impact factor, citescore
logo
In press
In Press
Recent issue
Recent issue
Recent Supplement
Recent supplement
archives
Archives
articles free
Free to view
Search
Search
 

Brief Paper

 

Switching from intravenous tocilizumab to subcutaneous administration during COVID-19 pandemic: impact on treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

 

  1. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel. r_daood@rambam.health.gov.il
  2. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
  3. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
  4. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
  5. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
  6. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
  7. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
  8. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
  9. B. Shine Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

CER15682
2023 Vol.41, N°3
PI 0744, PF 0746
Brief Paper

Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)

PMID: 36062738 [PubMed]

Received: 16/03/2022
Accepted : 01/07/2022
In Press: 31/08/2022
Published: 23/03/2023

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
We aimed to assess the efficacy and patient satisfaction of subcutaneous tocilizumab (SC TCZ) in patients previously treated with intravenous tocilizumab (IV TCZ) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS:
We conducted a single-centre retrospective study at the Rheumatology Day Care at the Rheumatology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Israel. Clinical and laboratory data of IV TCZ treated patients who switched to SC TCZ were retracted and analysed. Data were collected from the last two visits before switching to SC treatment and two visits afterwards. A telephone call conversation was conducted for all patients who continued SC treatment and did not come to follow-up visits.
RESULTS:
Forty patients (age 53.03 (± 15.7)) treated with IV TCZ were switched to SC TCZ in April-May 2020. Three patients were excluded from the study. Most of the patients were treated with TCZ for 6.35 (±2.89) years and had low disease activity. 26/37 (70%) patients discontinued SC TCZ therapy and switched back to IV TCZ. The majority of discontinuations were due to flare up of the underlying disease reflected by increased number of tender and/or swollen joints, prolongation of morning stiffness or increased pain VAS score. Two patients were hospitalised for IV glucocorticoids and 1 patient underwent knee arthrocentesis. 11/37 (30%) patients continued SC TCZ treatment. 3/11 (27%) expressed less satisfaction with SC TCZ therapy.
CONCLUSIONS:
More than half of the patients who switched from IV TCZ to SC TCZ showed signs of flare of their underlying disease or were less satisfied with SC treatment.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/lxfy2v

Rheumatology Article