COVID-19 Aftermath: Direction Towards Universal Health Coverage in Low-Income Countries; Comment on “Health Coverage and Financial Protection in Uganda: A Political Economy Perspective”

Background

The recent publication by Nannini et al on “Health Coverage and Financial Protection in Uganda: A Political Economy Perspective”¹ highlighted a number of challenges in Uganda. From the article, the political context in Uganda was not conducive for universal health coverage (UHC). In 2010, the government policy shifted from social sector investment including health to growth-enhancing sectors such as infrastructure development. This resulted in deterioration of health services and shortage of essential medicines. The community-based initiatives were not supported by a clear policy direction.

In Uganda, less than 2% of population were covered by financial risk protection systems. Financing had been relied on external donor sources and out-of-pocket payment; while government invested too little. The private health sector, accounting for half of the total providers was largely unregulated.

In 2020, during the legislative process for a UHC Bill in Uganda, the Initiatives for Social and Economic Right submitted its comments and suggestions on the contents of draft Bill to the Parliament.² Though the Uganda Parliament passed a National Health Insurance Bill on March 31, 2021, the President failed to ascent, but passed this back to the Ministry of Health for review and resubmission to Cabinet. Employers strongly opposed contribution to the National Health Insurance Scheme.³ We felt there is a long winding and rough road towards UHC in Uganda, especially complicated by the impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Currently, there are 27 low-income countries (LICs), of which 23 are in Africa including Uganda. Similar to Uganda, all LICs have been struggling to make a good level of UHC service coverage and were further hit hard by the pandemic in the past few years. Instead of commenting on Uganda UHC, this paper provides broader perspectives and analyses the pandemic impacts and prospect to recovery and proposes strategic moves to ensure clear direction towards UHC in LIC settings in Africa.

Health Development and Progress Towards Universal Health Coverage

In Table, we compare key indicators in five selected LICs in Africa. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.8.1 indicator on UHC service coverage index ranged between 32 and 54 in these five countries. Within this composite index, we observed generally low level of modern contraceptive prevalence, very low skilled birth attendance in Ethiopia (28%) and Central African Republic (40%). The low coverage of skilled birth attendance resulted in high maternal mortality ratio in Central African Republic and Ethiopia. Nevertheless, DTP (diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis) immunization coverage was moderate and high except Central African Republic (42%).

Per capita current health expenditure was lower than US$ 53 in all five countries; indicating inadequacy to respond to health need of population. In Uganda, current health expenditure relied on external donor (42%) and private sources (43%) notably out-of-pocket payment by households (38%). Government health expenditure was below 5% of government expenditure in all countries except Rwanda (8.9%). Prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure was high in all countries except Rwanda (1.2%) and Ethiopia (2.1%). The low UHC service coverage index can be explained by services unavailability, or services not being used due to unaffordability, unawareness, lack of trust on the demand side; geographical inaccessibility, limited capacity on the supply side. The low prevalence of catastrophic health expenditure represents good outcome when people have adequate access to care. However, low catastrophic prevalence attributed from foregone care must be rectified. This calls for regular monitoring of unmet healthcare needs.

Using UHC service coverage index below 50 and a density of doctors, nurses and midwives below the global median of 48.6 per 10 000 population, the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified 47 countries worldwide as critical shortage that should be safeguarded from international recruitment.⁴ All these five countries except Rwanda belong to this group, having the density between 0.3 and 1.4 per 10 000 population. There remain considerable gaps to meet the threshold set by WHO African Region which recommends 134 per 10 000 population of 13 cadres of health workforce to attaining at least UHC service coverage index of 70.⁵ The current health workforce density was far below the threshold for achieving health-related SDG of 44.5 doctors, nurses, and midwives per 10 000 population.⁶

COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts and Prospect to Recovery

LICs have very limited fiscal space to confront the pandemic, finance COVID-19 vaccines and support health systems recovery. As of June 30, 2022, 18.5% of population in Africa had at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, while this was 75.6% in high-income countries.⁷ Vaccine roll-out in Africa is hampered by failure of global vaccine solidarity, affordability and vaccine hesitancy,⁸ and capacity to immunize large population.⁹ As affected by pandemic, the data from 2020 revealed that the annual per capita gross domestic product (GDP) growth were all negative except Ethiopia (3.4%); and low fiscal space as government tax revenue was 7-8% of GDP in Central African Republic and Ethiopia. People living below the absolute poverty ($1.90 per capita pe day) was high, 65.9% and 56.5% in Central African Republic and Rwanda (see Table). Resources for pandemic response were shifted from other critical areas including education and public investment. Unsustainable external debt burdens, additional borrowing during the pandemic and increasing debt-servicing cost pushed a number of LICs on the verge of debt crisis. This requires urgent coordinated international support for debt relief.

Evidence shows pandemic recovery with higher levels of inequality within and between countries—a scar of the pandemic. The per capita GDP in developed economies is expected to fully recover by 2023; while it is elusive for many developing countries. Developing countries in Africa foresee a gap of 5.5 percentage points of GDP per capita compared to pre-pandemic projections.¹⁰

LICs especially in Africa also foresee a slow recovery of jobs; the pace of job creation does not match with the earlier employment losses and new entry into labour force. This will result in increased number of people living in extreme poverty above the pre-pandemic levels. The absolute number of people living in poverty in African LICs will continue to rise through 2023.

Complex humanitarian emergencies and natural disasters pose significant challenges to vulnerable populations in Africa. Millions of people in West and Central Africa were driven to the edge of survival due to a confluence of factors, such as conflict and violence, extreme poverty, weak governance, chronically high food insecurity and malnutrition, and the impact of climate change.¹¹ The March-May 2022 rainy season was the driest on record in Africa, causing acute food insecurity and rising malnutrition in Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia.¹²

Strategic Direction Towards Universal Health Coverage

The gloomy economic recovery, rampant poverty, inequality, complex humanitarian emergencies, low vaccine coverage, fragile health delivery systems can offset the progress of health development and offtrack many health goals in the SDG. Strategic moves to set the direction towards UHC require political leadership across successive governments which are guided by solid evidence.

A study by WHO indicates that when health spending increases, UHC coverage index also increases. Notably, increased per capita public health spending (between purchasing power parities $40 and 60) improves service coverage significantly, but not financial risk protection which only improves significantly when public spending is greater than purchasing power parities $200 per capita. Adequate absolute level of public spending on health is critical for UHC progress. However, at any given level of spending, particularly at low levels, there are certain scopes to focus on greater efficiency.¹³

WHO estimated 20% to 40% of total health spending was wasted through inefficiency.¹⁴ It proposed ten areas for efficiency gains especially in hospital sector which consumed most healthcare resources. Key policy interventions should focus on medicines such as the increased use of quality generic medicines, controlling excessive mark-up, surveillance and legal sanctions against substandard and falsified medicines. The unethical market promotion by pharmaceutical industry triggers inappropriate use, wasteful over-prescribing and dispensing.¹⁵ Fee-for-service payment stimulates supplier-induced demand¹⁶ or fear for litigation leads towards defensive medicines which drive healthcare cost without clinical benefits.

A study by Sparkes et al¹⁷ proposed two-pronged strategies. The first is collaboration beyond health sector such as working with Finance Ministry to introduce innovative tax on health-harmful products such as tobacco, alcohol and sugary beverage; conditional debt relief package upon governments increased spending on health and education and timely humanitarian assistance where needed.

