Home Evaluation of menstrual irregularities after COVID-19 vaccination: Results of the MECOVAC survey
Article Open Access

Evaluation of menstrual irregularities after COVID-19 vaccination: Results of the MECOVAC survey

  • Antonio Simone Laganà ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Giovanni Veronesi ORCID logo , Fabio Ghezzi ORCID logo , Marco Mario Ferrario ORCID logo , Antonella Cromi ORCID logo , Mariano Bizzarri ORCID logo , Simone Garzon ORCID logo and Marco Cosentino ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: March 9, 2022

Abstract

We investigated menstrual irregularities after the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Women answered a customised online questionnaire (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT05083065) aimed to assess the vaccine type, the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the vaccine was administered, the occurrence of menstrual irregularities after the first and second doses, and how long this effect lasted. We excluded women with gynaecological and non-gynaecological diseases, undergoing hormonal and non-hormonal treatments, in perimenopause or menopause, as well as those who had irregular menstrual cycles in the last 12 months before vaccine administration. According to our data analysis, approximately 50–60% of reproductive-age women who received the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine reported menstrual cycle irregularities, regardless of the type of administered vaccine. The occurrence of menstrual irregularities seems to be slightly higher (60–70%) after the second dose. Menstrual irregularities after both the first and second doses of the vaccine were found to self-resolve in approximately half the cases within two months. Based on these results, we suggest to consider these elements during the counselling of women who receive the COVID-19 vaccine, letting them know about the potential occurrence of temporary and self-limiting menstrual cycle irregularities in the subsequent month(s).

1 Introduction

Italy was one of the first countries where the COVID-19 pandemic started [1], after the initial spread in Wuhan, China [2]. Lombardy and Veneto, as well as other northern areas of Italy, had the highest morbidity and mortality rates since they were suddenly hit by the new virus, whose biological and clinical effects were yet unknown [3]. Among the potential strategies to counteract the pandemic, since January 2021, Italy started a campaign to increase the vaccination rate of healthcare providers, fragile patients, and general population as much as possible [4]. Four different vaccines were used: Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), Spikevax (Moderna), and Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), which could be administered for the first and second doses, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) in a single administration. In addition, since 15 October 2021, the Italian government required to have a valid European Digital COVID Certificate (EDCC) for all productive activities and to work [5], and this further increased the vaccination rate among the general population, similar to other countries [6]. Notably, data from the EudraVigilance European database (23 June 2021) show in young adult (18–64 years old) and older (≥65 years old) recipients a higher number of severe adverse events caused by venous blood clots, haemorrhage, thromboembolic disease, and arterial events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, with the use of virus-based COVID-19 vaccines than other types of vaccines [7].

From our local perspective, we started to notice an increased number of outpatient visits for menstrual irregularities and abnormal uterine bleeding in women who received the COVID-19 vaccine. Interestingly, although the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) stated that the evaluation of yellow card surveillance reports does not support a link between changes in menstrual periods and COVID-19 vaccines, a potential link has been recently suggested and solicited further investigation [8]. In this scenario, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently awarded one-year supplemental grants, totalling $1.67 million, to five institutions for exploring potential links between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual changes [9], since some women have reported experiencing irregular or missing menstrual periods, bleeding that is heavier than usual, and other menstrual changes after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Interestingly, in a recent study on women of childbearing age, approximately 25% of patients infected with COVID-19 experienced menstrual disruption [10]. In addition, women infected with COVID-19 were found to have a decrease in menstruation duration compared with their own pre-pandemic data: in particular, Demir et al. found a positive correlation between the stress and anxiety associated with COVID-19 and menstrual cycle dysregulations [11].

Based on these elements, we decided to investigate the occurrence of menstrual irregularities and abnormal uterine bleeding after the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, correlate these cases to the type of vaccine administered, and evaluate how long this effect lasted.

2 Methods

2.1 Setting, data sources, and study population

We designed a customised pilot questionnaire (menstruation after COVID vaccine, MECOVAC) consisting of 26 multiple-choice questions. The first 13 items aimed to assess age, body mass index, concurrent gynaecological and non-gynaecological disorders, use hormonal and non-hormonal pharmacological treatments, number of previous pregnancies and abortions, reproductive or (peri)menopausal status, and type of COVID-19 vaccine used for the first and second doses (single in case of Janssen by Johnson & Johnson). The following three questions (items 14–16) assessed the frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycles before the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (single in the case of Janssen by Johnson & Johnson). The following five questions (items 17–21) assessed the phase of the menstrual cycle in which the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (single in the case of Janssen by Johnson & Johnson) was administered, the frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after the administration, and how long this effect lasted in case of menstrual cycle irregularities and/or abnormal uterine bleeding. The last five questions (items 22–26) assessed the phase of the menstrual cycle in which the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (not applicable in case of the single dose of Janssen by Johnson & Johnson) was administered, the frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after the administration, and how long this effect lasted in case of menstrual cycle irregularities and/or abnormal uterine bleeding.

In women of reproductive age who were not using hormonal therapies, any frequency shorter than 25 days or longer than 36 days, any length shorter than 3 days or longer than 7 days, and any quantity estimated less or more than previous cycles was defined as abnormal.

We considered days 1–3 of the cycle as menstruation, days 4–9 as the early-mid follicular phase, days 10–14 as the late follicular phase, days 14–21 as the early-mid luteal phase, and days 21–28 as the late luteal phase.

The questionnaire was designed to be self-administered, only one time per respondent, and without any restriction regarding the timing of the first or second dose of the vaccine. The survey was available only in the Italian language, for 30 days, (10 September 2021; 10 October 2021) and distributed by social media (LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter).

To limit confounders, in the current analysis, we excluded women with gynaecological and non-gynaecological diseases, undergoing hormonal and non-hormonal treatments, in perimenopause or menopause, as well as who had irregular menstrual cycle in the last 12 months before vaccine administration.

2.2 Study registration and ethical and methodological standards

The study was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (registration ID: NCT05083065) before starting the enrolment. The design, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting, and revisions conform to the Helsinki Declaration, the Committeeon Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (http://publicationethics.org/), and the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-surveys [12], available through the enhancing the quality and transparency of health research (EQUATOR) network (www.equator-network.org). The data collected through the survey were anonymised, taking into account the observational nature of the study, without personal data that could lead to formal identification, so a formal Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was not mandatory (Code of Federal Regulation, Title 45, part 46, subpart A, sec. 46.101, available through the Office for Human Research Protections, Rockville, USA, and validated by the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Washington, USA). Each patient enrolled in this study gave informed consent to allow data collection and analysis for research purposes before starting the survey. The study was not supported by any fund/grant, and no remuneration was offered to encourage patients to give consent to enter, continue, or complete the survey.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were mainly descriptive. We reported absolute and relative frequencies for the frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after vaccine administration. For selected bivariate associations (frequency by the vaccine type; and frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after vaccine administration by the menstrual phase), we reported the p-values from chi-square tests. The cutpoint for the level of significance was set as p < 0.05. For the statistical analyses, we used SAS software, 9.4 release.

  1. Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  2. Ethical approval: Formal IRB approval for this survey was not mandatory (Code of Federal Regulation, Title 45, part 46, subpart A, sec. 46.101, available through the Office for Human Research Protections, Rockville, USA, and validated by the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Washington, USA).

3 Results

From 10 September to 10 October 2021, 369 women answered the online questionnaire. We excluded 205 women due to one or more of the following criteria: women with gynaecological and non-gynaecological diseases, undergoing hormonal and non-hormonal treatments, in perimenopause or menopause, as well as who had irregular menstrual cycle in the last 12 months before the vaccine administration. Among the remaining 164 women, who were in reproductive age and declared regular menstrual cycle before the vaccine administration, mean age was 35.8 ± 7.2 years, mean weight was 62.0 ± 14.3 kg, and mean height was 164.5 ± 6.3 cm (mean BMI: 22.9 ± 5.0).

3.1 Menstrual cycle analysis after the first dose of vaccine

Among the whole population who received at least the first dose (single in the case of Janssen by Johnson & Johnson), 9 women had the first dose of vaccine using Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 133 using Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), 19 using Spikevax (Moderna), and 3 using Janssen (Johnson & Johnson).

The first dose of vaccine was administered during menstruation in 23 women, during the early-mid follicular phase in 26 women, during the late follicular phase in 36 women, during the early-mid luteal phase in 19 women, and during the late luteal phase in 19 women; 41 women declared they did not remember the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the first dose of the vaccine was administered.

The analysis of frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after the administration of the first dose of the vaccine is reported in Table 1, stratified for the type of vaccine and the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the vaccine was administered.

Table 1

Analysis of frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after the administration of the first dose of vaccine, stratified for the type of vaccine and the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the vaccine was administered

Type of vaccine Phase of the menstrual cycle during administration
Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNtech) Spikevax (Moderna) Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) Menstruation Early-mid follicular phase Late follicular phase Early-mid luteal phase Late luteal phase Unknown
Frequency
I did not notice any variation of the frequency 3 (33.3%) 58 (42.9%) 10 (52.6%) 2 (66.7%) 11 (43.5%) 9 (34.6%) 13 (36.1%) 4 (21.1%) 9 (47.4%) 27 (65.9%)
I did not have menstrual cycle 1 (11.1%) 6 (4.5%) 1 (5.3%) 0 1 (4.3%) 1 (3.8%) 0 3 (15.8%) 1 (5.3%) 2 (4.9%)
Menstruation arrived 1–5 days earlier than expected 3 (33.3%) 24 (18%) 4 (21.1%) 1 (33.3%) 5 (21.7%) 7 (26.9%) 7 (19.4%) 3 (15.8%) 4 (21.1%) 6 (14.6%)
Menstruation arrived 5–10 days earlier than expected 1 (11.1%) 9 (6.8%) 2 (10.5%) 0 1 (4.3%) 2 (7.7%) 3 (8.3%) 3 (15.8%) 1 (5.3%) 2 (4.9%)
Menstruation arrived more than 10 days earlier than expected 1 (11.1%) 11 (8.3%) 1 (5.3%) 0 2 (8.7%) 4 (15.4%) 4 (11.1%) 1 (5.3%) 1 (5.3%) 1 (2.4%)
Menstruation arrived 1–5 days later than expected 0 12 (9%) 1 (5.3%) 0 0 2 (7.7%) 4 (11.1%) 3 (15.8%) 3 (15.8%) 1 (2.4%)
Menstruation arrived 5–10 days later than expected 0 7 (5.3%) 0 0 1 (4.3%) 0 4 (11.1%) 2 (10.5%) 0 0
Menstruation arrived more than 10 days later than expected 0 6 (4.3%) 0 0 2 (8.7%) 1 (3.8%) 1 (2.8%) 0 0 2 (4.9%)
Totals 9 (100%) 133 (100%) 19 (100%) 3 (100%) 23 (100%) 26 (100%) 36 (100%) 19 (100%) 19 (100%) 41 (100%)
Length
I did not notice any variation of the length 4 (44.4%) 78 (58.6%) 9 (47.4%) 1 (33.3%) 13 (56.5%) 15 (57.7%) 21 (58.3%) 6 (31.6%) 11 (57.9%) 26 (63.4%)
I had spotting 2 (22.2%) 12 (9%) 0 0 2 (8.7%) 2 (7.7%) 2 (5.6%) 3 (15.8%) 1 (5.3%) 4 (9.8%)
Menstruation lasted more than 7 days 2 (22.2%) 21 (15.8%) 3 (15.8%) 2 (66.7%) 4 (17.4%) 5 (19.2%) 6 (16.7%) 7 (36.8%) 3 (15.8%) 3 (7.3%)
Menstruation lasted less than 3 days 1 (11.1%) 22 (16.5%) 7 (36.8%) 0 4 (17.4%) 4 (15.4%) 7 (19.4%) 3 (15.8%) 4 (21.1%) 8 (19.5%)
Totals 9 (100%) 133 (100%) 19 (100%) 3 (100%) 23 (100%) 26 (100%) 36 (100%) 19 (100%) 19 (100%) 41 (100%)
Quantity
I did not notice any variation of the quantity 3 (33.3%) 71 (52.6%) 9 (47.4%) 1 (33.3%) 12 (52.2%) 12 (46.2%) 20 (55.6%) 5 (26.3%) 10 (52.6%) 25 (58.5%)
Menstruation was heavier than usual 5 (55.6%) 33 (24.8%) 3 (15.8%) 2 (66.7%) 6 (26.1%) 11 (42.3%) 8 (22.2%) 11 (57.9%) 3 (15.8%) 4 (9.8%)
Menstruation was less heavy than usual 1 (11.1%) 29 (21.8%) 7 (36.8%) 0 5 (21.7%) 3 (11.5%) 8 (22.2%) 3 (15.8%) 6 (31.6%) 12 (29.3%)
Totals 9 (100%) 133 (100%) 19 (100%) 3 (100%) 23 (100%) 26 (100%) 36 (100%) 19 (100%) 19 (100%) 41 (100%)

Among the women who had menstrual cycle irregularities after the first dose (n = 94), these occurred only during the first month after the vaccination in 28 (29.8%) cases, only during the second month after the vaccination in 5 (5.3%) cases, lasted for both the first and second month in 19 (20.2%) cases, and finally was reported for more than two months in 42 (44.7%) cases.

3.2 Menstrual cycle analysis after the second dose of vaccine

Among the 135 women who received also the second vaccine dose, 8 women had the second dose of vaccine using Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 113 using Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), 14 using Spikevax (Moderna).

The second dose of vaccine was administered during menstruation in 24 women, during the early-mid follicular phase in 22 women, during the late follicular phase in 19 women, during the early-mid luteal phase in 14 women, and during the late luteal phase in 17 women; 39 women declared they did not remember the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the first dose of the vaccine was administered.

The analysis of frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after the administration of the second vaccine dose is reported in Table 2, stratified for the type of vaccine and the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the vaccine was administered.

Table 2

Analysis of frequency, length, and quantity of the menstrual cycle after the administration of the second dose of the vaccine, stratified for the type of vaccine and the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the vaccine was administered

Type of vaccine Phase of the menstrual cycle during administration
Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNtech) Spikevax (Moderna) Menstruation Early-mid follicular phase Late follicular phase Early-mid luteal phase Late luteal phase Unknown
Frequency
I did not notice any variation of the frequency 2 (25%) 54 (47.8%) 3 (21.4%) 9 (37.5%) 13 (59.1%) 6 (31.6%) 8 (57.1%) 4 (23.5%) 19 (48.7%)
I did not have menstrual cycle 0 6 (5.3%) 1 (7.1%) 1 (4.2%) 0 1 (5.3%) 1 (7.1%) 2 (11.8%) 2 (5.1%)
Menstruation arrived 1–5 days earlier than expected 3 (37.5%) 14 (12.4%) 5 (35.7%) 4 (16.7%) 1 (4.5%) 2 (10.5%) 3 (21.4%) 6 (35.3%) 6 (15.4%)
Menstruation arrived 5–10 days earlier than expected 1 (12.5%) 11 (9.7%) 2 (14.3%) 3 (12.5%) 2 (9.1%) 4 (21.1%) 0 3 (17.6%) 2 (5.1%)
Menstruation arrived more than 10 days earlier than expected 1 (12.5%) 8 (7.1%) 2 (14.3%) 2 (8.3%) 3 (13.6%) 4 (21.1%) 1 (7.1%) 0 1 (2.6%)
Menstruation arrived 1–5 days later than expected 0 8 (7.1%) 1 (7.1%) 3 (12.5%) 1 (4.5%) 0 0 0 5 (12.8%)
Menstruation arrived 5–10 days later than expected 1 (12.5%) 3 (2.7%) 0 1 (4.2%) 1 (4.5%) 1 (5.3%) 0 1 (5.9%) 0
Menstruation arrived more than 10 days later than expected 0 9 (8%) 0 1 (4.2%) 1 (4.5%) 1 (5.3%) 1 (7.1%) 1 (5.9%) 4 (10.3%)
Totals 8 (100%) 113 (100%) 14 (100%) 24 (100%) 22 (100%) 19 (100%) 14 (100%) 17 (100%) 39 (100%)
Length
I did not notice any variation of the length 4 (50%) 65 (57.5%) 8 (57.1%) 15 (62.5%) 13 (59.1%) 6 (31.6%) 7 (50%) 11 (64.7%) 25 (64.1%)
I had spotting 0 5 (4.4%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 (12.8%)
Menstruation lasted more than 7 days 4 (50%) 24 (21.2%) 4 (28.6%) 5 (20.8%) 6 (27.3%) 9 (47.4%) 5 (35.7%) 4 (23.5%) 3 (7.7%)
Menstruation lasted less than 3 days 0 19 (16.8%) 2 (14.3%) 4 (16.7%) 3 (13.6%) 4 (21.1%) 2 (14.3%) 2 (11.8%) 6 (15.4%)
Totals 8 (100%) 113 (100%) 14 (100%) 24 (100%) 22 (100%) 19 (100%) 14 (100%) 17 (100%) 39 (100%)
Quantity
I did not notice any variation of the quantity 3 (37.5%) 61 (53.1%) 6 (35.7%) 10 (41.7%) 15 (63.6%) 9 (42.1%) 7 (50%) 6 (35.3%) 23 (59%)
Menstruation was heavier than usual 5 (62.5%) 32 (28.3%) 4 (28.6%) 9 (37.5%) 4 (18.2%) 7 (36.8%) 6 (42.9%) 7 (41.2%) 8 (20.5%)
Menstruation was less heavy than usual 0 20 (17.7%) 4 (28.6%) 5 (20.8%) 3 (13.6%) 3 (15.8%) 1 (7.1%) 4 (23.5%) 8 (20.5%)
Totals 8 (100%) 113 (100%) 14 (100%) 24 (100%) 22 (100%) 19 (100%) 14 (100%) 17 (100%) 39 (100%)

Among the women who had menstrual cycle irregularities after the second dose (n = 84), these occurred only during the first month after the vaccination in 19 (22.6%) cases, only during the second month after the vaccination in 6 (7.1%) cases, lasted for both the first and second month in 21 (25%) cases, and finally was reported for more than two months in 38 (45.2%) cases.

4 Discussion

4.1 Main findings after the first dose of vaccine

After the first dose of vaccine, 66.7% of women who received Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 57.1% of women who received Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), 47.4% of women who received Spikevax (Moderna), and 33.3% of women who received Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) reported alterations in the frequency of the subsequent menstrual cycle. Most of these women had menstruation 1–5 days earlier than expected, and this alteration occurred mainly when the first dose of vaccine was administered during the first 14 days of the menstrual cycle. However, we did not find significant differences (p = 0.45) in the occurrence of this menstrual irregularity based on when the first vaccine dose was administered (follicular versus luteal phase). Moreover, we did not find significant differences (p = 0.60) between recombinant (Vaxzevria and Janssen) and mRNA vaccines (Comirnaty and Moderna).

Additionally, after the first dose, 55.6% of women who received Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 41.4% of women who received Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), 52.6% of women who received Spikevax (Moderna), and 66.7% of women who received Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) reported alteration in the length of the subsequent menstrual cycle. Among these women, the most common alteration was menstruation that lasted more than usual, which occurred mainly when the vaccine was administered during the early luteal phase, although we did not find significant differences (p = 0.90) based on when the first vaccine dose was administered (follicular versus luteal phase).

Finally, after the first dose, 66.7% of women who received Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 47.4% of women who received Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), 52.6% of women who received Spikevax (Moderna), and 66.7% of the women who received Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) declared alteration in the quantity of the subsequent menstrual flow. Among these women, the most common alteration was heavier menstruation than usual, which occurred mainly when the vaccine was administered during the first 14 days of the menstrual cycle. We did not find significant differences (p = 0.77) based on when the first vaccine dose was administered (follicular versus luteal phase). Overall, menstrual cycle irregularities after the first dose of the vaccine spontaneously resolved in approximately half the cases within two months.

4.2 Main findings after the second dose of vaccine

After the second dose of vaccine, 75% of women who received Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 52.2% of women who received Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 78.6% of women who received Spikevax (Moderna) reported alteration in the frequency of the subsequent menstrual cycle(s). Similar to the first dose, the most common frequency alteration was menstruation that arrived 1–5 days earlier than expected. We did not find significant differences (p = 0.51) between recombinant (Vaxzevria and Janssen) and mRNA vaccines (Comirnaty and Moderna) or based on when the second vaccine dose was administered (follicular versus luteal phase; p = 0.11).

In addition, 50% of women who received Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 42.5% of the women who received Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 42.9% of the women who received Spikevax (Moderna) declared alteration in the length of the subsequent menstrual cycle after the second dose. Consistently with the first dose, the most common occurrence was menstruation that lasted more than usual. We did not find significant differences (p = 0.67) based on when the second vaccine dose was administered (follicular versus luteal phase).

Finally, 62.5% of women who received Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), 46.9% of women who received Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 64.3% of women who received Spikevax (Moderna) declared alteration in the quantity in the subsequent menstrual flow after the second dose, and the most common occurrence was menstruation heavier than usual. We did not find significant differences (p = 0.69) based on when the second vaccine dose was administered (follicular versus luteal phase). Similar to the first dose, menstrual cycle irregularities after the second dose of vaccine spontaneously resolved in approximately half of the cases within two months.

4.3 Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few preliminary reports aimed to investigate menstrual cycle irregularities among women who received the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. To avoid potential biases, we excluded from the current analysis women with gynaecological and non-gynaecological diseases, undergoing hormonal and non-hormonal treatments, in perimenopause or menopause, as well as who had irregular menstrual cycle in the last 12 months before the vaccine administration. In addition, we investigated the alteration of frequency, length, and quantity of the subsequent menstrual cycles, stratifying data for the type of vaccine and the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the first and second doses were administered.

Nevertheless, several limitations should be taken into account for a proper and cautious data interpretation: first of all, we used a customised questionnaire, without a previous validation; second, this questionnaire was self-administered and diffused among the general population through social media, so we cannot rule out that women who had menstrual cycle irregularities after COVID-19 vaccination were more motivated to answer than women who did not experience this event; for the same reason, we could not exactly measure the quantity of the menstrual cycle, and we left this parameter as a subjective evaluation from the patient’s perspective (more or less heavy than usual), whereas we used exact ranges for the frequency and length of the menstrual cycle. Overall, the recall bias may be significant for this preliminary report. From the methodological point of view, we do not have a control group, so our report is aimed only to offer a description of what we observed, without any possibility to infer cause–effect. Finally, the number of women who answered the questionnaire is limited, impeding the observation of statistically significant associations between menstrual irregularities and the vaccine type or the menstrual phase at the time of administration.

4.4 Interpretation and comparison with other literature studies

Overall, our preliminary report highlights that approximately 50–60% of reproductive age women who received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine had menstrual cycle irregularities, regardless of the type of vaccine administered. The occurrence of menstrual irregularities seems to be slightly higher (60–70%) after the second dose, suggesting a potential additive effect. After both the first and second doses of vaccine, the most common alterations seem to be anticipated, longer, and heavier menstrual cycle than expected and usual.

Currently, more than 30,000 reports of irregularities in the menstrual cycle have been reported by 2 September 2021, across all COVID-19 vaccines [13]. A longitudinal study to explore the potential impacts of COVID-19 vaccination on menstruation is currently ongoing, supported by the NIH’s Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health [9]. Although the regulatory agencies did not find convincing evidence of a link between changes to menstrual periods and COVID-19 vaccines, concern regarding this specific issue has been raised by an editorial recently published in the British Journal of Medicine [8]. According to recent data comparing women who received vaccination and unvaccinated controls [14], COVID-19 vaccine was associated with a less than 1 day change in the cycle length for both vaccine-dose cycles compared with pre-vaccine cycles (first dose 0.71 day-increase, 98.75% confidence interval (CI) 0.47–0.94; second dose 0.91, 98.75% CI 0.63–1.19). Other reports, still in the pre-print phase, have provided further support to the hypothesis. Menstrual abnormalities have been recorded in 20–42% of vaccinated women, while 66% of post-menopausal women reported breakthrough bleeding [15,16]. Our results are in line with these last reports.

Menstrual changes following vaccination are indeed not so unusual, given that such modifications were observed after vaccination for other microbes, like the human papilloma virus [17], or human hormones, such as human chorionic gonadotropin [18]. Such disturbances could likely be ascribed to the inflammatory/immunological reaction ensuing from adjuvants comprised in the vaccines, at least in some cases [19]. However, we cannot discard that the COVID-19-related spike protein could exert a causative pathogenic role, as similar changes in menstrual cycles have been recorded during COVID-19 infection [20]. Moreover, diffusion of the spike protein in women tissues – either linked to COVID-19 infection or released after mRNA-based vaccination – can also interfere with the endocrine homeostasis of the menstrual cycle, given that the use of combined oral contraceptives was associated with lower odds of reporting any menstrual changes [15]. These findings provide further confirmation of the protective effect of oestrogens in mitigating the severity of COVID-19-related clinical outcomes, as previously reported [21].

Although speculative, we may hypothesise that what we observed could be due, at least in part, to phase-specific hormonal variation caused by potential pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulative changes. Indeed, several pieces of evidence suggest crosstalk between inflammatory homeostasis and menstrual cycle regulation [10], which may be slightly disturbed by temporary hormonal variation and secondary to the inflammatory reaction induced by the vaccine. Remarkably, reproductive toxicity studies performed in the mouse models with Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) [22], Spikevax (Moderna) [23], Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) [24], and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) [25] reveal no special hazard for humans regarding fertility. Although reported changes to the menstrual cycle after vaccination are temporary and self-limiting and no cases resulted in clinically significant consequences, the link between COVID-19 vaccination and irregularities in the menstrual cycle deserves to be investigated in further specific studies. We hope that the results of our study will help for a proper counselling and mitigate fear about potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccination, even considering the potential detrimental role of COVID-19 pandemic itself on the quality of life and mental health [26,27].

5 Conclusion

According to our preliminary report, more than half of reproductive-age women who received the first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccine had menstrual cycle irregularities at least in the following menstrual cycle, regardless of the vaccine type and the phase of the menstrual cycle during which the vaccine was administered. However, the occurrence of menstrual irregularities after both the first and second doses of the vaccine was found to self-resolve in approximately half the cases within two months, without clinically relevant consequences.

Although we solicit further studies to confirm or disregard this observational evidence on large dataset analysis, we suggest considering this element during the counselling of women who received the COVID-19 vaccine, letting them know about the potential occurrence of a temporary and self-limiting menstrual cycle irregularity in the subsequent month(s). In addition, we take the opportunity to highlight clearly that our preliminary report does not allow us to draw any firm conclusion about a potential cause–effect correlation between the COVID-19 vaccine and menstrual irregularities, or about any potential fertility impairment.

  1. Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Authors contributions: ASL and MC designed and planned the study. ASL, AC, and FG were responsible for data acquisition. GV and MMF had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. ASL was responsible for the initial draft of the manuscript. SG, MB, and MC edited the manuscript. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

  3. Conflict of interest: All authors declare no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Dr Antonio Simone Laganà and Dr Simone Garzon are Editors in Open Medicine, but this did not affect the peer review process.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Palmieri L, Palmer K, Lo Noce C, Meli P, Giuliano M, Floridia M, et al. Italian national institute of health COVID-19 mortality group (*). Differences in the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients who died in hospital during different phases of the pandemic: national data from Italy. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(1):193–9. 10.1007/s40520-020-01764-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Hui DS, Azhar E, Madani TA, Ntoumi F, Kock R, Dar O, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health – the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;91:264–6. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Perico L, Tomasoni S, Peracchi T, Perna A, Pezzotta A, Remuzzi G, et al. COVID-19 and lombardy: TESTing the impact of the first wave of the pandemic. EBioMedicine. 2020;61:103069. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Alanezi F, Aljahdali A, Alyousef SM, Alrashed H, Mushcab H, AlThani B, et al. A comparative study on the strategies adopted by the United Kingdom, India, China, Italy, and Saudi Arabia to contain the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Healthc Leadersh. 2020;12:117–31. 10.2147/JHL.S266491.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Roncati L, Roncati M. COVID-19 “Green Pass”: a lesson on the proportionality principle from galicia. Eur J Health Law. 2021. 10.1163/15718093-bja10055.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Kamin-Friedman S, Peled Raz M. Lessons from Israel’s COVID-19 green pass program. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021;10(1):61. 10.1186/s13584-021-00496-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Cari L, Alhosseini MN, Fiore P, Pierno S, Pacor S, Bergamo A, et al. Cardiovascular, neurological, and pulmonary events following vaccination with the BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines: An analysis of European data. J Autoimmun. 2021;125:102742. 10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102742.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Male V. Menstrual changes after covid-19 vaccination. BMJ. 2021;374:n2211. 10.1136/bmj.n2211.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Item of interest: NIH funds studies to assess potential effects of COVID-19 vaccination on menstruation. [Internet]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/newsroom/news/083021-COVID-19-vaccination-menstruation.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Li K, Chen G, Hou H, Liao Q, Chen J, Bai H, et al. Analysis of sex hormones and menstruation in COVID-19 women of child-bearing age. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(1):260–7. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Demir O, Sal H, Comba C. Triangle of COVID, anxiety and menstrual cycle. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(8):1257–61. 10.1080/01443615.2021.1907562.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34. 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34, Erratum in: 10.2196/jmir.2042.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Coronavirus vaccine – weekly summary of yellow card reporting. [Internet]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Edelman A, Boniface ER, Benhar E, Han L, Matteson KA, Favaro C, et al. Association between menstrual cycle length and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination: a U.S. Cohort. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004695.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lee KMN, Junkins EJ, Fatima UA, Cox ML, Clancy KBH. Characterizing menstrual bleeding changes occurring after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. [Preprint]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. 10.1101/2021.10.11.21264863.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Alvergne A, Kountourides G, Argentieri MA, Agyen L, Rogers N, Knight D, et al. COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle changes: A 2 United Kingdom (UK) retrospective case-control study. [Preprint]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. 10.1101/2021.11.23.21266709.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Suzuki S, Hosono A. No association between HPV vaccine and reported post-vaccination symptoms in Japanese young women: Results of the Nagoya study. Papillomavirus Res. 2018;5:96–103. 10.1016/j.pvr.2018.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kharat I, Nair NS, Dhall K, Sawhney H, Krishna U, Shahani SM, et al. Analysis of menstrual records of women immunized with anti-hCG vaccines inducing antibodies partially cross-reactive with hLH. Contraception. 1990;41(3):293–9. 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90070-c.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Colafrancesco S, Perricone C, Tomljenovic L, Shoenfeld Y. Human papilloma virus vaccine and primary ovarian failure: another facet of the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;70(4):309–16. 10.1111/aji.12151.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Costeira R, Lee KA, Murray B, Christiansen C, Castillo-Fernandez J, Ni Lochlainn M, et al. Estrogen and COVID-19 symptoms: associations in women from the COVID Symptom Study. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257051. 10.1371/journal.pone.0257051.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Critchley HOD, Maybin JA, Armstrong GM, Williams ARW. Physiology of the endometrium and regulation of menstruation. Physiol Rev. 2020;100(3):1149–79. 10.1152/physrev.00031.2019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] EMA/707383/2020 Corr.1*1 (19 February 2021) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Assessment report – Comirnaty – Common name: COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (nucleoside-modified). Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005735/0000. [Internet]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[23] EMA/15689/2021 Corr.1*1 (11 March 2021) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Assessment report – COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna – Common name: COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside-modified). Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005791/0000.[Internet]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[24] EMA/94907/2021 (29 January 2021) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Assessment report – COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca – Common name: COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S [recombinant]). Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005675/0000. [Internet]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/vaxzevria-previously-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[25] EMA/158424/2021 (11 March 2021) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Assessment report – COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen – Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005737/0000. [Internet]; 2021. [cited 2021 Dec 27]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/covid-19-vaccine-janssen-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Biviá-Roig G, La Rosa VL, Gómez-Tébar M, Serrano-Raya L, Amer-Cuenca JJ, Caruso S, et al. Analysis of the impact of the confinement resulting from COVID-19 on the lifestyle and psychological wellbeing of Spanish pregnant women: an internet-based cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5933. 10.3390/ijerph17165933.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Kolker S, Biringer A, Bytautas J, Blumenfeld H, Kukan S, Carroll JC. Pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploration of patients’ lived experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):851. 10.1186/s12884-021-04337-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2022-01-05
Revised: 2022-02-06
Accepted: 2022-02-18
Published Online: 2022-03-09

© 2022 Antonio Simone Laganà et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. AMBRA1 attenuates the proliferation of uveal melanoma cells
  3. A ceRNA network mediated by LINC00475 in papillary thyroid carcinoma
  4. Differences in complications between hepatitis B-related cirrhosis and alcohol-related cirrhosis
  5. Effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Long noncoding RNA NR2F1-AS1 stimulates the tumorigenic behavior of non-small cell lung cancer cells by sponging miR-363-3p to increase SOX4
  7. Promising novel biomarkers and candidate small-molecule drugs for lung adenocarcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatics analysis of high-throughput data
  8. Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
  9. The biomarkers of key miRNAs and gene targets associated with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma
  10. Gene signature to predict prognostic survival of hepatocellular carcinoma
  11. Effects of miRNA-199a-5p on cell proliferation and apoptosis of uterine leiomyoma by targeting MED12
  12. Does diabetes affect paraneoplastic thrombocytosis in colorectal cancer?
  13. Is there any effect on imprinted genes H19, PEG3, and SNRPN during AOA?
  14. Leptin and PCSK9 concentrations are associated with vascular endothelial cytokines in patients with stable coronary heart disease
  15. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 6 and male fertility problems
  16. Staple line reinforcement with nebulized cyanoacrylate glue in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A propensity score-matched study
  17. Retrospective analysis of crescent score in clinical prognosis of IgA nephropathy
  18. Expression of DNM3 is associated with good outcome in colorectal cancer
  19. Activation of SphK2 contributes to adipocyte-induced EOC cell proliferation
  20. CRRT influences PICCO measurements in febrile critically ill patients
  21. SLCO4A1-AS1 mediates pancreatic cancer development via miR-4673/KIF21B axis
  22. lncRNA ACTA2-AS1 inhibits malignant phenotypes of gastric cancer cells
  23. circ_AKT3 knockdown suppresses cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer
  24. Prognostic value of nicotinamide N-methyltransferase in human cancers: Evidence from a meta-analysis and database validation
  25. GPC2 deficiency inhibits cell growth and metastasis in colon adenocarcinoma
  26. A pan-cancer analysis of the oncogenic role of Holliday junction recognition protein in human tumors
  27. Radiation increases COL1A1, COL3A1, and COL1A2 expression in breast cancer
  28. Association between preventable risk factors and metabolic syndrome
  29. miR-29c-5p knockdown reduces inflammation and blood–brain barrier disruption by upregulating LRP6
  30. Cardiac contractility modulation ameliorates myocardial metabolic remodeling in a rabbit model of chronic heart failure through activation of AMPK and PPAR-α pathway
  31. Quercitrin protects human bronchial epithelial cells from oxidative damage
  32. Smurf2 suppresses the metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via ubiquitin degradation of Smad2
  33. circRNA_0001679/miR-338-3p/DUSP16 axis aggravates acute lung injury
  34. Sonoclot’s usefulness in prediction of cardiopulmonary arrest prognosis: A proof of concept study
  35. Four drug metabolism-related subgroups of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in prognosis, immune infiltration, and gene mutation
  36. Decreased expression of miR-195 mediated by hypermethylation promotes osteosarcoma
  37. LMO3 promotes proliferation and metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma cells by regulating LIMK1-mediated cofilin and the β-catenin pathway
  38. Cx43 upregulation in HUVECs under stretch via TGF-β1 and cytoskeletal network
  39. Evaluation of menstrual irregularities after COVID-19 vaccination: Results of the MECOVAC survey
  40. Histopathologic findings on removed stomach after sleeve gastrectomy. Do they influence the outcome?
  41. Analysis of the expression and prognostic value of MT1-MMP, β1-integrin and YAP1 in glioma
  42. Optimal diagnosis of the skin cancer using a hybrid deep neural network and grasshopper optimization algorithm
  43. miR-223-3p alleviates TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and extracellular matrix deposition by targeting SP3 in endometrial epithelial cells
  44. Clinical value of SIRT1 as a prognostic biomarker in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, a systematic meta-analysis
  45. circ_0020123 promotes cell proliferation and migration in lung adenocarcinoma via PDZD8
  46. miR-22-5p regulates the self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells by targeting EZH2
  47. hsa-miR-340-5p inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition in endometriosis by targeting MAP3K2 and inactivating MAPK/ERK signaling
  48. circ_0085296 inhibits the biological functions of trophoblast cells to promote the progression of preeclampsia via the miR-942-5p/THBS2 network
  49. TCD hemodynamics findings in the subacute phase of anterior circulation stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy
  50. Development of a risk-stratification scoring system for predicting risk of breast cancer based on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease, and uric acid
  51. Tollip promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via PI3K/AKT pathway
  52. circ_0062491 alleviates periodontitis via the miR-142-5p/IGF1 axis
  53. Human amniotic fluid as a source of stem cells
  54. lncRNA NONRATT013819.2 promotes transforming growth factor-β1-induced myofibroblastic transition of hepatic stellate cells by miR24-3p/lox
  55. NORAD modulates miR-30c-5p-LDHA to protect lung endothelial cells damage
  56. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis telemedicine management during COVID-19 outbreak
  57. Risk factors for adverse drug reactions associated with clopidogrel therapy
  58. Serum zinc associated with immunity and inflammatory markers in Covid-19
  59. The relationship between night shift work and breast cancer incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
  60. LncRNA expression in idiopathic achalasia: New insight and preliminary exploration into pathogenesis
  61. Notoginsenoside R1 alleviates spinal cord injury through the miR-301a/KLF7 axis to activate Wnt/β-catenin pathway
  62. Moscatilin suppresses the inflammation from macrophages and T cells
  63. Zoledronate promotes ECM degradation and apoptosis via Wnt/β-catenin
  64. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related genes in coronary artery disease
  65. The effect evaluation of traditional vaginal surgery and transvaginal mesh surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapse: 5 years follow-up
  66. Repeated partial splenic artery embolization for hypersplenism improves platelet count
  67. Low expression of miR-27b in serum exosomes of non-small cell lung cancer facilitates its progression by affecting EGFR
  68. Exosomal hsa_circ_0000519 modulates the NSCLC cell growth and metastasis via miR-1258/RHOV axis
  69. miR-455-5p enhances 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in colorectal cancer cells by targeting PIK3R1 and DEPDC1
  70. The effect of tranexamic acid on the reduction of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss and thromboembolic risk in patients with hip fracture
  71. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation in cholangiocarcinoma impairs tumor progression by sensitizing cells to ferroptosis
  72. Artemisinin protects against cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury via inhibiting the NF-κB pathway
  73. A 16-gene signature associated with homologous recombination deficiency for prognosis prediction in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
  74. Lidocaine ameliorates chronic constriction injury-induced neuropathic pain through regulating M1/M2 microglia polarization
  75. MicroRNA 322-5p reduced neuronal inflammation via the TLR4/TRAF6/NF-κB axis in a rat epilepsy model
  76. miR-1273h-5p suppresses CXCL12 expression and inhibits gastric cancer cell invasion and metastasis
  77. Clinical characteristics of pneumonia patients of long course of illness infected with SARS-CoV-2
  78. circRNF20 aggravates the malignancy of retinoblastoma depending on the regulation of miR-132-3p/PAX6 axis
  79. Linezolid for resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections in children under 12 years: A meta-analysis
  80. Rack1 regulates pro-inflammatory cytokines by NF-κB in diabetic nephropathy
  81. Comprehensive analysis of molecular mechanism and a novel prognostic signature based on small nuclear RNA biomarkers in gastric cancer patients
  82. Smog and risk of maternal and fetal birth outcomes: A retrospective study in Baoding, China
  83. Let-7i-3p inhibits the cell cycle, proliferation, invasion, and migration of colorectal cancer cells via downregulating CCND1
  84. β2-Adrenergic receptor expression in subchondral bone of patients with varus knee osteoarthritis
  85. Possible impact of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on suicide behavior among patients in Southeast Serbia
  86. In vitro antimicrobial activity of ozonated oil in liposome eyedrop against multidrug-resistant bacteria
  87. Potential biomarkers for inflammatory response in acute lung injury
  88. A low serum uric acid concentration predicts a poor prognosis in adult patients with candidemia
  89. Antitumor activity of recombinant oncolytic vaccinia virus with human IL2
  90. ALKBH5 inhibits TNF-α-induced apoptosis of HUVECs through Bcl-2 pathway
  91. Risk prediction of cardiovascular disease using machine learning classifiers
  92. Value of ultrasonography parameters in diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome
  93. Bioinformatics analysis reveals three key genes and four survival genes associated with youth-onset NSCLC
  94. Identification of autophagy-related biomarkers in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension based on bioinformatics analysis
  95. Protective effects of glaucocalyxin A on the airway of asthmatic mice
  96. Overexpression of miR-100-5p inhibits papillary thyroid cancer progression via targeting FZD8
  97. Bioinformatics-based analysis of SUMOylation-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma reveals a role of upregulated SAE1 in promoting cell proliferation
  98. Effectiveness and clinical benefits of new anti-diabetic drugs: A real life experience
  99. Identification of osteoporosis based on gene biomarkers using support vector machine
  100. Tanshinone IIA reverses oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer through microRNA-30b-5p/AVEN axis
  101. miR-212-5p inhibits nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression by targeting METTL3
  102. Association of ST-T changes with all-cause mortality among patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas
  103. LINC00665/miRNAs axis-mediated collagen type XI alpha 1 correlates with immune infiltration and malignant phenotypes in lung adenocarcinoma
  104. The perinatal factors that influence the excretion of fecal calprotectin in premature-born children
  105. Effect of femoral head necrosis cystic area on femoral head collapse and stress distribution in femoral head: A clinical and finite element study
  106. Does the use of 3D-printed cones give a chance to postpone the use of megaprostheses in patients with large bone defects in the knee joint?
  107. lncRNA HAGLR modulates myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury in mice through regulating miR-133a-3p/MAPK1 axis
  108. Protective effect of ghrelin on intestinal I/R injury in rats
  109. In vivo knee kinematics of an innovative prosthesis design
  110. Relationship between the height of fibular head and the incidence and severity of knee osteoarthritis
  111. lncRNA WT1-AS attenuates hypoxia/ischemia-induced neuronal injury during cerebral ischemic stroke via miR-186-5p/XIAP axis
  112. Correlation of cardiac troponin T and APACHE III score with all-cause in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute pulmonary embolism
  113. LncRNA LINC01857 reduces metastasis and angiogenesis in breast cancer cells via regulating miR-2052/CENPQ axis
  114. Endothelial cell-specific molecule 1 (ESM1) promoted by transcription factor SPI1 acts as an oncogene to modulate the malignant phenotype of endometrial cancer
  115. SELENBP1 inhibits progression of colorectal cancer by suppressing epithelial–mesenchymal transition
  116. Visfatin is negatively associated with coronary artery lesions in subjects with impaired fasting glucose
  117. Treatment and outcomes of mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction during the Covid-19 era: A comparison with the pre-Covid-19 period. A systematic review and meta-analysis
  118. Neonatal stroke surveillance study protocol in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland
  119. Oncogenic role of TWF2 in human tumors: A pan-cancer analysis
  120. Mean corpuscular hemoglobin predicts the length of hospital stay independent of severity classification in patients with acute pancreatitis
  121. Association of gallstone and polymorphisms of UGT1A1*27 and UGT1A1*28 in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver failure
  122. TGF-β1 upregulates Sar1a expression and induces procollagen-I secretion in hypertrophic scarring fibroblasts
  123. Antisense lncRNA PCNA-AS1 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression through the miR-2467-3p/PCNA axis
  124. NK-cell dysfunction of acute myeloid leukemia in relation to the renin–angiotensin system and neurotransmitter genes
  125. The effect of dilution with glucose and prolonged injection time on dexamethasone-induced perineal irritation – A randomized controlled trial
  126. miR-146-5p restrains calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells by suppressing TRAF6
  127. Role of lncRNA MIAT/miR-361-3p/CCAR2 in prostate cancer cells
  128. lncRNA NORAD promotes lung cancer progression by competitively binding to miR-28-3p with E2F2
  129. Noninvasive diagnosis of AIH/PBC overlap syndrome based on prediction models
  130. lncRNA FAM230B is highly expressed in colorectal cancer and suppresses the maturation of miR-1182 to increase cell proliferation
  131. circ-LIMK1 regulates cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma by targeting miR-512-5p/HMGA1 axis
  132. LncRNA SNHG3 promoted cell proliferation, migration, and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via regulating miR-151a-3p/PFN2 axis
  133. Risk perception and affective state on work exhaustion in obstetrics during the COVID-19 pandemic
  134. lncRNA-AC130710/miR-129-5p/mGluR1 axis promote migration and invasion by activating PKCα-MAPK signal pathway in melanoma
  135. SNRPB promotes cell cycle progression in thyroid carcinoma via inhibiting p53
  136. Xylooligosaccharides and aerobic training regulate metabolism and behavior in rats with streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes
  137. Serpin family A member 1 is an oncogene in glioma and its translation is enhanced by NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 through RNA-binding activity
  138. Silencing of CPSF7 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells by blocking the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway
  139. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block versus transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia in children with hip dislocation: A double-blind, randomized trial
  140. Relationship of plasma MBP and 8-oxo-dG with brain damage in preterm
  141. Identification of a novel necroptosis-associated miRNA signature for predicting the prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
  142. Delayed femoral vein ligation reduces operative time and blood loss during hip disarticulation in patients with extremity tumors
  143. The expression of ASAP3 and NOTCH3 and the clinicopathological characteristics of adult glioma patients
  144. Longitudinal analysis of factors related to Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese adults
  145. HOXA10 enhances cell proliferation and suppresses apoptosis in esophageal cancer via activating p38/ERK signaling pathway
  146. Meta-analysis of early-life antibiotic use and allergic rhinitis
  147. Marital status and its correlation with age, race, and gender in prognosis of tonsil squamous cell carcinomas
  148. HPV16 E6E7 up-regulates KIF2A expression by activating JNK/c-Jun signal, is beneficial to migration and invasion of cervical cancer cells
  149. Amino acid profiles in the tissue and serum of patients with liver cancer
  150. Pain in critically ill COVID-19 patients: An Italian retrospective study
  151. Immunohistochemical distribution of Bcl-2 and p53 apoptotic markers in acetamiprid-induced nephrotoxicity
  152. Estradiol pretreatment in GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI treatment
  153. Long non-coding RNAs LINC00689 inhibits the apoptosis of human nucleus pulposus cells via miR-3127-5p/ATG7 axis-mediated autophagy
  154. The relationship between oxygen therapy, drug therapy, and COVID-19 mortality
  155. Monitoring hypertensive disorders in pregnancy to prevent preeclampsia in pregnant women of advanced maternal age: Trial mimicking with retrospective data
  156. SETD1A promotes the proliferation and glycolysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway
  157. The role of Shunaoxin pills in the treatment of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and its main pharmacodynamic components
  158. TET3 governs malignant behaviors and unfavorable prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by activating the PI3K/AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin pathway
  159. Associations between morphokinetic parameters of temporary-arrest embryos and the clinical prognosis in FET cycles
  160. Long noncoding RNA WT1-AS regulates trophoblast proliferation, migration, and invasion via the microRNA-186-5p/CADM2 axis
  161. The incidence of bronchiectasis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  162. Integrated bioinformatics analysis shows integrin alpha 3 is a prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer
  163. Inhibition of miR-21 improves pulmonary vascular responses in bronchopulmonary dysplasia by targeting the DDAH1/ADMA/NO pathway
  164. Comparison of hospitalized patients with severe pneumonia caused by COVID-19 and influenza A (H7N9 and H1N1): A retrospective study from a designated hospital
  165. lncRNA ZFAS1 promotes intervertebral disc degeneration by upregulating AAK1
  166. Pathological characteristics of liver injury induced by N,N-dimethylformamide: From humans to animal models
  167. lncRNA ELFN1-AS1 enhances the progression of colon cancer by targeting miR-4270 to upregulate AURKB
  168. DARS-AS1 modulates cell proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells by regulating miR-330-3p/NAT10 axis
  169. Dezocine inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by targeting CRABP2 in ovarian cancer
  170. MGST1 alleviates the oxidative stress of trophoblast cells induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
  171. Bifidobacterium lactis Probio-M8 ameliorated the symptoms of type 2 diabetes mellitus mice by changing ileum FXR-CYP7A1
  172. circRNA DENND1B inhibits tumorigenicity of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via miR-122-5p/TIMP2 axis
  173. EphA3 targeted by miR-3666 contributes to melanoma malignancy via activating ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK pathways
  174. Pacemakers and methylprednisolone pulse therapy in immune-related myocarditis concomitant with complete heart block
  175. miRNA-130a-3p targets sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 to activate the microglial and astrocytes and to promote neural injury under the high glucose condition
  176. Review Articles
  177. Current management of cancer pain in Italy: Expert opinion paper
  178. Hearing loss and brain disorders: A review of multiple pathologies
  179. The rationale for using low-molecular weight heparin in the therapy of symptomatic COVID-19 patients
  180. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and delayed onset muscle soreness in light of the impaired blink and stretch reflexes – watch out for Piezo2
  181. Interleukin-35 in autoimmune dermatoses: Current concepts
  182. Recent discoveries in microbiota dysbiosis, cholangiocytic factors, and models for studying the pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis
  183. Advantages of ketamine in pediatric anesthesia
  184. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Role of dentist in early diagnosis
  185. Migraine management: Non-pharmacological points for patients and health care professionals
  186. Atherogenic index of plasma and coronary artery disease: A systematic review
  187. Physiological and modulatory role of thioredoxins in the cellular function
  188. Case Reports
  189. Intrauterine Bakri balloon tamponade plus cervical cerclage for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage in late pregnancy complicated with acute aortic dissection: Case series
  190. A case of successful pembrolizumab monotherapy in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: Use of multiple biomarkers in combination for clinical practice
  191. Unusual neurological manifestations of bilateral medial medullary infarction: A case report
  192. Atypical symptoms of malignant hyperthermia: A rare causative mutation in the RYR1 gene
  193. A case report of dermatomyositis with the missed diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer and concurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis
  194. A rare case of endometrial polyp complicated with uterine inversion: A case report and clinical management
  195. Spontaneous rupturing of splenic artery aneurysm: Another reason for fatal syncope and shock (Case report and literature review)
  196. Fungal infection mimicking COVID-19 infection – A case report
  197. Concurrent aspergillosis and cystic pulmonary metastases in a patient with tongue squamous cell carcinoma
  198. Paraganglioma-induced inverted takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy leading to cardiogenic shock successfully treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  199. Lineage switch from lymphoma to myeloid neoplasms: First case series from a single institution
  200. Trismus during tracheal extubation as a complication of general anaesthesia – A case report
  201. Simultaneous treatment of a pubovesical fistula and lymph node metastasis secondary to multimodal treatment for prostate cancer: Case report and review of the literature
  202. Two case reports of skin vasculitis following the COVID-19 immunization
  203. Ureteroiliac fistula after oncological surgery: Case report and review of the literature
  204. Synchronous triple primary malignant tumours in the bladder, prostate, and lung harbouring TP53 and MEK1 mutations accompanied with severe cardiovascular diseases: A case report
  205. Huge mucinous cystic neoplasms with adhesion to the left colon: A case report and literature review
  206. Commentary
  207. Commentary on “Clinicopathological features of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma”
  208. Rapid Communication
  209. COVID-19 fear, post-traumatic stress, growth, and the role of resilience
  210. Erratum
  211. Erratum to “Tollip promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via PI3K/AKT pathway”
  212. Erratum to “Effect of femoral head necrosis cystic area on femoral head collapse and stress distribution in femoral head: A clinical and finite element study”
  213. Erratum to “lncRNA NORAD promotes lung cancer progression by competitively binding to miR-28-3p with E2F2”
  214. Retraction
  215. Expression and role of ABIN1 in sepsis: In vitro and in vivo studies
  216. Retraction to “miR-519d downregulates LEP expression to inhibit preeclampsia development”
  217. Special Issue Computational Intelligence Methodologies Meets Recurrent Cancers - Part II
  218. Usefulness of close surveillance for rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Downloaded on 7.5.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2022-0452/html
Scroll to top button