ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Opinion Article

SARS-CoV-2 and hypokalaemia: evidence and implications

[version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 10 Jun 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Coronavirus collection.

Abstract

The global pandemic secondary to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is leading to unprecedented global morbidity and mortality. With a bewildering array of complications, renal involvement in various forms is common, including serum electrolyte derangements. Hypokalaemia secondary to SARS-CoV-2 was common in a reported Chinese cohort. Here we review the emerging evidence on hypokalaemia and SARS-CoV-2 infection, the potential pathophysiological mechanisms based on early clinical and histopathological data and important clinical implications. Mechanisms of hypokalaemia are multifactorial and so the electrolyte disturbance can be difficult to avoid. We provide further support to the theory of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAS) activation, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of implicating RAS involvement and highlight the importance of calculating the transtubular potassium gradient to identify those at risk of hypokalaemia and its complications.

Keywords

Hypokalaemia, SARS-CoV-2, ACE-2, transtubular potassium gradient, alkalosis

Introduction

The global pandemic secondary to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is leading to unprecedented global morbidity and mortality. Anecdotal data and clinical observation from patients with the World Health Organization named disease coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has highlighted a bewildering array of presentations and pathologies. These include respiratory complications (acute hypoxic respiratory failure, severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis)1, cardiovascular complications (myocardial injury, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, cardiac tamponade, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, dysrhythmias and venous thromboembolic events)2, neurological complications (anosmia, myopathy, acute stroke, Guillain-Barre syndrome and encephalopathy)3, acute liver and/or pancreatic injury4, cytokine storm syndrome, septic shock, DIC, diarrhoea, Kawasaki-like disease5and renal complications (acute tubular injury, rhabdomyolysis, proteinuria, secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and possible renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation)6.

SARS-CoV-2 may affect the kidneys directly and indirectly by both renal and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) involvement. What is uncertain are the exact pathophysiological mechanisms that play a role in this. Early reports have suggested that hypokalaemia may be seen frequently in patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Here we aim to review the evidence and the potential clinical implications of this well recognised but potentially serious electrolyte disturbance in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and touch on renal features of the infection discovered so far.

Firstly, it is important to highlight how transmission of the virus occurs in humans. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein enters host cells via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on the surface of pulmonary type 2 alveolar cells7,8. ACE2 is crucial to counter-regulate RAS and shares approximately 60% homology with ACE. RAS pathway components are co-expressed in most organs and tissues in the body and communicate via both paracrine and autocrine signalling. ACE2 converts angiotensin-II into angiotensin-(1-7), which acts on the Mas receptor expressed on a variety of tissue cell lineages relevant to cardiovascular disease in addition to type 2 alveolar epithelial cells. It lowers blood pressure through vasodilation and promotion of renal sodium and water excretion and it also attenuates inflammation by producing nitric oxide. Meanwhile, ACE converts angiotensin-I to angiotensin-II which has directly opposing effects to signalling mediated by ACE2. Angiotensin-II acts at the type 1 angiotensin receptor (AT1R) to increase blood pressure by the induction of vasoconstriction and renal sodium and water reabsorption. This also creates oxidative stress which promotes inflammation and fibrosis. The balance between these two opposing pathways determines potential tissue injury, predominantly in the heart and kidneys7,8. Not only has the ACE2 receptor found to be used for host cell entry by the SARS-CoV virus, but the affinity for SARS-CoV-2 is 10-20-fold higher9. During host cell entry, proteolytic cleavage of ACE2 by transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) occurs which is thought to suppress ACE2 expression. This in theory would lead to a reduction in angiotensin-(1-7) generation and angiotensin-II levels would increase resulting in oxidative-stress mediated tissue damage and hypertension7,8. This mechanism resulting in lung parenchymal injury has already been demonstrated in mice injected with SARS-CoV-2 virus10.

Involvement of the RAS pathway has therefore been speculated as a mechanism to lead to more severe COVID-19 disease and patients with severe disease were more likely to have hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease than those with milder disease. This is, however not confirmed and is preliminary data that may be the subject of bias with disregard of age as a potential confounding factor8.

Hypokalaemia is known to cause muscle weakness, paraesthesia, thirst, muscle cramps and weakness, but hypokalaemia is an important complication of any disease due to it being a potentially life-threatening condition11. In fact, the incidence of ventricular fibrillation has been shown to be fivefold higher in patients with hypokalaemia compared to those with hyperkalaemia12. Furthermore, inadequate management of hypokalaemia has been identified in 24% of hospitalised patients13, reiterating that we need to be even more vigilant with the management of this life-threatening condition during a pandemic where resources are even more scarce.

What is the evidence for hypokalaemia in SARS-CoV-2 infection so far?

The release of a pre-print retrospective Chinese study initially sparked interest into hypokalaemia as a potentially prevalent biochemical disturbance in SARS-CoV-2 infection14. This was released around a similar time to concerns around RAS inhibitors and SARS-CoV-2 where speculation that RAS inhibitors may increase risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity due to the knowledge that ACE2 is the viral binding site for host cell entry. It has been stressed by multiple organisations globally that RAS inhibitors should be continued unless otherwise medially indicated as the risks of stopping these important drugs have numerous serious complications to the patient. This study claimed that hypokalaemia was prevalent amongst SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, affecting 108 of 175 patients (62%) that had a serum potassium of <3.5 mmol/l and only 10 patients had a serum K >4.0 mmol/l which is the value required for those with myocardial dysfunction. Of the patients, 22% had severe hypokalaemia (serum potassium <3.0 mmol/l). In total, 11% of all patients and 28% of those with severe hypokalaemia displayed metabolic alkalosis (pH >7.45) compared to 4% with normokalaemia suggesting the possibility of RAS activation. The study suggested that the hypokalaemia was not due to gastrointestinal (GI) loss of potassium as only a small proportion of patients had GI symptoms, there was no significant difference between serum potassium in those with or without diarrhoea and significant urinary potassium wasting was shown. A total of 20 patients had a spot urine potassium/creatinine ratio and there were significantly higher urinary potassium/creatinine ratios in those with hypokalaemia compared with normokalaemia. The study reported that the degree of hypokalaemia correlated with severity of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and they suggested that hypokalaemia can be difficult to correct as seen in two patients because the renal potassium wasting persists until clinical recovery from the virus. This study is relatively small, limited to a Chinese population and did not disclose medications or diuretic use which could be a significant confounding factor here. As diuretics (especially “loop” diuretics) are used to improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS, some of these patients may well have been prescribed them. It was postulated that hypokalaemia in these patients is due to the effects of increased angiotensin-2 resulting from the proteolytic cleavage of ACE2 from virion invasion of the host although this conclusion cannot be made without measuring components of the RAS system in these patients. Further studies including declaration of medications/diuretic use and measurement of components of the RAS pathway are necessary to make conclusions about aetiology of hypokalaemia in SARS-CoV-2 infection although hypokalaemia was clearly a clinical risk in these patients that should be communicated to the medical community.

A study performed in Hong Kong during the 2003 SARS-CoV epidemic compared symptoms and laboratory findings in SARS-CoV RT-PCR swab-positive patients to negative patients15. Hypokalaemia was present in 41.3% of RT-PCR positive patients and was reported as a ‘common laboratory finding’. It was also suggested in this paper that the hypokalaemia was due to the increased effects of angiotensin-2 but, again, the RAS components were not measured in patients. In contrast, the largest SARS-CoV-2 case series so far (1099 patients included) did not demonstrate any major difference in serum potassium between those with mild and those with severe disease16. Serum potassium was mostly reported as normal in this cohort. SARS-CoV was found in the urine in one patient but urine was not routinely tested for the virus in this cohort.

Not all patients with hyperaldosteronism develop hypokalaemia

The theory of RAS activation causing hypokalaemia is popular, however it is recognised that hyperaldosteronism does not always cause hypokalaemia. This is explained by the ‘renal potassium switch’ mechanism (Figure 1), which involves the paradoxical actions of aldosterone on potassium; for example, aldosterone increases sodium reabsorption in states of low circulating volume without significantly altering potassium balance, but it also increases serum potassium excretion in high potassium states without affecting sodium balance. This paradoxical action all depends on the sodium delivery to the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron (collecting duct) which is generated by the sodium-chloride co-symporter (NCC) in the early distal convoluted tubule. Activation of this ‘switch’ is by phosphorylation of NCC by the WNK/SPAK/OSR1 pathway17,18 and is done by aldosterone in response to low or high serum potassium i.e. NCC is maximally phosphorylated when serum potassium is <2.5 mmol/l and not at all phosphorylated when serum potassium is >5.2 mmol/l19. In states of decreased circulating volume, ENaC activity is increased due to the effects of excess aldosterone (which generates a sufficient intracellular electrochemical gradient to cause active transport of potassium from blood via Na+K+-ATPase which would be passively excreted into the tubular lumen by ROMK and BK channels in the Principal cell). Whether this generates an effect on potassium or not depends on the integrated activity of the entire distal nephron. In a state of low circulating volume, NCC in the early DCT is ‘switched on’ which results in increased reabsorption of sodium and chloride in the early DCT and, along with sodium reabsorption in the PCT, a net increase of sodium reabsorption from the kidney occurs. As a result, sodium delivery to the aldosterone sensitive distal nephron (collecting duct) is decreased which offsets the effects of ENaC and potassium excretion is therefore unchanged. This results in a state of hyperaldosteronism without hypokalaemia.

b6da55e6-4f61-484b-92d1-0835746dfb6d_figure1.gif

Figure 1. NCC Phosphorylation downstream and changes in urinary potassium (renal potassium switch).

In states of hyperaldosteronism and volume depletion the renal potassium switch is ‘active’. Angiotensin-II (ang-II) stimulates Kir4.1/5.1 to hyperpolarise the basolateral membrane potential and lowers intracellular chloride. This action activates WNK1 (With-no-lysine-kinase-1) and WNK4 (With-no-lysine-kinase-4) by phosphorylation which subsequently phosphorylates SPS1-related proline / alanine-rich kinase (SPAK) and oxidative stress-responsive kinase (OSR1) which, again, phosphorylates the sodium chloride co-symporter (NCC). NCC then avidly reabsorbs sodium (and chloride) back into the body in the early part of the distal convoluted tubule (DCT1). This results in reduced tubular sodium delivery to the collecting duct. Subsequently there is less sodium for the Epithelial sodium Channel (ENaC) to reabsorb and its action is offset. ENaC usually reabsorbs sodium and, via an electrochemical gradient made by sodium-potassium-ATPase, potassium is normally excreted into the tubular lumen by ROMK (Renal Outer Medulla Potassium channel) and BK (Big Potassium/Maxi-K channel) and eliminated from the body. When ENaC is less active, as a consequence of less tubular sodium delivery, less potassium is excreted. This results in a state of hyperaldosteronism with a normal serum potassium. In states of hyperaldosteronism and normal cardiovascular volume (in response to high serum potassium) the switch is ‘inactive’. NCC is not phosphorylated which results in more distal sodium delivery to the collecting duct and subsequent ENaC activation resulting in excretion of potassium into the tubular lumen and a state of hypokalaemia17,18. Arrows represent the direction of movement of electrolytes. Red arrows reflect a reduction in movement and green arrows represent an increase in movement. CLC-Kb, chloride voltage-gated channel Kb; Kir4.1/5.1, inwardly rectifying potassium channel 4.1; AT1R, type 1 angiotensin receptor.

