Skip to main content
Log in

Advancing COVID-19 poverty estimation with satellite imagery-based deep learning techniques: a systematic review

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s world, where the global population is expanding at an unprecedented rate, addressing the challenge of poverty has become more critical than ever before. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the issue of poverty has taken on renewed urgency as communities worldwide grapple with the socioeconomic fallout. Amidst the difficulties posed by the COVID-19 crisis, innovative approaches are required to address the evolving nature of poverty in the context of a pandemic-stricken world. This study systematically reviews the usage of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods for COVID-19 poverty estimation using satellite imagery, emphasizing the need for innovative approaches due to the growing global population and poverty levels. It assesses how ML and DL leverage diverse data sources, such as mobile phone records, satellite imagery, and household surveys, to identify poverty indicators and enhance analysis precision. This study identifies challenges, including data availability and model biases, and suggests future directions focusing on dynamic models and multidimensional COVID-19 poverty assessment. It highlights the implications for spatial information science, advocating for improved data integration and model transparency to support effective COVID-19 poverty alleviation policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations (The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021). 2021, Accessed: 2021-01-20, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/.

  2. Sumner, A., Ortiz-Juarez, E., & Hoy, C. (2022). Measuring global poverty before and during the pandemic: a political economy of overoptimism, Third World Quarterly, vol. 43, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1995712.

  3. Sah, S., Surendiran, B., Dhanalakshmi, R., & Yamin, M. (2023). Covid-19 cases prediction using SARIMAX Model by tuning hyperparameter through grid search cross‐validation approach, Expert Systems, 40, pp. 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13086.

  4. Blumenstock, J., Cadamuro, G., & On, R. (2015). Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata, Science, vol. 350, pp. 1073–1076, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4420.

  5. Dash, S., Chakravati, S., Mohanty, S. N., Patnaik, C. R., & Jain, S. (2021). A deep learning method to forecast Covid-19 outbreak. New Generation Computing, 39(2), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-021-00129-z. ISSN: 02883635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dasgupta, N. (2022). Using satellite images of nighttime lights to predict the economic impact of COVID-19 in India. Advances in Space Research, 70, 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Minetto, R., Segundo, M. P., Rotich, G., & Sarkar, S. (2021). Measuring Human and Economic Activity From Satellite Imagery to Support City-Scale Decision-Making During COVID-19 Pandemic, IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7, 1, 56–68, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2020.3032839.

  8. Instituto Nacional De Estadistica Poverty and its Measurement, Accessed: 2021-01-17.

  9. Eskelinen, T., Poverty, A., & Chatterjee, D. K. (Eds.). (2011). Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_178.

  10. Deonandan, R. (2019). Defining poverty: A Summary of competing models. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.02.01.44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greeley, M. (1994). Measurement of poverty and poverty of measurement. IDS Bulletin 25.

  12. Kakwani, N. (2003). Issues in Setting Absolute Poverty Lines, Asian Development Bank.

  13. Alsharkawi, A., Al-Fetyani, M., Dawas, M., Saadeh, H., & Alyaman, M. (2021). Poverty classification using machine learning: The case of Jordan. Sustainability, 13(2021), 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammed, R., Rawashdeh, J., & Abdullah, M. (2020). Machine Learning with Oversampling and Undersampling Techniques: Overview Study and Experimental Results, pp. 243–248, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICS49469.2020.239556.

  15. Kara, A., Nikolic, M., Olteanu, D., & Zhang, H. (2021). Machine learning over static and dynamic Relational Data. International Conference on Distributed and Event-based Systems, ACM, 160–163. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465480.3467843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffin, P., & The World Bank., New Political Economy 11 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460600991028.

  17. United States Census, U.S Census Bureau’s Budget Fiscal Year 2021, Accessed: 2021-01-20.

  18. Alkire, S., Roche, J., & Sumner, A. (2013). Where Do the World’s Multidimensionally Poor People Live? Working Papers 61, Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI).

