Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 1, 2021
Date Accepted: May 17, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jun 1, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Confidence, and Public Engagement: A Global Social Listening Study

Hou Z, Tong Y, Du F, Lu L, Zhao S, Yu K, Piatek SJ, Larson H, Lin L

Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Confidence, and Public Engagement: A Global Social Listening Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27632

DOI: 10.2196/27632

PMID: 34061757

PMCID: 8202656

Assessing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, confidence and public engagement: a global social listening study

  • Zhiyuan Hou; 
  • Yixin Tong; 
  • Fanxing Du; 
  • Linyao Lu; 
  • Sihong Zhao; 
  • Kexin Yu; 
  • Simon J. Piatek; 
  • Heidi Larson; 
  • Leesa Lin

ABSTRACT

Background:

Monitoring public confidence and hesitancy is crucial for COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Social media listening can not only monitor public attitudes on COVID-19 vaccine in real-time, but also assess the dissemination and public engagement of these opinions.

Objective:

To assess global hesitancy, confidence and public engagement towards COVID-19 vaccination.

Methods:

We collected and manually coded 12886 social media posts mentioning COVID-19 vaccine from five global metropolises with high COVID-19 burden between June and July, 2020. After assessment, 7032 posts were included in analysis. We manually double-coded these posts using a coding framework developed according to the WHO’s Confidence, Complacency, and Convenience model of vaccine hesitancy, and conducted engagement analysis to investigate public communication about COVID-19 vaccine on social media.

Results:

Among social media users, 36.4% (571/1568) in New York, 51.3% (738/1440) in London, 67.3% (144/214) in Sao Paulo, 69.8% (726/1040) in Mumbai, and 76.8% (2128/2770) in Beijing indicated that they intended to accept COVID-19 vaccination. With high perceived risk of getting COVID-19, more tweeters in New York and London expressed lack of confidence in vaccine safety, distrust in governments and experts, and widespread misinformation and rumors. Tweeters from Mumbai, Sao Paulo and Beijing worried more about vaccine production and supply, whereas tweeters from New York and London had more concern on vaccine distribution and inequity. Negative tweets expressing lack of vaccine confidence and misinformation or rumors, had more followers and attracted more public engagement online.

Conclusions:

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is prevalent across the world, and negative tweets attract higher engagement on social media. It is urgent to develop an effective vaccine campaign that boosts public confidence and addresses hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccine rollout.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hou Z, Tong Y, Du F, Lu L, Zhao S, Yu K, Piatek SJ, Larson H, Lin L

Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Confidence, and Public Engagement: A Global Social Listening Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27632

DOI: 10.2196/27632

PMID: 34061757

PMCID: 8202656

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement