ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Under-reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
PUBLISHED 17 Mar 2021
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Coronavirus collection.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to compare  trends in the progression of COVID-19 among South Asian countries with more developed Western countries.
Methods: COVID-19 data from South Asian countries were used for this observational study. Data were taken up to April 21, 2020 from the outbreak of the COVID-19. Four of the seven countries met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis.
Results: An exponential increase in the average number of weekly cases was reported after the fifth week following the first case. The correlation between reported cases and tests was found to be strong and significant (r=0.90, p=0.037). However, on average, 315.25 tests per million population were performed, which was at least 12 times lower than the number of tests performed in countries with a large number of COVID-19 cases.
Conclusions: At present, the number of confirmed cases from South Asia was found to be significantly lower than in Western countries. Hence, an increase in the strength of performing diagnostic tests is highly recommended. Strict measures are required to make the people of these countries follow the instructions of social distancing and comply with preventive measures.

Keywords

COVID-19, coronavirus disease, SARS-CoV-2, South Asia, pandemic

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Some explanations and references have been added in Introduction and Method section. In Discussion, some revisions have been made according to the reviewer comments hence first and last paragraphs of Discussion have been modified.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Khalid Aziz Ansari

Introduction

Any outbreak of an infectious disease or a natural disaster on a large scale, which spreads over a large geographical area leading to morbidity and mortality, is known as a pandemic. Evidence suggests that the likelihood of pandemics has increased over the past century because of an increase in global travel, urbanization, and greater exploitation of the natural environment1. Consequences of pandemics are multidimensional, have an impact on global health, socioeconomic conditions, and political implications2. The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was reported in the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China. China is therefore considered as the epicenter of the disease3. However, in the current scenario, some European countries and the United States of America (USA) have become new epicenters of the disease. Individually, these countries have more than twice the number of reported cases when compared to China. Meanwhile, their death toll is at least five times greater than in China4. During the second week of March, the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO)5.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19, belongs to the same family of corona viruses that includes the Middle East respiratory syndrome virus (MERS-CoV)6. Signs and symptoms of COVID-19 include respiratory symptoms, fever, cough, and shortness of breath. These breathing difficulties can worsen over time, and the disease can lead to complications such as: pneumonia, severe acute respiratory syndrome, kidney failure, and even death. People with low immunity and underlying systemic diseases are more prone to SARS-CoV-2 infection7. This is why the highest death rates are reported in the elderly population among those who were infected by COVID-198.

Various precautionary methods have been adapted by countries to control and stop the spread of COVID-19. A few such measures include hygiene maintenance, public awareness, partial lockdown, complete lockdown, and even the imposition of curfews9. Currently, social distancing is the only recognized way to prevent the spread of the virus. Hence, countries are making decisions based on their circumstances and the experiences of other countries10. Based on data extracted from the WHO database, the progression of the disease and deaths in various regions and countries differ11. Statistics show a high number of reported COVID-19 cases and deaths in some European countries and in the USA as well. The first confirmed case of COVID-19 in some South Asian countries like India and Sri Lanka was reported on 15th of February 2020 while in Pakistan and Bangladesh, the first confirmed case was reported on 26th February and 8th March respectively. The trend in average weekly increases in reported cases remained untested. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to find the trend in the progression of COVID-19 among South Asian countries compared to more developed Western countries.

Methods

This observational study was conducted between 20th April and 22nd April 2020. The study included COVID-19 data available from worldometer®12. Data was extracted from the date of the first COVID-19 case reported up until 21st April 2020. Data was extracted for all South Asian countries that were affected by the current outbreak. Only countries with at least 100 reported cases by 21st April 2020 were included in the study and reason to do so was to prevent the analysis process from outliers’ effects as well as to keep pictorial presentation visualized. Hence, a total of four out of the seven countries were included in the study: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh.

