Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How remote learning impacted elementary students’ online self-regulation for learning: A COVID-19 natural experiment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant switch to remote learning enabled a natural experiment to observe and compare the self-regulation strategies used by elementary students in hypermedia environments. Specifically, the same participants (N = 48, Mage = 10.75) were observed in two learning contexts: a traditional classroom with their teacher present, and remote learning from home where all learning was conducted and completed digitally. In both contexts, students completed self-report instruments about their perceived self-regulatory behavior and were individually observed completing a research task in a digital context. Observational data was coded using an established framework of self-regulation for learning (SRL) behaviors in computer-based learning environments. Results showed that the context of the learning did not impact the SRL strategies of elementary students, with no significant differences between the self-reporting or observational data in all categories, or in task performance. The level of consistency between the patterns of SRL behavior, self-reporting and task performance in both environmental contexts was a remarkable finding of this study. Surprisingly, despite remote learning demanding higher self-regulatory capacity, results show that elementary students did not automatically acquire or develop self-regulation skills, nor adjust their existing patterns of SRL behavior in this new learning context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2022). NAPLAN National Report for 2022. Retrieved 31st October, 2022 from https://nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2022-naplan-national-report.pdf

  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Moos, D., Witherspoon, A., & Chauncey, A. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes used during hypermedia learning: Issues and chal- lenges. Educational Psychologist, 45, 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Behnagh, R., Duffy, M., Harley, J., & Trevors, G. (2013). Metacognition and self-regulated learning in student-centered learning environments. In S. Land & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 181–207). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacher-Hicks, A., & Goodman, J. (2021). The Covid-19 pandemic is a lousy natural experiment for studying the effects of online learning: Focus, instead, on measuring the overall effects of the pandemic itself. Education Next, 21(4), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, K., Apps, T., Bennett, S., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G., & Lockyer, L. (2021). Self-regulation in open-ended online assignment tasks: The importance of initial task interpretation and goal setting. Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 46(4), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1654450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (1999). Self-regulation with respect to informal learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., Te Riele, K., Shelley, B. & Woodroffe, J. (2020). Learning at home during COVID-19: Effects on vulnerable young Australians. Independent Rapid Response Report. Hobart: University of Tasmania, Peter Underwood Centre for Educational Attainment. Retrieved July 21, 2021, from https://www.dese.gov.au/covid-19/resources/professor-natalie-brown-peter-underwood-centre

  • Cho, M., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school‐based program to enhance self‐regulated and self‐motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Assessing self-regulation as a cyclical, context-specific phenomenon: Overview and analysis of SRL microanalytic protocols. Education Research International, 2012, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/428639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, J. (2020). Supporting vulnerable children in the Face of a pandemic: A paper prepared for the Australian Government Department of Education, skills and Employment. Centre for program evaluation. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne.

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  • Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, P., Katikireddi, S. V., Leyland, A., & Popham, F. (2017). Natural experiments: An overview of methods, approaches, and contributions to public health intervention research. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., Büttner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students acquire self-regulated learning most efficiently? A meta-analysis on interventions that aim at fostering self-regulation. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., van Ewijk, R., Perels, F., & Fabriz, S. (2023). Let learners monitor the learning content and their learning behavior! A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of tools to foster monitoring. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donker, A., De Boer, H., Kostons, D., van Dignath, C., & Van Der Werf, M. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, R., & Patrinos, H. A. (2021). Learning loss during COVID-19: An early systematic review (pp. 1–9). Prospects.

  • Duzgun, S., & Basaran, M. (2021). The effect of self-regulated learning on success during distance education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(5), 1577–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica (2021). Retrieved from https://school.eb.com.au

  • Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Education Evidence Advisory Panel. (2022). Prioritizing learning during COVID-19: The most effective ways to keep children learning during and postpandemic. [K. Akyeampong, T. Andrabi, A. Banerjee, R. Banerji, S. Dynarski, R. Glennerster, S. Grantham-McGregor, K. Muralidharan, B. Piper, S. Ruto, J. Saavedra, S. Schmelkes, H. Yoshikawa]. The World Bank, FCDO, and UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • Gore, J., Fray, L., Miller, A., Harris, J., & Taggart, W. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on student learning in New South Wales primary schools: An empirical study. Australian Educational Researcher, 48, 605–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00436-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, & Purdie (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.

