Immune Netw. 2021 Dec;21(6):e38. English.
Published online Dec 23, 2021.
Copyright © 2021. The Korean Association of Immunologists
Review Article

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Mutation Is Faster than the Chase: Multiple Mutations on Spike/ACE2 Interaction Residues

Sinae Kim,1,2, Tam T. Nguyen,1,2, Afeisha S. Taitt,1 Hyunjhung Jhun,3 Ho-Young Park,4 Sung-Han Kim,5 view all
    • 1Laboratory of Cytokine Immunology, Department of Biomedical Science and Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
    • 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
    • 3Technical Assistance Center, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea.
    • 4Research Group of Functional Food Materials, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea.
    • 5Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
    • 6Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
    • 7Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University, Collage of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
    • 8Department of Medicine, Pusan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.
    • 9Pulmonary Science and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul 04551, Korea.
    • 10Center for Respiratory Disease, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu 42415, Korea.
    • 11Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang 25354, Korea.
    • 12Division of Vaccine Clinical Research Center for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Cheongju 28160, Korea.
    • 13Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6500HB, Netherlands.
Received December 14, 2021; Revised December 19, 2021; Accepted December 19, 2021.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Recently, a new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (B.1.1.529) Omicron variant originated from South Africa in the middle of November 2021. SARS-CoV-2 is also called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) since SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of COVID-19. Several studies already suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant would be the fastest transmissible variant compared to the previous 10 SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, interest, and alert. Few clinical studies reported the high transmissibility of the Omicron variant but there is insufficient time to perform actual experiments to prove it, since the spread is so fast. We analyzed the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, which revealed a very high rate of mutation at amino acid residues that interact with angiostatin-converting enzyme 2. The mutation rate of COVID-19 is faster than what we prepared vaccine program, antibody therapy, lockdown, and quarantine against COVID-19 so far. Thus, it is necessary to find better strategies to overcome the current crisis of COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords
COVID-19 Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; Spike (S) gene; Mutation; Receptor binding motif (RBM)

Currently, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant is the highest transmissible variant compared to the previous 10 SARS-CoV-2 variants. SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was the dominant transmissible variant before the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant had occurred (1, 2, 3, 4). The mutation sites of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variant were obtained from the United State of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html). Recent studies suggested that SARS-CoV-2 variants contributed to severe pathogenesis and death, particularly in unvaccinated people (5, 6). SARS-CoV receptor on the surface of the host cell was identified as an angiostatin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) about 19 years ago (7). In the absence of biochemical data, ACE2 was considered to be a receptor of SARS-CoV-2 since spike (S) gene of SARS-CoV shares 76% identity with that of SARS-CoV-2 (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15).

The S gene is composed of 1,273 amino acid residues that are divided into 16 subdomains by more structural information than functional property except for the receptor binding domain (RBD). The suggested amino acid residue of the RBD is varied by different studies (9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 18). Our previous study found that the critical amino acid residues in the receptor binding motif (RBM) of S gene were varied in 4 different reports (19). The analysis of ACE2 binding residue from 4 different studies revealed that only 6 amino acid residues (Y449, Y453, F486, N487, Q498, and T501) in RBM are common binding residues among 21 suggested interacting residues within 69 amino acid residues of RBM (19). These 6 amino acid residues elucidate only 28% of the 21 suggested interacting residues, which is an unexpected result because the protein complex structure has been generated by identical spike and ACE2 protein (9, 13, 14, 18).

In the present review, we compared the highest transmissible SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant to the previously dominant SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. Omicron has more than twice the number of mutation sites compared to that of Delta including severe mutations on spike/ACE2 interaction residues in RBM. These mutation sites are found in the ACE2 binding residues of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, which may contribute to the high transmissibility of Omicron.

New SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant was first detected from South Africa on the 16th of November 2021. It rose rapidly from 273 patients on the 16th of November to more than 1,200 patients by the 25th of November. More than 80% of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron cases were in the Northern province of Gauteng, where the first cases were seen (20). Currently SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is the dominant variant however researchers speculate that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant will take over the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant since the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant 1.8–7.0 folds higher than the variant of concern such as SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta (21).

