engage the students.

Keywords

Covid-19 instructional strategies language learning online platform

Article Details

How to Cite
Halim, A., & Sunarti, S. (2021). ONLINE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A CASE FROM A CREATIVE TEACHER. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 6(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v6i1.12452

References

  1. Bauer-Ramazani, C., Graney, J. M., Marshall, H. W., & Sabieh, C. (2016). Flipped Learning in TESOL: Definitions, Approaches, and Implementation. TESOL Journal, 7(2), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.250
  2. Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson ESL.
  3. Chaeruman, U. A., Wibawa, B., & Syahrial, Z. (2018). Creating a Blended Learning Model for Online Learning System in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.36), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.36.29098
  4. Cohen, A., & Nachmias, R. (2011). What can instructors and policy makers learn about Web-supported learning through Web-usage mining. Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.008
  5. Conrad, D. (2006). E-Learning and social change: An apparent contradiction. In Perspectives on higher education in the digital age (pp. 21–33). Nova Science Publishers.
  6. Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., Yu, J. H., Liu, W., Tomory, A., Lee, Y. M., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2011). Facilitating students’ global perspectives: Collaborating with international partners using Web 2.0 technologies. Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.005
  7. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (Second eds). Teachers College Press.
  8. Halim, A., Khatimah, K., Rachman, D., Lubis, A. A., Sunarti, S., Puspita, R. H., & Rahmawati, Y. (2019). EXPLORING EFL STUDENTS’ EXPERIECENS ON ONLINE-BASED WRITING PORTFOLIO. Acitya Journal of Teaching and Education, 1(1), 1–9. http://journals.umkt.ac.id/index.php/acitya/article/view/200
  9. Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students’ approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501329
  10. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Opening windows for personal achievement. In Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education (pp. 138–171). McMilan.
  11. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
  12. Raharjo, D. H. (2020). Feasibility Test of English Instructional. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 5(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.10753