Histopathological evidence of tubulopathy

There are two studies so far (one in pre-print form) to look at renal histopathology on post-mortem findings in SARS-CoV-2 patients who died of the disease (9 of the 26 had pre-morbid clinical kidney injury signs)20,21. The first demonstrated prominent proximal tubule injury (observed in all 26 patients) with frank necrosis observed in some specimens and three patients had high creatinine phosphokinase and pigmented casts on light microscopy, probably representing rhabdomyolysis. There was occasional distal tubule and collecting duct swelling with some interstitial oedema and virus particles were seen in seven of the specimens on electron microscopy in proximal tubule epithelial cells and the podocyte, both of which are the only sites of renal ACE2 expression20. The second post-mortem case series in (currently in pre-print) examined six post-mortem renal histopathology samples of patients who died with SARS-CoV-2 infection21. All specimens had histopathological evidence of acute tubular necrosis, two patients had severe lymphocytic infiltration of the tubulointerstitium and SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigens were observed in renal tubule cells. Transmission electron microscopy was used in samples from two different patients, both of which demonstrated the presence of virions and virus-like particles in renal cells and these cells were markedly swollen with mitochondrial, lysosomal and endoplasmic reticulum expansion. These finding suggest that SARS-CoV-2 directly infects kidneys and specifically infects and damages kidney tubules. Furthermore, strong CD68+ macrophage presence and C5b-9 deposition seen in the tubulointerstitium of all samples (yet absent in the rest of the kidney tissue and very little in the glomeruli and capillaries in two patients) suggest that further tubular damage occurs as a consequence of macrophage recruitment and C5b-9 activation and deposition. It would be logical to suggest that histopathological evidence of damage to tubular cells would result, clinically, as a tubulopathy, of which we know hypokalaemia is a recognised complication and these case series are histopathological evidence to support this suggestion.

Finally, we know that TMPRSS2 primes SARS-CoV-2 to gain cellular entry and TMPRSS2 is only detectable (in low levels) at the S3 section of the proximal convoluted tubule in the kidney22. It is therefore assumed that this is one way in which the kidney is ‘infected’ by the virus and reiterates the probability of direct virus-induced tubular damage. Various case series have demonstrated the virus in urine23,24 and it is unclear as to how it enters the tubular lumen and whether this is via the apical membrane of tubule cells. However, one study did look at the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in bodily fluids over time and did not detect the virus in urine in any of the nine patients studied25. A couple of case reports have demonstrated that the virus may affect the kidney in other ways which may be an alternative explanation for the entry of virus into the urine26,27. Collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has been described twice in the literature so far in patients of African or African American origin and both of these patients demonstrated severe tubular injury. It was noted that severe acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was observed in the absence of haemodynamic compromise and severe pulmonary involvement suggesting that the tubulopathy was not ischaemic and more likely to be because of either direct viral toxicity or cytokine-mediated damage.

Discussion

The data from China and evidence from the SARS-CoV case series provide good clinical justification to monitor potassium levels in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. We do need to see this clinical finding replicated in multi-centres to be able to make definitive conclusions about this clinical sequela. Although hyperkalaemia can occur for many reasons in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the incidence of ventricular fibrillation has been shown to be five-fold higher in patients with hypokalaemia compared to those with hyperkalaemia12.

Based on evidence of significant urine potassium wasting which can be prolonged, we suggest checking the transtubular potassium gradient (TTKG) in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This would help identify those at risk of severe or prolonged hypokalaemia and prompt pre-emptive cautious electrolyte monitoring and replacement which should help reduce the risk of hypokalaemic complications which can be fatal. The TTKG is easily measured and only requires measurements of serum and urine osmolality and potassium (urine potassium/serum potassium)/(urine osmolality/ serum osmolality). The estimation is relatively accurate providing the urine is not dilute and that urine sodium concentration is >25 mmol/l so that distal sodium delivery is not limiting28.

