Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Humoral immune response characteristics of vulnerable populations against SARS-CoV-2 strains EG.5 and JN.1 after infection with strains BA.5 and XBB

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we compared the humoral immune characteristics of children, elderly individuals, and pregnant women in Guangzhou, China, who had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 strains BA.5 and XBB against the currently predominant strains EG.5 and JN.1. It was discovered that the neutralizing antibody titers in children, elderly individuals, and pregnant women against strains EG.5 and JN.1 were low in individuals who had been infected with strain BA.5, irrespective of their vaccination status. There was a significant positive correlation between the neutralization titers against JN.1 and EG.5 in both the acute and convalescent phases of BA.5 infection. For XBB-infected patients, the sera in the acute stage exhibited a low neutralizing titer against EG.5 and JN.1, whereas the convalescent sera demonstrated a significantly higher neutralizing titer against the two viruses, particularly in infected individuals who had been vaccinated. For XBB-infected patients, there was a strong positive correlation between the serum neutralizing antibody titers against EG.5 and JN.1 in both the acute and recovery phases. This finding provides crucial information for judging the epidemic trend of COVID-19 and the development of vaccines, especially for developing customized vaccines and immune strategies for different populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The source data are provided in this article.

References

  1. Zhu Y et al (2023) International pediatric COVID-19 severity over the course of the pandemic. JAMA Pediatr

  2. Cohen C et al (2022) SARS-CoV-2 incidence, transmission, and reinfection in a rural and an urban setting: results of the PHIRST-C cohort study, South Africa, 2020–21. Lancet Infect Dis 22:821–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00069-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Navarrete J, Qureshi BG, Woods I, Barbre A, Meng K, Novosad L, Li S, Soe Q, Edwards MM, Wong J, Guthrie E, Keenan SH, Lamping J, Park L, Dumbuya M, Benin S, Bell LA (2023) J. Infection and death rates among maintenance dialysis patients during delta and early Omicron waves-United States, June 30, 2021-September 27, 2022. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 72

  4. Pan Y et al (2023) Characterisation of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Beijing during 2022: an epidemiological and phylogenetic analysis. Lancet 401:664–672

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang J et al (2023) Low levels of neutralizing antibodies against XBB Omicron subvariants after BA.5 infection. Signal Transduct Target Therapy 8

  6. Ye C et al (2023) The omicron variant reinfection risk among individuals with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection within one year in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study. Vaccines 11

  7. Nel AE, Miller JF, Nano-Enabled (2021) COVID-19 Vaccines: Meeting the Challenges of Durable Antibody Plus Cellular Immunity and Immune Escape. ACS Nano 15:5793–5818

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Torresi J, Edeling MA, Nolan T, Godfrey DI (2022) A complementary union of SARS-CoV2 natural and vaccine induced immune responses. Front Immunol 13

  9. Murray SM et al (2022) The impact of pre-existing cross-reactive immunity on SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine responses. Nat Rev Immunol 23:304–316

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Manning J et al (2022) SARS-CoV-2 Cross-Reactivity in Prepandemic Serum from Rural Malaria-Infected Persons, Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis 28:440–444

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson EM et al (2022) SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit higher levels of original antigenic sin antibodies compared with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations. Cell Rep 41

  12. Abbasi J (2023) What to Know About EG.5, the Latest SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Interest. JAMA 330:900–901. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.16498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WHO (2023) EG.5 initial risk evaluation

  14. Zhang L et al (2023) Neutralisation sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 lineages EG.5.1 and XBB.2.3. Lancet Infect Dis 23:e391–e392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00547-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pung R et al (2023) Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB subvariants in Singapore. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 37:100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100849

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffmann M et al (2023) Profound neutralization evasion and augmented host cell entry are hallmarks of the fast-spreading SARS-CoV-2 lineage XBB.1.5. Cell Mol Immunol 20:419–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-023-00988-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Looi MK (2023) Covid-19: WHO adds JN.1 as new variant of interest. BMJ 383:2975. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p2975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang S et al (2023) Fast evolution of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 to JN.1 under heavy immune pressure. Lancet Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00744-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhai L et al (2023) Broadly neutralizing antibodies recognizing different antigenic epitopes act synergistically against the influenza B virus. J Med Virol 95:e28106. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Q et al (2023) Antigenicity and receptor affinity of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 spike. Nature 624:639–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06750-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Uriu K et al (2023) Transmissibility, infectivity, and immune evasion of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 variant. Lancet Infect Dis 23:e460–e461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00575-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Creech CB et al (2022) Evaluation of mRNA-1273 Covid-19 Vaccine in Children 6 to 11 Years of Age. N Engl J Med 386:2011–2023

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ouyang F et al (2023) Humoral immune response characteristics of the elderly, children and pregnant women after XBB infection. J Infect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2023.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang X et al (2024) Immune escape of BA.2.86 is comparable to XBB subvariants from the plasma of BA.5- and BA.5-XBB-convalescent subpopulations. J Med Virol 96:e29417. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.29417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao X-J et al (2024) Epidemiological characteristics and antibody kinetics of elderly population with booster vaccination following both Omicron BA.5 and XBB waves in China. J Med Virol 96:e29640. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.29640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin X et al (2021) Homeostatic regulation of T follicular helper and antibody response to particle antigens by IL-1Ra of medullary sinus macrophage origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118(e2019798118). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019798118

  27. Tahtinen S et al (2022) IL-1 and IL-1ra are key regulators of the inflammatory response to RNA vaccines. Nat Immunol 23:532–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-022-01160-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Y et al (2023) A novel nanobody broadly neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 via induction of spike trimer dimers conformation. Explor n/a:20230086. https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20230086

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 32170939 and 82371846), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant number 2022B1515020075), the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF under Grant Number GZC20230605, the President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital Baiyun Branch, Southern Medical University: BYYZ24001 and the Guangdong Science and Technology Program Key Projects (no. 2021B1212030014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.S., S.O., and B.L. contributed to the experimental design. C.S., F.O., and Y.J. contributed to manuscript preparation. H.Z. and Z.L. performed the neutralization assays and contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. T.P. and JZ. enrolled the patients and collected the clinical data.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Chen, Baisheng Li, Chenguang Shen or Wei Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Baiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The funders had no role in the design or conduct of the study, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor Roman Pogranichniy

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Ouyang, S., Qu, Y. et al. Humoral immune response characteristics of vulnerable populations against SARS-CoV-2 strains EG.5 and JN.1 after infection with strains BA.5 and XBB. Arch Virol 170, 82 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-025-06248-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-025-06248-y