Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2022
Date Accepted: May 24, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jul 11, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review

Skafle I, Nordahl-Hansen A, Quintana DS, Wynn R, Gabarron E

Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e37367

DOI: 10.2196/37367

PMID: 35816685

PMCID: 9359307

Misinformation about Covid-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review

  • Ingjerd Skafle; 
  • Anders Nordahl-Hansen; 
  • Daniel S. Quintana; 
  • Rolf Wynn; 
  • Elia Gabarron

ABSTRACT

Background:

The development of COVID-19 vaccines has been crucial in fighting the pandemic. Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines on social media is a major challenge, as this is thought to contribute to vaccine hesitancy.

Objective:

Here, we review the research on misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines spread on social media platforms.

Methods:

The review is registered with the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews (CRD42021277524). We performed a literature search on 9 September 2021 and searched PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register. We included publications in peer-reviewed journals that fulfilled all following criteria: Original empirical studies, studies that assessed social media and misinformation, studies that dealt with vaccine hesitancy, and studies about the COVID-19 vaccine. Publications were excluded if data were gathered before Phase III in the first COVID-19 vaccine development (from July 27 2020 to November 13, 2020). The narrative qualitative synthesis was undertaken with the guidance of the PRISMA 2020 Statement and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guideline. The risk of bias was assessed according to The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool. Ratings of the certainty of evidence were based on recommendations from the GRADE Working Group.

Results:

The search amounted to 757 records, with 45 articles selected for the review. There are many types of misinformation that are spread on social media platforms. We identified three main areas of misinformation: Medical misinformation, vaccine development, and conspiracies.

Conclusions:

To prevent these misconceptions from taking hold, health authorities should openly address and discuss these false claims with both cultural and religious awareness in mind. Our review showed that there is a need to examine the effect of social media misinformation on vaccine hesitancy with a more robust experimental design. Furthermore, our review also demonstrated that more studies are needed from the Global South and on other social media platforms than the major platforms such as Twitter.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Skafle I, Nordahl-Hansen A, Quintana DS, Wynn R, Gabarron E

Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(8):e37367

DOI: 10.2196/37367

PMID: 35816685

PMCID: 9359307

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.