Measuring components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway would help us to identify the involvement of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; however, measuring these components in the acute setting has its limitations. The RAS system is heavily influenced by a multitude of factors. Many of the patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are critically unwell and often present to hospital in states of low cardiovascular volume. It has been recommended that patients with ARDS also be kept in a relative state of volume depletion as to not worsen pulmonary interstitial oedema and thus oxygenation. Both of these factors would typically result in RAS activation and could be very misleading when determining virus-related RAS pathway involvement. Some studies have shown that low urine pH (causing acidic urine) can be a predictor of RAS activation29 so future studies determining RAS system involvement of SARS-CoV-2 infection should, as well as TTKG, also consider urine pH as an early marker of RAS system activation.

Potassium levels <3.0 mmol/l can be arrhythmogenic and specifically can cause QTc interval prolongation, torsade de pointes, ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death30. This is particularly relevant for a couple of reasons. First, many of the drugs currently undergoing clinical trials in SARS-CoV-2 patients prolong the QTc interval (hydroxychloroquine31, azithromycin31, favipiravir, lopinavir/ritonavir and fingolimod: NCT04280588) and some drugs also risk hypokalaemia which may worsen pre-existing electrolyte disturbance (e.g. methylprednisolone: NCT04273321, NCT04263402; thalidomide: NCT04273529, NCT04273581; and bevacizumab: NCT04275414). Second, cardiac involvement in SARS-CoV-2 is high (44.4% of infected patients admitted to ICU experienced an arrhythmia). Induction of arrhythmias can be due to multi-factorial aetiologies of cardiac injury in SARS-CoV-2 patients such as hypoxia-mediated, direct tissue damage, cytokine-storm syndrome, worsening coronary perfusion and the direct effects of medications32. Both of these factors really emphasise the importance of maintaining normokalaemia in these patients to reduce morbidity and mortality.

In addition to the arrhythmogenic effects of both the SARS-CoV-2 cardiac sequelae and various clinical trial drugs, many patients are being given diuretics to improve the oxygenation in ARDS, which also risks hypokalaemic complications. If diuretics are to be used, it would be wise to consider potassium-sparing agents in hypokalaemic patients to reduce the cardiac complications of worsening hypokalaemia that can occur with those that are not potassium sparing.

It would be logical that with clear histopathological data suggesting tubular injury, hypokalaemia is to be expected in patients infected with SARS-CoV-233. Tubular injury seems to be multifactorial in these patients; ATN from SIRS/Cytokine Storm Syndrome, peritubular congestion, virion invasion, drug toxicity and pigment-cast nephropathy from rhabdomyolysis and therefore difficult to avoid.

The data on outcomes in cardiac arrest for SARS-CoV-2 patients is unfortunately poor. Chinese data suggests that in a series of 136 patients who underwent resuscitation efforts, return of spontaneous circulation was only achieved in 18 (13.2%) and only four patients were alive at 30 days34. The strong association of hypokalaemia with arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death reiterates the importance of vigilance for detection and treatment of this electrolyte disturbance during and after admission given such poor outcomes when spontaneous circulation is lost.

To truly know the extent of involvement of the RAS pathway as a potential cause of hypokalaemia in SARS-CoV-2 patients, further studies require measurement of all components of the RAS pathway. Until we know this, we cannot make definite conclusions about the mechanisms of hypokalaemia in these patients outside of the histopathological evidence of tubulopathy published, of which multiple aetiological factors are likely.

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jun 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Mabillard H and Sayer JA. SARS-CoV-2 and hypokalaemia: evidence and implications [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:587 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24441.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 10 Jun 2020
Views
28
Cite
Reviewer Report 26 Jun 2020
Paul Welling, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 
Not Approved
VIEWS 28
As pointed out by this review, the evidence for hypokalemia in COVID-19 is weak, promulgated by a single unpublished article that was not corroborated by larger series studies. My chief concern about the review, is that it amplifies the myth. ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Welling P. Reviewer Report For: SARS-CoV-2 and hypokalaemia: evidence and implications [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:587 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.26961.r64575)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jun 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.