The whole amino acid sequence of S gene from the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was aligned with that of the SARS-CoV-2 wild type (WT) in Fig. 1A. The result showed that 39 mutations were highlighted by different colors with bold letters. The mutation residues are also indicated by the absence of an asterisk at the bottom of the alignment. Several announcements said that SARS-CoV-2 Omicron has 34 mutations, but it has 39 mutations in S gene (Table 1). This discrepancy has happened since serial mutations such as double or triple amino acid residues were indicated as a single mutation, for example, del69-70, del142-144, and ins214EPE.

Figure 1
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 WT to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron S protein. (A) The whole S protein sequence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron was compared to that of SARS-CoV-2 WT. The mutated residue was highlighted by different colors such as yellow for amino acid change, blue for deletion, and green for insertion. RBD was highlighted by light pink and RBM was highlighted by light green. The signal sequence and transmembrane are in bold letters and underlined, it is also highlighted in gray. The absence of an asterisk at the bottom of alignment indicates a mutation site. (B) The RBD and RBM region was enlarged for further analysis. There are 15 mutations in RBD and 10 mutations in RBM of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, whereas only 2 mutations (red bold letter) in RBM of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. (C) The alignment of Omicron and Delta S protein was compared to the ACE2 receptor interaction sites, which were reported by WT1 (13), WT2 (14), WT3 (18), and WT4 (9). The 21 receptor binding residues were indicated by the green highlight. The 6 common ACE2 interaction sites were marked by an asterisk on the top to indicate the location (9, 13, 14, 18). The mutation residues in the RBM of Omicron and Delta were indicated by a red letter. The 7 receptor binding residues of Omicron in RBM were highlighted by blue color.

Table 1
S mutation residue of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants

The del69-70 is 2 residues of H69del and V70del deletion. The del142-144 is 3 residues of G142del, V143del, and Y144del deletion. The ins214EPE is 3 residues of ins214E, ins215P, and ins216E insertion (Table 1). These 3 occasions add 5 additional mutations resulting in those 34 mutations becoming 39 mutations. Unique mutation sites of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant’s residues were indicated by red bold letters. SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant has only 3 new mutation residues among 15 mutations whereas SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has 27 new mutation residues among 39 mutations in Table 1. In addition, the mutation residues of RBD and RBM were highlighted by orange and green color, respectively (Table 1). These massive new mutations probably contribute to the high infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

In Fig. 1A, the 39 mutation residues were highlighted by yellow for amino acid change, blue for amino acid deletion, and green for amino acid insertion. Interestingly, the deletions and insertions have occurred in the N-terminus of RBD. The insertion of ins214E, ins215P, and ins216E happened for the first time among the 11 SARS-CoV-2 variants. The RBD and RBM were highlighted by a light pink and a light green color, respectively (Fig. 1A). The signal peptide and transmembrane domain were indicated by bold underlined letters with gray highlight. The subunit 1 (S1) and subunit 2 (S2) cleavage sites were marked by green highlight with red bold letters that were indicated by a dark blue arrow (Fig. 1A, the left down). Interestingly, 2 mutations, N679K and P681H, present just in the N-terminus of the cleavage site. These adjacent mutation sites could influence the cleavage of S1 and S2 resulted in the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant into the host cells (22, 23, 24, 25).

The RBD and RBM highlighted regions were enlarged for more detailed analysis (Fig. 1B). The 15 mutation sites with yellow highlight are present in the RBD of S gene, which is 38% of the total 39 mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Surprisingly, the 10 mutations present in critical RBM within 69 amino acid residues resulted in that 14% of the amino acid residue being changed in RBM. However, only 2 mutations were present in the RBM of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant that was indicated by a red bold letter. The mutation sites in the RBM of Omicron is 5 folds higher than that of Delta variant (Fig. 1B). In addition to this, the 69 amino acid residues of RBM are only 0.05% of the whole S gene containing 1,273 amino acid residues. The frequency of mutation in RBM of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron is about 760 folds higher than that of the whole S gene. The high frequency of mutation in the critical RBM may enhance the transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, which has about 8.4 folds higher transmissibility than the known SARS-CoV-2 D614G original strain (21).

The direct binding residue in the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, Delta, and previous studies (9, 13, 14, 18) was analyzed by protein sequence alignment (Fig. 1C). The specific binding residues were highlighted by green in RBM and the upper 4 lines WT1–WT4 from these different reports (9, 13, 14, 18). These 21 residues directly interact with ACE2 on the surface of host cells. Interestingly, each study suggested binding residue was different and this result is unanticipated since the protein complex structure was obtained from an identical spike and ACE2 proteins (9, 13, 14, 18). The analysis of ACE2 binding residue found only 6 binding residues (Y449, Y453, F486, N487, Q498, and T501) were common binding residue among 21 suggested binding residues indicated by an asterisk on the top (Fig. 1C). Astonishingly, the 7 mutations (blue highlight; G446S, E484A, Q493R, G496S, Q498R, N501Y, and Y505H) in the RBM of Omicron have corresponded to the ACE2 binding sites whereas the 2 mutations (red letter; L452R and T478K) in the RBM of Delta did not correspond to any of ACE2 binding sites. The Q498R mutation is one of the 6 common binding sites (Y449, Y453, F486, N487, Q498, and T501) from 4 different reports (9, 13, 14, 18). This critical residue Q498R with severe mutations on spike/ACE2 interaction residues in RBM may contribute to the high transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

The 39 mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant were illustrated by geographical location in S gene that was divided into 16 subdomains by different colors (Fig. 2). The specific amino acid residue of each domain was shown on the right such as RBD 319–545 and RBM 483–507. The 15 mutations present in the crucial RBD (yellow bar; 319–545), which was shown by red letters with a yellow highlight. Furthermore, the 10 mutations present in the critical RBM (green bar; 438–507), which was shown by red letters with a green highlight (Fig. 2). Interestingly, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has an insertion site (red letters) in the N-terminal domain (NTD; 18–305) that was found for the first time among the 11 SARS-CoV-2 variants. The 6 deletion sites also present in NTD resulted in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant containing 1,270 amino acid residues which is 3 residues less than SARS-CoV-2 WT (Fig. 2, right on the top).

Figure 2
Geographical drawing of mutation sites in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron S gene. The S protein contains 16 subdomains that were shown by different colors with specific residues on the right. The S1 (R685) cleavage site was indicated at the top with a red arrow. The 15 mutations in RBD were indicated in red letters with a yellow highlight. The 10 mutations in RBM were indicated in red letters with a green highlight. Each amino acid change was illustrated at the bottom of the domain bar by geographical drawing. The 3 unique insertion sites were indicated by red letters in NTD.
SP, signal peptide; L, loop; SD, subdomain; FP, fusion peptide; CR, connected region; HR, heptad repeat; CH, central helix; BH, β-hairpin; TM, transmembrane domain; CT, cytosolic domain.

Currently, there is a large concern about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) because the highly transmissible COVID-19 Omicron variant has been reported from different countries. In this review, we analyzed the mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant to understand the current crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to explain the high transmissibility of Omicron. The analysis of Omicron mutation sites revealed the crucial ACE2 binding residues in the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron was heavily mutated. Probably the mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 is much faster than any other infectious respiratory virus. Therefore, the conventional lockdown, quarantine, vaccine program, and antibody therapy are not sufficient to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. We must find alternative approach to overcome the crisis of COVID-19 pandemic.

Notes

Conflict of Interest:The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Kim S1, Kim S2, Nguyen TT, Jhun H, Park HY, Kim SH, Kim YG, Song EY, Lee Y, Yum H, Shin KC, Song CS, Yeom SC, Kim B, Choi YK, Netea M.

  • Funding acquisition: Kim S1, Jhun H.

  • Project administration: Kim S.1

  • Supervision: Kim S.1

  • Validation: Kim S2, Nguyen TT.

  • Writing - original draft: Kim S.1

  • Writing - review & editing: Kim S1, Kim S2, Nguyen TT, Taitt AS.

Kim S1, Soohyun Kim; Kim S2, Sinae Kim.

ACE2 angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
COVID-19 coronavirus disease 2019
NTD N-terminal domain
RBD receptor binding domain
RBM receptor binding motif
SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
S spike
S subunit
WT wild type

This paper was written as part of Konkuk University's research support program for its faculty on sabbatical leave in 2022. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1F1A1057397). This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E0210503-01) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT.

