Abstract
Drawing from psychological reactance theory (PRT), this study sought to attain a better understanding on the extent to which psychological reactance is associated with motivation to restore freedom, as manifested in health-related attitudes/behaviors during the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we focused on (1) comparing levels of psychological reactance and health-related attitudes and behaviors between Norwegian and Swedish participants, given the divergent approaches followed by these two nations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) examining whether psychological reactance to COVID-19 restrictions moderated associations between COVID-19 risk perception, trust in government, pro-sociality, and COVID-19 health-related attitudes/behaviors. Four hundred and twelve participants (Norway = 196, Sweden = 216) completed measures of psychological reactance to COVID-19 restrictions, COVID-19 risk perception, trust in government, pro-sociality, and COVID-19 health-related attitudes/behaviors (i.e. vaccination intentions, anti-vaccination attitudes, and compliance with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs)). Participants from Norway reported higher psychological reactance to COVID-19 restrictions and anti-vaccination attitudes, and lower COVID-19 risk perception, pro-sociality, vaccination intentions, and compliance with NPIs than participants from Sweden. Moderation analyses revealed that participants showing low psychological reactance reported relatively high vaccination intentions, compliance with NPIs, and relatively low anti-vaccination attitudes, regardless of their reported levels of COVID-19 risk perception, trust in government, and pro-sociality. However, high levels of psychological reactance were not always related to the outcome variables; such association depended on the levels of COVID-19 risk perception, trust in government, and pro-sociality. These results suggest that the relationship between psychological reactance and health-related attitudes/behaviors may be more nuanced than previously believed.

Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Data availability
The data from the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Notes
By March 24th, Norway had reported 90,104 cases of COVID-19 and 656 deaths, compared to 765,984 and 13,357 in Sweden, respectively. By the end of May, around 30% of Norwegians and 35% of Swedes had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (Ritchie et al., 2020).
References
Askim, J., & Bergström, T. (2021). Between lockdown and calm down. Comparing the COVID-19 responses of Norway and Sweden. Local Government Studies, 48(2), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1964477
Ball, H., & Wozniak, T. R. (2022). Why do some americans resist COVID-19 prevention behavior? An analysis of issue importance, message fatigue, and reactance regarding COVID-19 messaging. Health Communication, 37(14), 1812–1819. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1920717
Brauner, J. M., Mindermann, S., Sharma, M., Johnston, D., Salvatier, J., Gavenčiak, T., Stephenson, A. B., Leech, G., Altman, G., Mikulik, V., Norman, A. J., Monrad, J. T., Besiroglu, T., Ge, H., Hartwick, M. A., Teh, Y. W., Chindelevitch, L., Gal, Y., & Kulveit, J. (2021). Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd9338
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic.
Cameron, E. E., Nuzzo, J. B., & Bell, J. A. (2019). Global health security index: Building collective action and accountability. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. https://www.ghsindex.org/
Chazan, G., & Mallet, V. (2021). Europe adopts carrot-and-stick approach towards vaccine refuseniks. Financial Times.https://www.ft.com/content/10c5954c-9dc4-4da6-acdc-37e446f49049
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
Díaz, R., & Cova, F. (2022). Reactance, morality, and disgust: The relationship between affective dispositions and compliance with official health recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cognition & Emotion, 36(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.1941783
Dillard, J. P., Tian, X., Cruz, S. M., Smith, R. A., & Shen, L. (2023). Persuasive messages, social norms, and reactance: A study of masking behavior during a COVID-19 campus health campaign. Health Communication, 38(7), 1338–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2007579
Dodd, R. H., Pickles, K., Nickel, B., Cvejic, E., Ayre, J., Batcup, C., Bonner, C., Copp, T., Cornell, S., Dakin, T., Isautier, J., & McCaffery, K. J. (2021). Concerns and motivations about COVID-19 vaccination. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 21(2), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30926-9
Ertesvåg, E. R. (2021). Nytt angrep på vaksinemotstandere:– Av og til er det på sin plass å bare være surk*k. Nettavisen. https://www.nettavisen.no/12-95-3424213276
European Commission. (2021). Coronavirus: Commission proposes a digital green certificate. European Commission - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1181
Galea, S., & Abdalla, S. M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment, and civil unrest: Underlying deep racial and socioeconomic divides. Jama, 324(3), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.11132
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D’Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., & Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
Grimm, P. Y., & Saulnier, D. D. (2021). Civic duty: A booster for resilience? International Journal of Public Health, 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021.1604064
Harder, T., Külper-Schiek, W., Reda, S., Treskova-Schwarzbach, M., Koch, J., Vygen-Bonnet, S., & Wichmann, O. (2021). Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the delta (B.1.617.2) variant: Second interim results of a living systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 january to 25 august 2021. Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Europeen Sur Les Maladies Transmissibles = European Communicable Disease Bulletin, 26(41). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.41.2100920
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Helsingen, L. M., Refsum, E., Gjøstein, D. K., Løberg, M., Bretthauer, M., Kalager, M., & Emilsson, L. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden– threats, trust, and impact on daily life: A comparative survey. BMC Public Health, (20).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09615-3
Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., & Tukey, J. W. (1986). Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 991–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363
Jackson, S., Weiss, M., Schwarenberg, A., Nelson, R., Sutter, K., & Sutherland, M. (2021). Global economic effects of COVID-19. Congressional Research Services. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1152929
Karlsson, L. C., Soveri, A., Lewandowsky, S., Karlsson, L., Karlsson, H., Nolvi, S., Karukivi, M., Lindfelt, M., & Antfolk, J. (2021). Fearing the disease or the vaccine: The case of COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 172, 110590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110590
Kerr, J., Panagopoulos, C., & van der Linden, S. (2021a). Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, 110892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892
Kerr, J., Schneider, C. R., Recchia, G., Dryhurst, S., Sahlin, U., Dufouil, C., Arwidson, P., Freeman, A. L., & van der Linden, S. (2021b). Correlates of intended COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across time and countries: Results from a series of cross-sectional surveys. British Medical Journal Open, 11(8), e048025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048025
Kluge, H., & McKee, M. (2021). COVID-19 vaccines for the European region: An unprecedented challenge. The Lancet, 397(10286), 1689–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00709-1
Krpan, D., & Dolan, P. (2021). You must stay at home! The impact of commands on behaviors during COVID-19. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 333–346.
Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474549
Martin, L. R., & Petrie, K. J. (2017). Understanding the dimensions of anti-vaccination attitudes: The vaccination attitudes examination (VAX) scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(5), 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9888-y
Osama, T., Razai, M. S., & Majeed, A. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine passports: Access, equity, and ethics. BMJ 373. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n861
Plohl, N., & Musil, B. (2021). Modelling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. Psychology Health & Medicine, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988
Plohl, N., & Musil, B. (2023). Trust in science moderates the effects of high/low threat communication on psychological reactance to COVID-19-related public health messages. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 16(4), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2023.2279395
Recio-Vivas, A. M., Mansilla-Domíngez, J. M., Belzunegui-Eraso, Á., Peña-Otero, D., Díaz-Pérez, D., Lorenzo-Allegue, L., & Font-Jiménez, I. (2022). Compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures in the Spanish population during the new normal: Will the need for greater community involvement be one of the lessons learned? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315983
Reynolds-Tylus, T. (2019). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Communication, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056
Richards, A. S., Bessarabova, E., Banas, J. A., & Bernard, D. R. (2022). Reducing psychological reactance to health promotion messages: Comparing preemptive and postscript mitigation strategies. Health Communication, 37(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1839203
Ritchie, H., Mathieu, E., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Giattino, C., Ortiz-Ospina, E., Hasell, J., Macdonald, B., Beltekian, D., & Roser, M. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Our World in Data. Retrieved Nov 4, 2021, from https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus
Rosenberg, B. D., & Siegel, J. T. (2018). A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Science, 4(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091
Rostad, I. L. (2021). Tromsø blir første i landet som innfører koronasertifikat. Nrk. https://www.nrk.no/tromsogfinnmark/tromso-blir-forste-i-landet-som-innforer-koronasertifikat-1.15736824
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2003). Introduction: Social capital in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(1), 1–26.
Shelley, J., & Iddiols, R. (2021). Violent clashes erupt during anti-lockdown demonstrations in Europe. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/21/europe/europe-lockdown-protests-violence-intl/index.html
Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., Steindl, C., & Jonas, E. (2015). Salzburger state reactance scale (SSR scale). Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223(4), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000227
Soveri, A., Karlsson, L. C., Antfolk, J., Lindfelt, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2021). Unwillingness to engage in behaviors that protect against COVID-19: The role of conspiracy beliefs, trust, and endorsement of complementary and alternative medicine. Bmc Public Health, 21(1), 684. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10643-w
Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 223(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000222
Travaini, G., Flutti, E., Blandi, L., Sala, R., Songhorian, S., Caruso, P., & Mugellini, G. (2023). Compliance with recommended preventive behaviours and restrictions for covid-19: An exploratory analysis of italians’ attitudes. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 94(S3), e2023182. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14431
Trent, M., Seale, H., Chughtai, A. A., Salmon, D., & MacIntyre, C. R. (2021). Trust in government, intention to vaccinate and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A comparative survey of five large cities in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.048
Willsher, K. (2021). Fifth consecutive weekend of protests in France over covid pass. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/14/fifth-consecutive-weekend-of-protests-in-france-over-covid-pass#:~:text=Protesters%20took%20to%20the%20streets,had%20turned%20out%20last%20week
Wise, J. (2021). Covid-19: European countries suspend use of oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine after reports of blood clots. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 372, n699. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n699
Wong, W. H., & Wong, E. A. (2020). What COVID-19 revealed about health, human rights, and the WHO. Journal of Human Rights, 19(5), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1819778
World Health Organization (2021). Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard.https://covid19.who.int
Wright, L., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. (2022). Trajectories of compliance with COVID-19 related guidelines: Longitudinal analyses of 50,000 UK adults. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 56(8), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.13.21255336. https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR312515
Yarmol-Matusiak, E. A., Cipriano, L. E., & Stranges, S. (2021). A comparison of COVID-19 epidemiological indicators in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494820980264
Funding
No funding was obtained for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the ethics committee of Universidad Europea de Madrid (ID # CIPI/21/011). The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aguirre-Camacho, A., Forland, T.S.B., Hidalgo, B. et al. Revisiting psychological reactance theory: relationship between psychological reactance and health-related attitudes/behaviors in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Psychol 43, 35697–35708 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06810-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06810-y