Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact preprints@lancet.com.
Low Seroprevalence of COVID-19 in Lao PDR, Late 2020
23 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2021
More...Abstract
Background: Lao PDR has low reported COVID-19 cases but it is unclear whether this masks silent transmission. A nationwide seroprevalence study was done between August and September 2020 to determine SARS-CoV-2 exposure.
Methods: Participants were from the general community/healthcare workers in five provinces. Bat/wildlife contacts were from Vientiane province. ELISAs detected anti-Nucleoprotein (N; n=3173 tested) and anti-Spike (S; n=1417 tested) SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Double-positive samples were checked by IgM/IgG rapid tests. Positive controls were confirmed COVID-19 cases and negative controls were pre-COVID-19 samples.
Findings: In pre-COVID-19 samples, 14/265 (5·3%, [95% CI=3·1-8·7%]) were anti-N antibody single-positive and 3/265 (1·1% [0·3-3·5%]) were anti-S antibody single positive. None were anti-N and anti-S antibody double positive. Anti-N and anti-S antibodies were detected in 131/2417 (5·4% [4·5-6·3%]) and 19/1061 (1·8% [1·1-2·8%]) of the general population, 13/666 (2·0% [1·1-3·3%]) and 4/282 (1·4% [0·5-3·7%]) of healthcare workers and 15/74 (20·3% [12·6-31·0%]) and 5/74 (6·8% [2·8-15·3%]) of bat/wildlife contacts. Only 2/3173 (0·1% [0·02-0·3%]) were double positive for anti-N and anti-S antibodies (rapid test negative).
Interpretation: We find no evidence for significant circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in Lao PDR during or before September 2020. This likely results from decisive measures taken by the government early in the pandemic, social behavior, and low population density. High anti-N antibodies/low anti-S antibodies in bat/wildlife contacts may indicate exposure to cross-reactive animal coronaviruses with threat of emerging novel viruses.
Funding: Core; Agence Française de Développement. Additional support; Institut Pasteur du Laos, Institute Pasteur, Paris and Luxembourg Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs (“PaReCIDS II”).
Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethics Approval Statement: The study protocol was approved by all participating institutes and by the Lao National Ethics Committee for Health Research (NECHR) (Ref #052/2020).
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation