Elsevier

Journal of Business Research

Volume 147, August 2022, Pages 108-123
Journal of Business Research

Assessing IoT challenges in supply chain: A comparative study before and during- COVID-19 using interval valued neutrosophic analytical hierarchy process

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.036Get rights and content

Abstract

Although the Internet of Things (IoT) has spawned a new breed of smart factories within supply chains, the latest pandemic has ushered in unparalleled supply chain disturbances. Following the challenges identified in the literature, we interview top experts to evaluate the significance of these challenges. We apply a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in combination with interval-valued neutrosophic numbers (IVN). The critical part of this research is that we also perform a comparative analysis by focusing on before- and during- the pandemic periods individually to better assess the impact of the latest pandemic on the IoT challenges. Our study also includes a comprehensive, systematic literature review to bring the readers up-to-date.

Introduction

The world has been going through COVID-19 pandemic, anxiously waiting for vaccination to be completed. As scientists have developed vaccines in record time, the heat is now on for the supply chains for the delivery. The urgency of the production and logistics of billions of jabs to be distributed worldwide has put the supply chain performance under the spotlight. In the wake of the age of digitalization and heavy computer usage, a new era of further-digitized and interconnected large-scale machine-to-machine (M2M) networks have been revolutionized the supply chains (SC). These M2M information exchanges, known as the Internet of Things (IoT), have connoted the fourth industrial revolution, also known as Industry 4.0 (i4.0). The pandemic has disrupted SCs going through this revolutionary transition to i4.0 even further.

There is an echo of recent literature heralding a great wave of disruption taking place. i4.0, also known as Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has been spawning a new breed of real-timecapable smart factories (Kiel, Arnold, & Voigt, 2017). The automatic capture of data with sensors, making them accessible to authorized entities both internally and externally, using data analytics for advanced processes securely go beyond digitalization (Ben-Daya, Hassini, & Bahroun, 2019). These capable factories, hallmarked by IoT, laden with the state-of-the art such as smart sensors and big data analytics, buttressed by law and administration are restructuring the traditional ways of manufacturing. While autonomous standalone factories with smart-capabilities are essential, the literature insists that all processes in SCs must be digitalized, integrated, and automated to realize i4.0 (Bauer et al., 2015, Hofmann and Rüsch, 2017, Tjahjono et al., 2017). Despite the rapid growth of IIoT research, IIoT’s merits on supply chains are frequently surmised, and its implications are often misidentified (Müller, Kiel, & Voigt, 2018).

Most manufacturing companies are oblivious to the extent to which their organization will be impacted by IIoT absorption. Even though the research on IIoT technologies consistently underlines their potential benefits (Moeuf et al., 2020, Prause, 2019, Raj et al., 2020, Whitmore et al., 2015), the extant literature also posits uncertainties such as, but is not limited to, the managerial (Birkel and Hartmann, 2020, Tu, 2018), environmental (Wang & Wang, 2017), or social uncertainties of IIoT (Shah, Bolton, & Menon, 2020). While using real-time, reliable, secure, and timely data processing can help create flexible and resilient supply chains, there is a diverse set of highly complex factors, risks and challenges that must be identified, analyzed, and resolved (Birkel & Hartmann, 2019). The recent COVID-19 pandemic has increased these factors even further in complexity.

Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) aims to assess and eliminate the risks to ensure continuity (Heckmann, Comes, & Nickel, 2015). Although the research on SCRM and IIoT is rather limited (Birkel & Hartmann, 2020), addressing the potential benefits of IIoT technologies within supply chains such as agility, flexibility and resilience has gained prominence. To build more capable supply chains, it is particularly important to understand both the issues that supply chains face during the pandemic and the implications of the pandemic on the IIoT use in supply chains. These two matters bolster the importance of managing the challenges of IIoT technologies in supply chains during a pandemic. There have been recent studies to establish a framework for classifying the potential challenges and risks associated with IIoT in supply chains. In IIoT, risks ensue the challenges. Challenges and risks – as the consequent of challenges – impact the realization of the expected gains due to IIoT adoption. To the best of our knowledge, no attempt has been made to quantify the importance of challenges associated with IIoT and supply chains. Furthermore, embedding the impact of the currently ongoing pandemic on studying these challenges could help grasp the future of IIoT in supply chains.

Our research question is: “Given the risk and challenge framework of using IIoT for supply chains, how does the pandemic affect the relative importance of the challenges of IIoT in supply chains”. In response to this question, we structure the rest of this article as follows. We offer a comprehensive and systematic literature review, and theoretical background in the next section. We describe our proposed methodology in Section 3. Section 4 is dedicated to the challenge assessment using our proposed methodology. The paper closes with conclusion and discussion section.

Section snippets

Literature review and theoretical background

The academic literature on the nascent field of IIoT is rapidly growing. Earlier studies mostly emphasize the positive effects of using IIoT such as better transportation (Harris, Wang, & Wang, 2015), better inventory management (Mathaba, Adigun, Oladosu, & Oki, 2017), higher customer satisfaction (Jie, Subramanian, Ning, & Edwards, 2015), quality improvements in logistics (Gu & Liu, 2013) and expanding the financial benefits (Verdouw, Beulens, & Van Der Vorst, 2013). Studies focusing on the

The proposed methodology

The proposed methodology comprises three stages as shown in Fig. 2. The related stages are preparation, interval-valued neutrosophic AHP, and comparison with evaluation. During the first stage, we first provide a clear definition of the research problem in the first step. We then determine the set of experts. Finally, a systematic literature review and expert discussions are used to determine the key and sub-challenges. In the second stage, IVN-AHP is used to compute the importance weights

Assessment of challenges via the application of the proposed methodology

We implement the suggested methodology in three stages, with the findings presented in the sections below.

