Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg March 2, 2021

A Note on Unemployment of Unskilled Labor due to COVID-19 led Restriction on Migration and Trade

  • Biswajit Mandal EMAIL logo , Saswati Chaudhuri and Alaka Shree Prasad
From the journal Review of Economics

Abstract

To combat COVID-19 the entire world has resorted to global lockdown implying restriction on international labor migration and trade. This paper aims to check the effect of such restrictions on the unemployment of unskilled labor in the source country. In competitive general equilibrium framework with three goods and four factors, restriction on migration raises unemployment for given factor intensity. The results remain same even in a slightly different structure of the economy. In case of trade restriction, however, the rise or fall in unemployment depends on both the structure of the economy and the factor intensity assumption.

JEL Classification: D5; F22; F12; J6

Corresponding author: Biswajit Mandal, Department of Economics & Politics, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the editor of the journal and the anonymous reviewer for their support in publishing this article. We are also thankful for the comments and suggestions provided by the participants of webinars held during the lockdown phase. However, the usual disclaimer applies.

  1. Conflict of interest statement: There is no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix A

Determination of wage in sector Z

The wage is determined by the labor unions by maximizing their utility function subject to the labor demand. We assume the firms to be price takers. Let the utility function of the union be: U(w, LZ, pZ); where w is the wage rate, LZ is the employment in Z, pZ is the relative price of Z. U is quasi-concave and increasing in w and LZ.

The labor demand function is LZ = Zcw = LZ (w, r), here r is the rent of K, cw is the partial derivative of the cost function, c(w, r), and Z is the output. The demand for labor is negatively related to wage.

The first order condition implies δu/δwδu/δLZ=δLZδw

MRSw,LZ = Slope of the labor demand curve

The wage rate is determined from the above condition. The second order condition of the maximization problem also holds:

δ2uδw2+2δ2uδwδLZδLZδw+δ2uδLZ2(δLZδw)2+δuδLZδ2LZδw2<0

Appendix B

Expressing relative change by “ˆ” notation, from Equations (1)–(3) we get,

(B.1)wˆSθSX+RˆθTX+rˆθKX=PˆX
(B.2)wˆSθSY+rˆθKY=0
(B.3)rˆ=0

Putting the value of rˆ in (B.2), wˆS=0. Following this, from (B.1), Rˆ=PˆXθTX.

As wˆS=rˆ=0, the input coefficients of Y and Z remains unchanged. However, because of change in R, there will be changes in factor requirements of X. For simplicity, we assume aˆKX=0. Then, using the Envelope condition and the elasticity of substitution we get, aˆSX=σX(1θKX)PˆX<0 and aˆTX=σXθSX(1θKX)θTXPˆX>0

Using (5)(8) we have

(B.4)λLEYYˆ+λLEZZˆ=LˆE
(B.5)λSXXˆ+λSXaˆSX+λSYYˆ=0
(B.6)Xˆ=aˆTX<0
(B.7)λKXXˆ+λKYYˆ+λKZZˆ=0

Substituting the value of Xˆ in (B.5)

(B.8)Yˆ=λSXλSY(aˆSXaˆTX)Yˆ=λSXλSYσXPˆXθTX>0

Using the value of Xˆ and Yˆ in (B.7)

(B.9)Zˆ=λKXλKZaˆTX-λKYλKZ-λSXλSYaˆSX-aˆTXZˆ=σXPˆXθTXλSYλKZθSXλSXλKY-λSYλKX+λKYλSYθTX

Here, following the factor intensity assumptions of the model, (λSXλKY  λSYλKX) > 0. Therefore, as PˆX<0, Zˆ<0.

From (B.4),

LˆE=σXPˆXθTXλSYλKZ(1θKX){(λLEYλKZλLEZλKY)λSX(1θKX)+λLEZλKXθSXλSY}<0

Since Z is L intensive and Y is K intensive, a fall in PX reduces the level of employment of unskilled labors.

Appendix C

From Equations (15)–(17) we get,

(C.1)wˆSθSX+rˆθKX=PˆX
(C.2)wˆSθSY+rˆθKY=0
(C.3)Rˆ=0

From (C.2), rˆ=wˆSθSYθKY. Putting this in (C.1) we get, wˆS=(θKYθSXθKYθSYθKX)PˆX<0, as PˆX<0, and X and Y are S and K intensive, respectively. Using the obtained value of wˆS, we calculate rˆ=θSYθSXθKYθSYθKXPˆX>0.

With changes in wS and r there are changes in the per unit factor requirements of X and Y. Using the Envelope condition and the elasticity of substitution between S and K in X, σX, we get

aˆSX=θKX(1θLY)σXθSXθKYθSYθKXPˆX>0
aˆKX=θSX(1θLY)σXθSXθKYθSYθKXPˆX<0

Similarly, assuming aˆLY=0, we obtain

aˆSY=θKYσYθSXθKYθSYθKXPˆX>0
aˆKY=θSYσYθSXθKYθSYθKXPˆX<0

Following this, using Equations (18)–(21)

(C.4)λSXXˆ+λSYYˆ+λSXaˆSX+λSYaˆSY=0
(C.5)λLEYYˆ+λLEZZˆ=LˆE
(C.6)Zˆ=0
(C.7)λKXXˆ+λKYYˆ+λKXaˆKX+λKYaˆKY=0

Using Cramer’s rule, from (C.4) and (C.7) we get the following values

Xˆ=λSY(λKXaˆKX+λKYaˆKY)λKY(λSXaˆSX+λSYaˆSY)λSXλKYλSYλKX<0
Yˆ=λKX(λSXaˆSX+λSYaˆSY)λSX(λKXaˆKX+λKYaˆKY)λSXλKYλSYλKX>0

From (C.5), LˆE=λLEYYˆ

LˆE=λLEY{λKX(λSXaˆSX+λSYaˆSY)λSX(λKXaˆKX+λKYaˆKY)}λSXλKYλSYλKX>0

References

Acharyya, R. and Kar, S. (2014). International trade and economic development. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672851.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Agénor, P.R., and Montiel, P.J. (2015). Development macroeconomics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Bound, J., Khanna, G., and Morales, N. (2017). Understanding the economic impact of the H-1B program on the US (No. w23153). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U. (2010). Revisiting the informal sector: a general equilibrium approach. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-1-4419-1194-0Search in Google Scholar

Das, G., Marjit, S., and Kar, M. (2019). Skill, innovation and wage inequality: can immigrants be the trump card? CESifo, Munich, Working Paper No. 7794.Search in Google Scholar

Gruen, F., and Max Corden, W. (1970). A tariff that worsens the terms of trade. In: McDougal, I., and Snape, R. (Eds.), Studies in international economics. North-Holland Publishing Co., North Holland, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R.W. (1965). The structure of simple general equilibrium models. J. Polit. Econ. 73: 557–572.10.1142/9789813200678_0004Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R.W. (1971). A three-factor model in theory, trade and history. In: Bhagwati, J., Jones, R.W., Mundell, R.A., and Vanek, J. (Eds.), Trade, balance of payments and growth. North-Holland Pub. Co, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 3–21.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, R.W. and Marjit, S. (1992). International trade and endogenous production structures. In: Economic theory and international trade. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 173–195.10.1007/978-3-642-77671-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Mandal, B. and Mandal, A. (2015). A note on how and why growth and unemployment go hand in hand in developing economies. Int. Econ. J. 29: 681–693.10.1080/10168737.2015.1025806Search in Google Scholar

Marjit, S. and Acharyya, R. (2003). International trade, wage inequality and the developing economy: a general equilibrium approach. Physica - Verlag, Heidelberg; New York.10.1007/978-3-642-57422-1Search in Google Scholar

Marjit, S. and Kar, S. (2011). The outsiders: economic reform and informal labour in a developing economy. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198071495.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mayda, A.M., Ortega, F., Peri, G., Shih, K., and Sparber, C. (2018). The effect of the H-1B quota on the employment and selection of foreign-born labor. Eur. Econ. Rev. 108: 105–128.10.3386/w23902Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-09-24
Accepted: 2021-01-21
Published Online: 2021-03-02
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/roe-2020-0030/html
Scroll to top button