Original article
Sexual and Gender Minority Young Adult Coping Disparities During the COVID-19 Pandemic

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.07.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated several existing health disparities in the U.S. Sexual and gender minority (SGM) health disparities may also be widening during the pandemic, though few studies have assessed this question. This study examined SGM young adult disparities in health-related behaviors to cope with isolation during the pandemic.

Methods

Respondents from a prospective cohort of Southern California young adults (N = 2,298) reported whether they engaged in various strategies (e.g., substance use, diet, exercise, relaxation) to cope with isolation during the pandemic (each: yes/no). Differences in coping were assessed across five SGM subgroups: heterosexual men and women, lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer (LGBQ) men and women, transgender/nonbinary (TNB) respondents. Negative binomial regressions estimated sexual/gender identity differences in the number of positive or negative behaviors endorsed, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and prepandemic health behaviors. Differences were also tested across individual coping behaviors.

Results

Heterosexual women (IRR = 1.11 [1.01–1.21]), LGBQ men (IRR = 1.31 [1.12–1.54]), LGBQ women (IRR = 1.33 [1.19–1.49]), and TNB respondents (IRR = 1.29 [1.03–1.61]) engaged in more negative coping behaviors than heterosexual men. LGBQ men (IRR = 1.19 [1.02–1.39]) and LGBQ women (IRR = 1.20 [1.08–1.34]) also reported more negative coping behaviors versus heterosexual women. Generally, LGBQ men reported the highest prevalence of substance use, while LGBQ women and TNB reported the highest prevalence of adverse eating behaviors and self-harm.

Conclusions

SGM young adults may be disproportionately, adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Tailored public health and clinical interventions are needed to decrease pandemic-related SGM health disparities.

Section snippets

Study design

Data were from a prospective cohort of young adults in Southern California, originally recruited in fall 2013 from 10 Los Angeles, CA metropolitan area high schools, when students were in ninth grade (mean age: 14.1; N = 3,396). Respondents have since been surveyed repeatedly, with biannual surveys conducted throughout high school and roughly annual surveys administered following the completion of high school in 2017. Further details about the study design can be found elsewhere [32]. Data from

Sample characteristics

In the sample (N = 2,298), 792 (34.5%) were heterosexual men, 1,021 (44.4%) were heterosexual women, 120 (5.2%) were LGBQ men, 313 (13.6%) were LGBQ women, and 52 (2.3%) were TNB (Table 1), consistent with national estimates [36]. There were several demographic differences by sexual/gender identity. The groups differed by race/ethnicity (p = .005), with for instance, higher proportions of heterosexual women (57.8%) and LGBQ women (59.7%) reporting they were Latinx, compared to heterosexual men

Discussion

This study provides new evidence that young adults have used a wide range of behavioral strategies to cope with social distancing and isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic, with key differences noted between SGM and non-SGM young adults. Namely, SGM (vs. non-SGM) respondents were more likely to engage in negative, but less so positive, coping strategies. All SGM subgroups reported engaging in a higher number of negative coping behaviors than heterosexual men, as well as heterosexual women

Funding Sources

This project was supported in part by award numbers U54CA180905 and R01CA229617 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), award number 27-IR-0034 from the California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP), and award number K01DA042950 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

References (39)

  • G. Phillips et al.

    Addressing the disproportionate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and gender minority populations in the United States: Actions toward equity

    LGBT health

    (2020)
  • B. Lovelace

    Doctors worry coronavirus pandemic may hit LGBTQ people harder than most

    (2020)
  • D. Banerjee et al.

    “The Untold Side of COVID-19”: Struggle and perspectives of the sexual minorities

    J Psychosexual Health

    (2020)
  • J.K. Gibb et al.

    Sexual and gender minority health vulnerabilities during the COVID-19 health crisis

    Am J Hum Biol

    (2020)
  • K.K. O’Neill

    Health vulnerabilities to COVID-19 among LGBT adults in California

    (2020)
  • K.K. O’Neill

    Economic vulnerabilities to COVID-19 among LGBT Adults in California

    (2020)
  • J.L. Herman et al.

    Vulnerabilities to COVID-19 among transgender adults in the U.S.

    (2020)
  • E.A. Krueger et al.

    Are sociodemographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial characteristics associated with sexual orientation group differences in mental health disparities? Results from a national population-based study

    Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

    (2019)
  • J.N. Fish et al.

    Cigarette smoking disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth

    Pediatrics

    (2019)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Changes in sexual identity and substance use during young adulthood

      2022, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, the follow-up wave of data collection occurred between May–August, 2020, around the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns, when overall substance use increased in certain groups and decreased in others. While sexual identity change-based disparities in substance use should not theoretically be affected by the pandemic, we cannot rule out the possibility that COVID-19 related stress (Salerno et al., 2020) and differential coping behaviors observed between LGBQ+ and heterosexual young adults (Krueger et al., 2021) contributed to our findings. This study provides evidence in support of the association between LGBQ+ identity and substance use.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest: All study authors have indicated that they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

    Clinical trial registration: Not applicable.

    View full text