Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jul 23, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 18, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 6, 2021
Direct and Indirect Associations of Media Use with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey in South Korea
ABSTRACT
Background:
The battle against the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has not concluded. Although vaccines are available, the high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy represents a significant challenge to public health and raising vaccine acceptance among the public is critical. While social media has become an increasingly popular source of COVID-19 information, the question of whether and how social media use can influence the public’s vaccine hesitancy warrants exploration.
Objective:
This study aimed to (1) examine the level of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, (2) identify influencing factors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and (3) investigate the direct and the indirect effect of social media use on vaccine hesitancy.
Methods:
A cross-sectional online survey took place over six days (January 20–25, 2021), a month ago before vaccination was initiated in South Korea. This study included 1016 subjects, and a logit model for regression analyzed associations between socio-demographic factors, health-related factors, psychological factors, and media use toward one’s COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, the indirect effects of social media use on vaccine hesitancy via psychological factors (i.e., perceived risk, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers) were examined.
Results:
Among the respondents (n=1,016), 37.5% (n= 381) reported that they were undecided, 1.8% (n= 110) would probably not get vaccinated. Out of the sociodemographic factors, female (OR, 2.056; 95% CI, 1.40-3.03; P < .001), age in 50s (OR, .40; 95% CI, .19-.86; P= .020), and over 60s (OR, .43; 95% CI, .20 – .92; P= .029) were significant individual predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. When it comes to psychological factors, perceived susceptibility (OR, .70; 95% CI, .53 – .94; P= .017) and perceived benefits (OR, .07; 95% CI, .04 – .10; P < .001) were related to vaccine acceptance, while perceived barriers (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.35 – 2.19; P < .001) were related to vaccine hesitancy. Social media use to obtain vaccine-related information was related to higher tendency of vaccine hesitancy directly (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.08-1.90; P= .014). Moreover, perceived benefits mediated the indirect effect of social media on vaccine hesitancy in a negative direction while perceived barriers mediated the effect in a positive direction.
Conclusions:
Findings revealed a considerable level of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in South Korea. Perceived barriers (i.e., concerns about side effects caused by vaccination) had a significant and robust influence on vaccine hesitancy. Obtaining vaccine-related information via social media was related to vaccine hesitancy both positively and negatively. Social media is a double-edged sword; that is, efforts should be made to disseminate reliable and timely information while monitoring misinformation or rumors for successive implementation of vaccine programs during pandemics.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.