Second, health policy needs to prioritize the poor and vulnerable. General tax financed UHC has more comparative advantage than payroll tax in which entitlement terminates when members are jobless from pandemic. Sparkes and colleagues also advocated monitoring of foregone care which might result in low prevalence of catastrophic health spending. Efficiency gains through provider payment reform towards closed-ended such as capitation and Diagnostic Related Group, even at the low level of health spending can make a difference on UHC coverage index and financial risk protection. Provider payment reform synergizes with the use of generic essential medicine and regulatory measures against supply-induced demand can improve efficiency significantly. Long term investment to strengthen and extend primary healthcare covering the whole population is the foundation for successful UHC implementation.¹⁸

Conclusion

Even in fiscal constraints from pandemic and current low health spending, governments in LICs can seize the opportunity to minimize resource waste, increase efficiency and prioritize the poor and most vulnerable while in parallel lay down a firm foundation of primary healthcare infrastructure and health workforce as a platform for implementing UHC. We urge Inter-agency and Expert Group on SDG indicators to consider a new indicator of 3.8.3 on prevalence of unmet healthcare needs which is a flip side of SDG 3.8.2 on prevalence of catastrophic health spending.

Acknowledgements

We thank Waritta Wangbanjongkun for her contribution in retrieving essential data in Table.

Ethical issues

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization WPan, WW, WPat, and VT; writing original draft preparation VT; writing review and editing WPan, WW, and WPat, VT. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

1. Nannini M, Biggeri M, Putoto G. Health coverage and financial protection in Uganda: a political economy perspective. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11(9):1894-1904. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.116 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
2. Initiatives for Social and Economic Rights. The National Health Insurance Bill 2019; submission to the health committee of the Parliament. https://www.iser-uganda.org/images/downloads/NHIS_Bill_ISER_Policy_Brief.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2019.
3. Atukunda R. Advocates pushed for enactment of National Health Insurance Scheme Bill into Law. https://softpower.ug/advocates-push-for-enactment-of-national-health-insurance-scheme-bill-into-law/.
4. World Health Organization. Health Workforce Support and Safeguards List 2020. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
5. World Health Organization. Health workforce thresholds for supporting attainment of universal health coverage in the African Region. Brazzaville: World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa; 2021.
6. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
7. Our World in Data. Coronavirus vaccination. 2022. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations.
8. African CDC. COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions: a 15-country study. 2021. https://africacdc.org/download/covid-19-vaccine-perceptions-a-15-country-study/?ind=1615395834594&filename=COVID-19%20Perception%20Survey%20Final%20Report%2020.02.2021.pdf&wpdmdl=7737&refresh=62ebd16e6f5d81659621742.
9. Govender K, Nyamaruze P, McKerrow N, Meyer-Weitz A, Cowden RG. COVID-19 vaccines for children and adolescents in Africa: aligning our priorities to situational realities. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7(2):e007839. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007839 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
10. United Nations Department of Economicand Social Affairs. The World Economic Situation and Prospects 2022. New York: United Nations; 2022.
11. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Global Humanitarian Overview 2022. New York: United Nations; 2022.
12. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Horn of Africa Drought: Humanitarian Update. New York: United Nations; 2022.
13. Jowett M, Brunal MP, Flores G, Cylus J. Spending targets for health: no magic number. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
14. World Health Organization. The world health report: health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
15. Leonardo Alves T, Lexchin J, Mintzes B. Medicines Information and the Regulation of the Promotion of Pharmaceuticals. Sci Eng Ethics 2019; 25(4):1167-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0041-5 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
16. Zabrodina V, Dusheiko M, Moschetti K. A moneymaking scan: Dual reimbursement systems and supplier-induced demand for diagnostic imaging. Health Economics 2020; 29(12):1566-1585. doi: 10.1002/hec.4152 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
17. Sparkes SP, Eozenou PH, Evans D, Kurowski C, Kutzin J, Tandon A. Will the Quest for UHC be Derailed?. Health Syst Reform 2021; 7(2):e1929796. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2021.1929796 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
18. Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Panichkriangkrai W, Patcharanarumol W, Mills A. Health systems development in Thailand: a solid platform for successful implementation of universal health coverage. Lancet 2018; 391(10126):1205-1223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30198-3 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]