Conclusion and discussion

Without a doubt, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted nearly every aspect of our lives, including business organizations and supply chains. Traditional supply chains have had issues that lead to supply shortages and flow interruptions. IIoT, with its underutilized potential, and available features are being used to address these issues. However, its implementation involves a set of challenges that have been itemized in prior research. The key purpose of this study is to quantify the importance

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Enes Eryarsoy: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Huseyin Selcuk Kilic: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis. Selim Zaim: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision. Marzhan Doszhanova: Data curation.

Dr. Enes Eryarsoy is an Associate Professor of Information Systems in Sabanci Business School at Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey. He received his Ph.D. degree from Warrington College of Business at the University of Florida in 2005. His research lies on different facets of the field defined by machine learning, statistics and operations research.

References (62)

  • KilicH.S. et al.

    Development of a hybrid methodology for ERP system selection: The case of turkish airlines

    Decision Support Systems

    (2014)
  • KumarK. et al.

    Role of IoT to avoid spreading of COVID-19

    International Journal of Intelligent Networks

    (2020)
  • ManavalanE. et al.

    A review of internet of things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements

    Computers & Industrial Engineering

    (2019)
  • MasoodT. et al.

    Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs

    Computers in Industry

    (2020)
  • OtoomM. et al.

    An IoT-based framework for early identification and monitoring of COVID-19 cases

    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

    (2020)
  • RajA. et al.

    Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective

    International Journal of Production Economics

    (2020)
  • RowanN.J. et al.

    Challenges and solutions for addressing critical shortage of supply chain for personal and protective equipment (PPE) arising from coronavirus disease (COVID19) pandemic–case study from the Republic of Ireland

    Science of the Total Environment

    (2020)
  • SinghR.P. et al.

    Internet of things (IoT) applications to fight against COVID-19 pandemic

    Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews

    (2020)
  • TjahjonoB. et al.

    What does industry 4.0 mean to supply chain?

    Procedia Manufacturing

    (2017)
  • VerdouwC.N. et al.

    Virtualisation of floricultural supply chains: A review from an internet of things perspective

    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

    (2013)
  • Abdel-BassetM. et al.

    An extension of neutrosophic AHP–SWOT analysis for strategic planning and decision-making

    Symmetry

    (2018)
  • AryalA. et al.

    The emerging big data analytics and IoT in supply chain management: A systematic review

    Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

    (2018)
  • BartikA.W. et al.

    The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2020)
  • BaruaS.

    Understanding coronanomics: The economic implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

    (2020)
  • Ben-DayaM. et al.

    Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review

    International Journal of Productions Research

    (2019)
  • BirkelH.S. et al.

    Impact of IoT challenges and risks for SCM

    Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

    (2019)
  • BirkelH.S. et al.

    Internet of things–the future of managing supply chain risks

    Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

    (2020)
  • BolturkE. et al.

    A novel interval-valued neutrosophic AHP with cosine similarity measure

    Soft Computing

    (2018)
  • BonissoneP.P. et al.

    Multicriteria decision making (MCDM): A framework for research and applications

    IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine

    (2009)
  • CrownG.

    Multicriteria analysis

    (2009)
  • DongY. et al.

    Iot platform for COVID-19 prevention and control: A survey

    Ieee Access

    (2021)
  • Cited by (11)

    • A computational trust model for social IoT based on interval neutrosophic numbers

      2022, Information Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, they used neutrosophic sets theory to model vague, uncertain, inconsistent, and incomplete information in data evaluations. In [46], the authors applied multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and AHP in combination with interval-valued neutrosophic numbers to perform a comparative analysis of IoT supply chains. In that study, expert opinions were analyzed using MCDA and AHP processes, in which uncertainty was considered using neutrosophic numbers.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr. Enes Eryarsoy is an Associate Professor of Information Systems in Sabanci Business School at Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey. He received his Ph.D. degree from Warrington College of Business at the University of Florida in 2005. His research lies on different facets of the field defined by machine learning, statistics and operations research.

    Dr. Huseyin Selcuk Kilic works for the Department of Industrial Engineering at Marmara University. He received the B.Sc.,M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering from Istanbul Technical University. He studied in-plant logistics design for his Ph.D. dissertation. His main research areas are in-plant logistics, reverse logistics, lean production, multi-criteria decision-making techniques and ergonomics. He has research papers in journals that include Applied Mathematical Modelling, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Decision Support Systems, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, and Assembly Automation.

    Dr. Selim Zaim is a Professor in Industrial Engineering Department at Istanbul Sebahattin Zaim University, Turkey. Dr. Zaim holds Ph.D. in Operations Management (1994) from Istanbul University, Turkey. His research area is Operations Management, and he has different articles published in international academic journals.

    Marzhan Doszhanova is a research assistant and a Ph.D. student at Khalifa University in UAE. She received her M.Sc. from Istanbul Sehir University, Turkey.

    View full text