  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joia, L. A., & Lorenzo, M. (2021). Zoom in, Zoom Out: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Classroom. Sustainability, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., Zyromski, B., Mariani, M., Lee, S., & Carey, J. (2017). Establishing the factor structure of the 18-Item version of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(1–2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1326751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Bu ̈ttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koirala, A., Quinn, H., Winkler, N., & Macartney, K. (2022). COVID-19 in schools – the experience in NSW: 18 October 2021 to 17 December 2021. Retrieved 1st October, 2022, from https://www.ncirs.org.au/sites/default/files/2022-02/NCIRS_NSW_Schools_COVID_Summary_Term_4_2021_Report%20-%2018-02-2022_FINAL_0.pdf

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., & Bokhove, C. (2020). Metacognition and self-regulation: Evidence review. Education Endowment Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutch, D. M. (2020). The Covid-19 global pandemic: A natural experiment in the making. Lifestyle Genomics, 13(5), 135–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NESA (2021). Retrieved on February 22, 2021, from https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/resource-finder/sample-work/english/sample-work-english-k-10-st3-act3-informative-text-report

  • OECD (2020). Retrieved 22nd July, 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/learning-remotely-when-schools-close-how-well-are-students-and-schools-prepared-insights-from-pisa-3bfda1f7/

  • Osborne, J. W. (2010). Data cleaning basics: Best practices in dealing with extreme scores. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 10(1), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.

  • Patrinos, H., Vegas, E., & Carter-Rau, R. (2022). An Analysis of COVID-19 Student Learning Loss. Retrieved 16th October, 2022, from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/37400/IDU00f3f0ca808cde0497e0b88c01fa07f15bef0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Pekrun, R. (2020). Self-report is indispensable to assess students’ learning. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i3.637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L. R., Yee, N., & Määttä, E. (2017). Advances in understanding young children’s self-regulation of learning. Handbook of self-regulation of Learning and Performance, 457–472.

  • Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, M., & Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic.

  • Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual Framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in College Students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuge, N., Jenkins, R., Brossard, M., Soobrayan, B., Mizunoya, S., Ackers, J., & Taulo, W. G. (2021). Education response to COVID 19 pandemic, a special issue proposed by UNICEF: Editorial review. International Journal of Educational Development, 87,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds, G. E. Miller, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 45–68). John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serhan, D. (2020). Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: Students’ attitudes and perceptions of using zoom during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology Education & Science, 4, 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skar, G. B. U., Graham, S., & Huebner, A. (2022). Learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of emergency remote instruction on first grade students’ writing: A natural experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(7), 1553–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, L., & Rose, J. (2022). Researching in COVID times: Reflection and action. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrington, J., Bower, M., & Burns, E. C. (2023a). What self-regulation strategies do elementary students utilize while learning online? Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1735–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11244-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrington, J., Bower, M., & Burns, E. C. (2023b). Elementary students' self-regulation in computer-based learning environments: How do self-report measures, observations and teacher rating relate to task performance? British Journal of Educational Technology, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13338

  • Visentin, D. C., Cleary, M., & Hunt, G. E. (2020). The earnestness of being important: Reporting non-significant statistical results. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(4), 917–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 153–190). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2009). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Routledge.

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker & J. Dunlosky (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, the educational psychology series. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 1–36). Routledge.

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encourage self-regulated learning in the classroom. Retrieved 25th November, 2022, from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/merc_pubs/18

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jodie Torrington.

Ethics declarations

Jodie Torrington completed this work while holding the Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was granted by Macquarie University and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007, updated 2018) was adhered to.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 5

Table 5 Azevedo et al.’s (2004) coding framework with updated elementary school student examples (Torrington et al., 2023a)

Appendix 2

Table 6

Table 6 Rubric used for marking student research task (Torrington et al., 2023b)

Appendix 3

The Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Sperling et al., 2002).

Version B:

figure a

Appendix 4

Table 7

Table 7 Rubric used for rating the student self-reported written response (Torrington et al., 2023b)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torrington, J., Bower, M. & Burns, E.C. How remote learning impacted elementary students’ online self-regulation for learning: A COVID-19 natural experiment. Educ Inf Technol 29, 12989–13023 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12352-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12352-w

Keywords