  19. Indian Statistical Institute, The National Sample Survey. (1953). General Report 1. First Round: October 1950 - March 1951. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics (1933–1960), 13(1/2), 47–214. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25048165.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sadana, R., Mathers, C. D., Lopez, A. D., Murray, C. J. L., & Iburg, K. (2001). Comparative Analyses of More than 50 Household Surveys on Health Status, World Health Organization, GPE Discussion Paper Series 15.

  21. Lanjouw, J., & Lanjouw, P. (1997). Poverty Comparisons with Noncompatible Data: Theory and Illustrations, Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank.

  22. Lanjouw, P., & Ravallion, M. (1996). How Should We Assess Poverty Using Data from Different Surveys? World Bank Joint Publication 3.

  23. Lao Statistics Bureaua, & Bank, W. (2020). Poverty Profile in Lao PDR: Poverty Report for the Lao Expenditure and Consumption Survey 2018–2019.

  24. Nandy, S., Daoud, A., & Gordon, D. (2016). Examining the changing profile of undernutrition in the context of food price rises and greater inequality (Vol. 149, pp. 153–156). Social Science & Medicine.

  25. Daoud, A., Jordán, F., Sharma, M., Johansson, F., Dubhashi, D., Paul, S., & Banerjee, S. (2023). Using Satellite images and deep learning to measure Health and Living standards in India, Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-life measurement (Vol. 167, pp. 475–505). Springer. 1.

  26. Shankar, K., Mohanty, S. N., Yadav, K., & Gopalakrishnan, T. (2021). Automated COVID-19 diagnosis and classification using convolutional neural network with fusion-based feature extraction model. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 16, Issue 1, doi.org/10.1007/s11571-021-09712-y. ISSN: 1871-4099.

  27. Jerzak, C. T., & Johansson, F. (2023). A. Daoud. Integrating Earth Observation Data into Causal Inference: Challenges and opportunities. Cornell University.

  28. Jerzak, C. T., Johansson, F., & Daoud, A. (2023). Image-based Treatment Effect Heterogeneity, Cornell University.

  29. Jerzak, C. T., Johansson, F., & Daoud, A. (2023). Estimating Causal effects under Image Confounding Bias with an application to poverty in Africa. Cornell University.

  30. Balgi, S., Pena, J. M., & Daoud, A. (2022). Personalized Public Policy Analysis in Social Sciences using causal-graphical normalizing flows. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(11), 11810–11818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shome, D., Kar, T., Mohanty, S. N., Tiwari, P., Muhammad, K., AlTameem, A., Zhang, Y., Saudagar, & A. K. J. (2021). COVID-transformer: Interpretable COVID-19 detection using vision transformer for healthcare. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111086. ISSN: 1660-4601

  32. Daoud, A., & Johansson, F. (2019). Estimating Treatment Heterogeneity of International Monetary Fund Programs on Child Poverty with Generalized Random Forest, SocArXiv Papers.

  33. Wolff, E. N., & Distribution, W. (2015). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), Elsevier, pp. 450–455, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.71017-8.

  34. Alkire, S., Roche, J., & Sumner, A. (2013). Where Do the World’s Multidimensionally Poor People Live? Working Papers 61, Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative.

  35. Alkire, S., Santos, M. E., & Index, M. P. (2010). Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI).

  36. Seth, S., & Alkire, S. (2013). Measuring and Decomposing Inequality among the Multidimensionally Poor using Ordinal Variables: A Counting Approach, OPHI Working paper 68.

  37. Roh, Y., Heo, G., Whang, S. E., & Perspective (2021). IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 33(4), 1328–1347, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2019.2946162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jolliffe, D., & Prydz, E. B. (2016). Estimating international poverty lines from comparable national thresholds. J Econ Inequal, 14, 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-016-9327-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaminska, O., & Lynn, P. (2017). Cross-country comparisons where Countries Vary in Sample Design: Issues and solutions. Journal of Official Statistics, 33, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. World Bank, International Comparison Program (2021). Accessed: 2021-01-16, https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/icp#1.

  41. Dekker, R. (2006). The importance of having data-sets, 27th IATUL Conference.

  42. Elahi, A. (2008). Challenges of data collection in developing countries - the Pakistani experience as a way forward. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 25(1,2), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  43. World Bank, World Bank Open Data (2021). Accessed: 2021-01-16, https://data.worldbank.org/.

  44. Sah, S., Surendiran, B., Dhanalakshmi, R., Mohanty, S. N., Alenezi, F., & Polat, K. (2022). Forecasting COVID-19 pandemic using prophet, ARIMA, and hybrid stacked LSTM-GRU models in India. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, Article ID 1556025. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1556025. ISSN: 17486718, 1748670X

  45. Gao, C., Fei, C. J., McCarl, B. A., & Leatham, D. J. (2020). Identifying Vulnerable Households Using Machine Learning Sustainability 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156002.

  46. Talingdan, J. A. (2019). Performance Comparison of Different Classification Algorithms for Household Poverty Classification, 2019 4th International Conference on Information Systems Engineering (ICISE), pp. 11–15, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISE.2019.00010.

  47. Wu, X., Kumar, V., Quinlan, R., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., Mclachlan, G., Ng, S. K. A., Liu, B., Yu, P., Zhou, Z., Steinbach, M., Hand, D., & Steinberg, D. (2007). Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2.

  48. Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wright, R. E., Logistic regression, L. G., Grimm, & Yarnold, P. R. (Eds.). (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics, pp. 217–244.

  50. Breiman, L., & Forests, R. (2001). Machine Learning 45, pp. 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.

  51. Satapathy, S. K., Saravanan, S., Mishra, S., & Mohanty, S. N. (2023). A comparative analysis of multidimensional COVID-19 poverty determinants: An observational machine learning approach. New Generation Computing, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-023-00203-8. ISSN: 02883635

  52. Elvidge, C., Safran, J., Tuttle, B., Sutton, P., Cinzano, P., Pettit, D., Arvesen, J., & Small, C. (2007). Potential for global mapping of development via a nightsat mission. Geojournal, 69, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9104-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jean, N., Burke, M., Xie, M., Davis, W. M., & Lobell, D. B. S. Ermon, combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353(6301), pp. 790–794, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7894.

  54. Yeh, C., Perez, A., Driscoll, A., Azzari, G., Tang, Z., Lobell, D., Ermon, S., & Burke, M. (2020). Using publicly available satellite imagery and deep learning to understand economic well-being in Africa. Nature Communications, 11(2583). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16185-w.

  55. Babenko, B., Hersh, J., Newhouse, D., Ramakrishnan, A., & Swartz, T. (2017). Poverty Mapping Using Convolutional Neural Networks Trained on High and Medium Resolution Satellite Images, With an Application in Mexico, in: 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), arXiv:1711:06323v1.

  56. Raza Khan, M., & Blumensrandon mtock, J. E. (2019). Multi-GCN: Graph Convolutional Networks for Multi-View Networks, with Applications to Global Poverty, The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

  57. Pandey, S. M., Agarwal, T., & Krishnan, N. C. (2018). Multi-Task Deep Learning for Predicting Poverty from Satellite Images, The Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

  58. Asian Development Bank Mapping the spatial distribution of poverty using Satellite Imagery in Thailand, 2021, https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS210112-2.

  59. Agarwal, N., Mohanty, S.N., Sankhwar, S., et al. (2023). A novel model to predict the effects of enhanced students’ computer interaction on their health in COVID-19 pandemics. New Generation Computing, 41, 635–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-023-00224-3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachi Nandan Mohanty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S., Satapathy, S.K., Cho, SB. et al. Advancing COVID-19 poverty estimation with satellite imagery-based deep learning techniques: a systematic review. Spat. Inf. Res. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-024-00584-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-024-00584-y

Keywords

Navigation