The variables taken from the data source were: (1) total reported cases, (2) total deaths, (3) total recovered, (4) number of cases with outcome, (5) number of serious/critical cases, (6) total cases per one million population, (7) total tests performed, and (8) total tests performed per one million population. Furthermore, a few more variables were calculated using the extracted data and variables. The total outcome was calculated by adding the total number of deaths and the total number of recoveries. Percentage of deaths was calculated by using the equation [total deaths / (total deaths reported + total recovered) x 100%], the percentage of recovered cases was calculated as [total recovered/ (total deaths reported + total recovered) x 100%], the percentage of critical cases as “number of critical cases/active cases × 100%”, and the ratio of the number of cases tested by dividing the total number of cases by the total number of tests performed. The weekly number of cases reported after the first case reported until 21st April 2020 was also extracted from the data source. For the descriptive comparison of the present study’s findings of countries with a high number of COVID-19 cases, some of the statistics are summarized in Table 110.

Table 1. Data for COVID-19 extracted from worldometer®10.

CountriesNo. of reported
cases
No. of deaths
reported
No. of recovered
cases
No. of tests performed
per million
Population (per
km2)
USA792,93842,51872,38912,16736
Spain204,17821,28282,51419,89694
Italy181,22824,11448,87723,122206
France155,38320,26537,4097,103119
UK124,74316,509N/A7,38675
China82,7584,63277,123153
Turkey90,9802,14013,4307,991110
Iran83,5055,20959,2734,20352

The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS v. 23) was used for the analysis. Descriptive statistics included the calculation of averages and standard deviations as well as line graphs to present the number of weekly reported cases in each country. In inferential statistics, a simple linear regression was used between total cases (dependent variable) and total tests performed (independent variable). The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to analyze the weekly increase in COVID-19 cases.

Results

The total number of reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries by 21st April 2020 were 31,565 of which 5,526 (17.5%) recovered. The number of reported deaths was 901. Among South Asian countries, India had the highest number of positive COVID-19 cases (18,658; 59.1%), followed by Pakistan (9,216; 29.2%), Bangladesh (3,382; 10.7%), and Sri Lanka (309; 1%) (Table 2). The percentage of reported deaths was highest in Bangladesh (55.84%), followed by India (15.32%), Sri Lanka (6.54%), and Pakistan (8.5%).

Table 2. Country-wise extracted and computed variables after inclusion criteria for South Asian countries.

CountriesCasesDeathsRecoveredOUTCOMEDeath
(%)
Recovered (%)No. of tests performed
per million pop.
India18,6585923,2733,86515.3284.68291
Pakistan9,2161922,0662,2588.5091.50506
Sri Lanka30971001076.5493.46302
Bangladesh3,3821108719755.8444.16162

Figure 1 shows the exponential growth in the number of reported cases among the South Asian countries after the fourth to fifth week since the start of the disease. A sharp increase was observed in reported cases in India from the sixth week onwards. In Pakistan, the number of reported cases was also found to increase at the start of the fourth week. However, the spread of the virus was not as rapid in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, as was found in the Indian and Pakistani populations. A comparison of the average number of reported cases in each week with the previous week revealed that the average increase in cases was not statistically significant except between fifth and sixth week (z-value -2.02, p-value 0.043). Figure 2 presented descriptive comparison of the average number of confirmed cases between two consecutive weeks.

73523924-c10a-4994-8444-d5296163f6aa_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Weekly comparison of reported COVID-19 cases.

73523924-c10a-4994-8444-d5296163f6aa_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Weekly comparison of reported cases for South Asian countries.

On average, 315.25 tests per million population were performed in the countries included in the current study. A correlation between the total reported cases and the total number of tests performed was found. The data revealed a very strong, direct, and statistically significant correlation (r=0.90, p=0.037). The Bangladeshi population had the highest percentage of tested positive cases in relation to the total number of tests performed (12.71%), followed by Pakistan (8.24%), Sri Lanka (4.78%), and India (4.65%).

The regression model between the number of tests performed (independent variable) and total number of cases reported (dependent variable) demonstrated a very strong R-square value 0.925 with significance of the model (p =0.025). The predicted values of constant and slope for the model were 1442.4 and 0.045, respectively. Hence, the regression equation can be written as

No. of cases reported = 1442.4 + 0.045 (No. of tests performed)

Discussion

This study particularly highlighted the importance of maintaining data of COVID-19 patients and it indicated underestimation of COVID-19 positive cases in South Asian countries. Another important aspect of the findings was it regressed a model which found number of tests performed had significant and strong relation with number of cases. By comparing Table 1 and Table 2, difference in number of tests performed (per million) among countries with high number of COVID-19 cases (Table 1) and in South Asian countries (Table 2) can be seen.

As of 21st April 2020, there had been over 2.5 million reported cases of COVID-19 in 210 countries across six continents. At the beginning of this pandemic, China (82,758) was affected the most by the disease; however, later the USA (792,938), Spain (204,178), Italy (181,228), France (155,383), Turkey (90,980), and Iran (83,505) had the most COVID-19 cases worldwide. The number of reported cases has since started to increase in South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh). The initial cases reported in South Asian countries were thought to be caused by travelers returning from other COVID-19 affected countries. Although, by the date (21st April, 2020), the total number of reported cases in South Asian countries is not as high as it was in the USA, Italy, Spain, France, and Iran (Table 1). However, the weekly growth in the number of reported cases (up to the eighth week) in South Asian countries is quite similar to the increase in the number of reported cases in the USA, France, and the United Kingdom (UK).

Based on the preparedness index formulated by Greenhill and Oppenheim, which defines the ability of a country to curtail any pandemic13, the spread risk of this pandemic is higher in South Asian developing countries than in developed countries14. A few of the factors that contribute to a higher spread risk of the pandemic include population density, susceptibility to infection, patterns of movement driven by travel, trade, and migration, the speed and effectiveness of public health surveillance and response measures, and the socioeconomic status of the country14. Three out of four countries included in the current study fall under the top ten most populated countries in the world1517. Furthermore, the per km2 population in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan is more than any country listed in Table 1. In addition, a large number of people in these countries live in slums1517, which makes it difficult to maintain social distancing and to adopt preventive measures. Furthermore, poor education and extreme poverty are other factors that make it more difficult to follow social distancing instructions, or early disease identification of symptoms of COVID-19. A report from Pakistan showed an increasing number of cases where people died due to COVID-19 before reaching a hospital18.

To date, there has been a total of 2,505,858 reported cases of COVID-19 worldwide, with a lower number of reported cases (31,608) and reported deaths (901) in South Asian countries compared to other regions of the world. There have been many hypotheses related to this lower reported COVID-19 cases and deaths. Some of the theories included stronger immunity, warmer weather, childhood BCG vaccinations, and exposure to anti-malaria medications. From the data collected from the worldometer® website, the authors believe that the lower number of reported cases in the South Asian countries could be due to the lower number of diagnostic tests performed for COVID-19 virus compared to countries that have reported a higher number of COVID-19 cases. India (18,658) and Pakistan (9,216) have the most COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries, with 291 and 506 tests performed per million population, respectively. The number of tests (per million) performed in India and Pakistan is significantly lower than in the USA (12,167), Spain (19,896), Italy (23,122), France (7,103), and the UK (7,386). Even countries in Asia with the highest number of COVID-19 cases, Turkey (7,991) and Iran (4,203), have a higher number of tests performed per million population. In South Asia, on average, 315.25 tests per million population were performed; this is at least 12 times lower than the number of tests performed in the epicenters of COVID-19.

Even though the world is better prepared to face any health crisis than before, still the world is not fully prepared to handle a pandemic. Preparedness for any crisis does affect from financial status of any country hence financially strong countries would have better chances to have more health care facilities, resources, infrastructures to cope with any crisis. In present time, world is facing a pandemic and so far, its deep impact can be seen in various continents however it is not significantly hit south Asian countries yet.

Accountability for preparedness in these countries is diffuse, and many countries that are at the greatest risk have the most limited capacity to manage and mitigate pandemic risk. In addition, these countries need to perform the virus diagnostic tests in greater numbers to get an accurate picture of the pandemic. Based on the data, one could suggest that the low number of reported cases but with high percentage increases for South Asian countries could be a ticking time bomb waiting to explode, and this region could be the next highlighted region of this current pandemic.

Conclusions

Although the current number of reported cases and reported deaths from South Asia suggested that the spread of COVID-19 is not as high as it was in many other countries. However, a comparison of statistics and population characteristics does not portray a good picture for the future. Therefore, the following conclusions can be drawn:

  • 1. One side of the picture is a lower number of reported cases and deaths, but the other side of the picture suggests a large number of cases that are prevailing in the society that are unidentified and undiagnosed. Hence, identifying the spread of the disease by increasing the number of diagnostic tests is highly recommended.

  • 2. Governments in these countries are required to take strict measures such as partial or complete lockdowns in order to maintain proper social distancing, since a high population density coupled with low education levels and low disease awareness could lead to a new disease epicenter.

Data availability

Underlying data

Harvard Dataverse: Low Reported COVID-19 Cases in South Asian Countries: A Luck of Nature or A Ticking Time Bomb, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QLTVRW19.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Author information

Imran Alam Moheet was affiliated with Azra Naheed Dental College, Superior University, Pakistan at the time this paper was written but is currently at Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University, Pakistan. Faraz Ahmed Farooqi was affiliated with Department of Academic Affairs, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia at the time this paper was written but is currently affiliated with Department of Dental Education, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Feb 2021
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Khan SQ, Moheet IA, Farooqi FA et al. Under-reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries [version 2; peer review: 3 approved] F1000Research 2021, 10:88 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.36705.2)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 17 Mar 2021
Revised
Views
19
Cite
Reviewer Report 22 Mar 2021
Khalid Aziz Ansari, Department of Physiology, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK 
Approved
VIEWS 19
02/07/2021: Added detail of a competing interest which recently came to light about this co-authored article.

... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ansari KA. Reviewer Report For: Under-reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:88 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54941.r81572)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 18 Mar 2021
Junaid Ahmed, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, India 
Nanditha Sujir, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, India 
Approved
VIEWS 10
The revised manuscript has been ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ahmed J and Sujir N. Reviewer Report For: Under-reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:88 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.54941.r81573)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 10 Feb 2021
Views
28
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Feb 2021
Junaid Ahmed, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, India 
Nanditha Sujir, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 28
Thank you for the opportunity to review this article. This article is related to the most pressing health crises faced by mankind i.e COVID-19. The article is well written and adheres to the formatting of the journal.

... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ahmed J and Sujir N. Reviewer Report For: Under-reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:88 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.39768.r79261)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
27
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Feb 2021
Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj, Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Radiology, Melaka-Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia 
Approved
VIEWS 27
This is an observational study based on the data taken up to 21st April 2020. During this period South Asian countries mentioned in this study were already under lockdown (Bangladesh: from 22 March to 30 May; India: 24 March to ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kumbargere Nagraj S. Reviewer Report For: Under-reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:88 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.39768.r79263)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
67
Cite
Reviewer Report 15 Feb 2021
Khalid Aziz Ansari, Department of Physiology, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 67
02/07/2021: Added detail of a competing interest which recently came to light about this co-authored article.

This is interesting study and following areas need a little more revision.

Introduction section:
There are some ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ansari KA. Reviewer Report For: Under-reported COVID-19 cases in South Asian countries [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 10:88 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.39768.r79264)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 17 Mar 2021
    soban khan, Department of Dental Education College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Saudi Arabia
    17 Mar 2021
    Author Response
    Dear Khalid Aziz,
     
    Thank you for your time you gave to review this article. I appreciate your comments which will help to improve presentation of our work. We have ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 17 Mar 2021
    soban khan, Department of Dental Education College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Saudi Arabia
    17 Mar 2021
    Author Response
    Dear Khalid Aziz,
     
    Thank you for your time you gave to review this article. I appreciate your comments which will help to improve presentation of our work. We have ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Feb 2021
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.