    1. Brown CM, Vostok J, Johnson H, Burns M, Gharpure R, Sami S, Sabo RT, Hall N, Foreman A, Schubert PL, et al. Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infections, including COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections, associated with large public gatherings - Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1059–1062.
    1. Dagpunar J. Interim estimates of increased transmissibility, growth rate, and reproduction number of the COVID-19 B.1.617.2 variant of concern in the United Kingdom. MedRxiv. 2021 [doi: 10.1101/2021.06.03.21258293]
    1. Liu Y, Rocklöv J. The reproductive number of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 is far higher compared to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Travel Med 2021;28:taab124
    1. Shi Q, Dong XP. Rapid global spread of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant: spatiotemporal variation and public health impact. Zoonoses 2021;1:1–6.
    1. Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, Gallagher E, Simmons R, Thelwall S, Stowe J, Tessier E, Groves N, Dabrera G, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. N Engl J Med 2021;385:585–594.
    1. Sheikh A, McMenamin J, Taylor B, Robertson C. Public Health Scotland and the EAVE II Collaborators. SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet 2021;397:2461–2462.
    1. Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 2003;426:450–454.
    1. Chen Y, Guo Y, Pan Y, Zhao ZJ. Structure analysis of the receptor binding of 2019-nCoV. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020;525:135–140.
    1. Lan J, Ge J, Yu J, Shan S, Zhou H, Fan S, Zhang Q, Shi X, Wang Q, Zhang L, et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 2020;581:215–220.
    1. Shang J, Ye G, Shi K, Wan Y, Luo C, Aihara H, Geng Q, Auerbach A, Li F. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020;581:221–224.
    1. Song W, Gui M, Wang X, Xiang Y. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2. PLoS Pathog 2018;14:e1007236
    1. Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, Abiona O, Graham BS, McLellan JS. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 2020;367:1260–1263.
    1. Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020;367:1444–1448.
    1. Yuan M, Wu NC, Zhu X, Lee CD, So RT, Lv H, Mok CK, Wilson IA. A highly conserved cryptic epitope in the receptor binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Science 2020;368:630–633.
    1. Yuan Y, Cao D, Zhang Y, Ma J, Qi J, Wang Q, Lu G, Wu Y, Yan J, Shi Y, et al. Cryo-EM structures of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV spike glycoproteins reveal the dynamic receptor binding domains. Nat Commun 2017;8:15092.
    1. Kim S, Lee JH, Lee S, Shim S, Nguyen TT, Hwang J, Kim H, Choi YO, Hong J, Bae S, et al. The progression of SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2): mutation in the receptor binding domain of spike gene. Immune Netw 2020;20:e41
    1. Li F, Li W, Farzan M, Harrison SC. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science 2005;309:1864–1868.
    1. Wang Q, Zhang Y, Wu L, Niu S, Song C, Zhang Z, Lu G, Qiao C, Hu Y, Yuen KY, et al. Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2. Cell 2020;181:894–904.e9.
    1. Jhun H, Park HY, Hisham Y, Song CS, Kim S. SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) variant: a unique T478K mutation in receptor binding motif (RBM) of spike gene. Immune Netw 2021;21:e32
    1. Torjesen I. Covid-19: Omicron may be more transmissible than other variants and partly resistant to existing vaccines, scientists fear. BMJ 2021;375:n2943.
    1. Zhang L, Li Q, Liang Z, Li T, Liu S, Cui Q, Nie J, Wu Q, Qu X, Huang W, et al. The significant immune escape of pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron. Emerg Microbes Infect 2021;10:1–11.
    1. Barrett CT, Neal HE, Edmonds K, Moncman CL, Thompson R, Branttie JM, Boggs KB, Wu CY, Leung DW, Dutch RE. Effect of clinical isolate or cleavage site mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on protein stability, cleavage, and cell-cell fusion. J Biol Chem 2021;297:100902
    1. Belouzard S, Chu VC, Whittaker GR. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:5871–5876.
    1. Simmons G, Gosalia DN, Rennekamp AJ, Reeves JD, Diamond SL, Bates P. Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:11876–11881.
    1. Simmons G, Zmora P, Gierer S, Heurich A, Pöhlmann S. Proteolytic activation of the SARS-coronavirus spike protein: cutting enzymes at the cutting edge of antiviral research. Antiviral Res 2013;100:605–614.

Publication Types
Review
Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 2

Tables

1 / 1

PERMALINK